From unknown Mon Jul 21 18:46:46 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#69335 <69335@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#69335 <69335@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [website] Guix foundation links broken Reply-To: bug#69335 <69335@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:46:46 +0000 retitle 69335 [website] Guix foundation links broken reassign 69335 guix submitter 69335 Antero Mejr severity 69335 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 23 12:19:21 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2024 17:19:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdZCe-0000s5-KY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:19:21 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdYys-0005te-19 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:05:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdYyT-0004DD-Qa for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:04:37 -0500 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::102]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdYyL-0005QS-0O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:04:37 -0500 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [10.196.197.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ThGZ662y3z9smk; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:03:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antr.me; s=MBO0001; t=1708707838; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=iCB/1kTIhQ2Ers7oOZCKcQwrSw+6Ba9fRNWks1fzyyQ=; b=ZMPr3rrjf5oKZzTlwiHmS25D3w5u3Xu8tWHwBYWU+YCOredTY3pgE3S3YPRXbAZhhGfpe4 1O2rPHD5t6SuIcijZDtm5af/QjxsL8d1RYsaODxPLO08KiG5zrdDPpA2GiJxefDQEQ7LSh wsTQuCHE+A8wXjqAhE4aBKZumWcfIHk2G2RgSOuQXIS70AHNAs3Ngfdqf03lpT5+tDw1iT OHI4MVqCU/gvMAbk++212Nx2wi4OOSAlACX9UK7gYqXnwX1dtihT/yLSajUHea06yvQlpE psQyUlPgHcmvFEWf1suNlkbWTHYLj9mMUT62UTYXc8K5oW7dDa3VSjagiCfAHQ== From: Antero Mejr To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: [website] Guix foundation links broken Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:03:55 +0000 Message-ID: <877civ3yf8.fsf@antr.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::102; envelope-from=mail@antr.me; helo=mout-p-102.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:19:15 -0500 Cc: julien@lepiller.eu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) In the latest FOSDEM post, there are references to the guix foundation website and signup form. The foundation site is not available, and does a broken HTTPS redirect to the Guix HPC site. The signup form returns error 404. Perhaps the foundation should get its own blog post when everything is ready, and the broken links in the FOSDEM post could be removed? https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2024/guix-days-2024-recap/ https://foundation.guix.info https://foundation.guix.info/statutes/membershipform.txt From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 26 16:36:18 2024 Received: (at 69335) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2024 21:36:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40713 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reie1-0000a3-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:36:18 -0500 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.152]:36428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reiAD-0007Wq-0t; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:05:30 -0500 Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TkCml3Spwz9snc; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:04:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antr.me; s=MBO0001; t=1708981495; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=OHYx1aK3/zUG6H9p7D9kdyz6D8GWEkmxmItbBXm/PkQ=; b=bGon/SCNS4126G9ch5yCxMVjYAJnupA1U6spZYxJPZPFKCZFljFzj5RJypoNiFbxxr78SN 6FDMuQr8sWBdSfhOEkmAJfep/aEip66dul89CzbHU2/ap1lc9yAhrUwwbekBuMQk7IjLMM PMvP852CjkHs1nwnjG9pQDuPwL7/bgMk4UfwZb2ChLAcgjMu1qFYihATea+OuRVDG+5qZE 9PveN7PEssId7Ir52b7YeBA3ETrFjft/i+sGx2cqi0B17+6JsK5ixrAxSry2yKfhHVsujS 4Nj44zOHlnqwvH/Mxw6xXFa+mumn9/KjGjRI3Nvs2FDu1q2bsoeT1fokZLLpqg== From: Antero Mejr To: 69335@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:04:46 +0000 Message-ID: <877cirq6mp.fsf@antr.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Looks to be fixed now, closing. Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.241.56.152 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69335 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:36:06 -0500 Cc: 69335-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Looks to be fixed now, closing. From unknown Mon Jul 21 18:46:46 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:24:13 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator