From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 23 16:48:29 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2024 21:48:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46107 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rddP9-0002dl-Jb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:48:29 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rddP4-0002ce-3c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:48:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rddO4-00044n-DE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:47:43 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rddO1-00009F-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:47:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to: references; bh=RUVOdQVF9jSRP2TTn1BbbbM+KxTk9OBbZJ8kXxPVFa4=; b=MQIGYPKMqzSwk8 yp2mX9lCqqKGi3tlN/S1hU2wu4ecnvRaLeqsPSIx5uYZ/UhM9KjHccQx9NbNi70LTrDO8Hz6ESlkn HTuesDUj8dcbdFgLQ8zaevbfZYn+8Grfn6e/YMQBNjTYctQWhmkLTDOS2xBrx+vISStF3Ar4vrM2M w6KUtBRrvNDjKJ35HLu2tASdDMo477vd+GRM8mK2pY9Ee9WJx32+xRomtbqCV2q6jVG00Zb9jt5gV lBKJVuPGY5wfygaV2caqD1yrDlocj7Og5qf9MHYB3WjS1se1rAYy+Z0ptUjWABPY0TnwYire8mKdb tcZSoZhMVM0VZTgGtpIg==; From: Arash Esbati To: "emacs-bugs" Subject: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix control char in docstring Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:46:58 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi all, this is a small change fixing an unwanted control char in docstring of `reftex-cite-format-builtin': --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el index a0bc5c11ece..791b10412c9 100644 --- a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el +++ b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el @@ -235,11 +235,10 @@ reftex-cite-format-builtin "ConTeXt bib module" ((?\C-m . "\\cite[%l]") (?s . "\\cite[][%l]") - (?n . "\\nocite[%l]"))) - ) + (?n . "\\nocite[%l]")))) "Builtin versions of the citation format. The following conventions are valid for all alist entries: -`?\C-m' should always point to a straight \\cite{%l} macro. +`?\\C-m' should always point to a straight \\cite{%l} macro. `?t' should point to a textual citation (citation as a noun). `?p' should point to a parenthetical citation.") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I can install this myself, release branch I presume? Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 24 02:09:58 2024 Received: (at 69341) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2024 07:09:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60666 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdmAY-0002aw-GR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 02:09:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42836) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdmAV-0002aX-Qe for 69341@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 02:09:56 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdm7w-0002Ig-Qb for 69341@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 02:07:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=WiBJmgMveUzRHoYKChV99/75dXIDGeUK9p0S/UWWTg4=; b=nRFL2mBpm5xB 1MdqnUnZbvzQL6R4dqwKncGNTlZoZp//pb61IZggScPBAIm5kr5cCi40uIFSF97CCvuVWBJ1FT74O QHVrJ0A4vAuRiLOSjnEzo0FAkvIG0Tl62QMYaeouTs1YGKjDY5MuYG3y2Y4hcOmhkFXBkFtWyCSiG KYKzI2FvtLJ3CN+try+ufzuV89TGAEz2qB8O84c1ffZMkxf+6SPX5IAxZs7frgtg8WlyTir/z/xnu KD9SV25OFJLEbtaM36PcLRx3O8jqQHXTr/Hz0k4rFpDKVYNEpuKyJDSPI8JKdZuig5G/14FAjsAMa iNH43+3KNRXRVQe6PfqVVA==; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:07:13 +0200 Message-Id: <86wmquz6fy.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Arash Esbati In-Reply-To: (message from Arash Esbati on Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:46:58 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#69341: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix control char in docstring References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69341 Cc: 69341@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Arash Esbati > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:46:58 +0100 > > Hi all, > > this is a small change fixing an unwanted control char in docstring of > `reftex-cite-format-builtin': > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el > index a0bc5c11ece..791b10412c9 100644 > --- a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el > +++ b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el > @@ -235,11 +235,10 @@ reftex-cite-format-builtin > "ConTeXt bib module" > ((?\C-m . "\\cite[%l]") > (?s . "\\cite[][%l]") > - (?n . "\\nocite[%l]"))) > - ) > + (?n . "\\nocite[%l]")))) > "Builtin versions of the citation format. > The following conventions are valid for all alist entries: > -`?\C-m' should always point to a straight \\cite{%l} macro. > +`?\\C-m' should always point to a straight \\cite{%l} macro. > `?t' should point to a textual citation (citation as a noun). > `?p' should point to a parenthetical citation.") > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > I can install this myself, release branch I presume? At this point, fixes should be installed on the release branch only if they are very important, or if they are in documentation parts. AFAIU, this one is neither, so master, please. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 24 04:18:09 2024 Received: (at 69341-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2024 09:18:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdoAZ-0006Oz-Je for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 04:18:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59200) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdoAT-0006NR-UF for 69341-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 04:18:03 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdnbb-0000si-Cz for 69341-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 03:41:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=yAJsqYxhzohwP+D5O5UiJIaqfkU4wyOtNrVwPNeYMro=; b=Mv/+TRiuIYTXpUYr60B5 aZtrqGnNwr6aIUIyMBWU17gua2TebYHLCGBdlSMZwa9qAWaiPOgpl1c/sxU2G59+27z2BqdMQsp8i Zv+qAFYvflokBAhpzZRQ4pR75N3ATMMJvO8fgyaLKuQs5yfZbrM4K4jufd40ML1Caz+HpvonWjhkC aYJ4FFsDIev3wcmEs0lWIZpe6GVWYTT+t95N0MRAK5ZISROJyfWNGn01MXh5Zf7y2WD05Q/dy4fvj u4ZntlAWMetaKcZR68O1tUQgtuMD9mmh3NOxqDvMDuk665mYJBNfngCdcF86IFndZCW7CG37BhWTo tVnZsxRx0Y2xQg==; From: Arash Esbati To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#69341: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix control char in docstring In-Reply-To: <86wmquz6fy.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:07:13 +0200") References: <86wmquz6fy.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:41:54 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69341-done Cc: 69341-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > At this point, fixes should be installed on the release branch only if > they are very important, or if they are in documentation parts. > AFAIU, this one is neither, so master, please. Thanks, pushed, and closing. Best, Arash From unknown Sat Jul 26 12:12:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator