GNU bug report logs - #6935
24.0.50; doc for `font-lock-maximum-decoration'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 04:07:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, pending

Found in version 24.0.50

Fixed in version 24.1

Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 6935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#6935: 24.0.50; doc for `font-lock-maximum-decoration'
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:33:00 +0200
> But you apparently disagree with yourself in that case, since you
> argue both for letting them move to a lower level and not letting them
> change level at all (no levels).

Not I do not argue for them to be able to lower the level.  That's just
the functionality currently provided, and which I dislike.

> Be specific.  Which different font-lock features for which mode?
> You're just hand-waving, saying that we could split fontification into
> a set of "features" rather than a set of levels.  Sounds fine at that
> level of abstraction (simply replacing numeric "levels" by boolean
> "features"), but the proof is in the pudding.

I see no need for being more specific: whenever a particular need
arises, we add a corresponding config.

> Sure, there are lots of such considerations.  I don't oppose
> a superior design that gives users _more_ control over what gets
> highlighted, where, how much, etc.

I'm glad we agree.

> But where's the beef?  Where's the specific proposal?  Don't just say
> we should drop the user control we do offer without offering something
> better.

Strawman.


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 301 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.