GNU bug report logs - #69302
[PATCH 0/2] New "Getting Started" section for Guix System

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:20:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Cc: 69302 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#69302] [PATCH 1/2] doc: Add “Getting Started with the System” section.
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:30:17 +0100
Hi!

"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> skribis:

> This rewrite makes Guix System more approachable.  Thank you for the tip
> with “guix style -f”!

:-)

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> * doc/guix.texi (Getting Started with the System): New node.
>> (After System Installation): Refer to it.  Remove note about ‘sudo guix
>> pull’.
>
> I was alarmed that you remove the note about sudo, but indeed you just
> moved it and not removed.
>
>> (Getting Started): Refer to it.  Remove note about ‘guix system roll-back’.
>
> As above.

Right, I’ll clarify that in the commit log.

> Could you add a reference @uref{https://git-scm.com/book/en/, Git} like
> we do in the “Invoking guix pull” section?

Sure, will do.

>> +The previous section showed the overall workflow you would follow when
>> +administrating a Guix System machine (@pxref{Getting Started with the
>
> “administering” seems more correct than “administrating”.  I’m not a
> native English speaker though.

Probably, I’m always hesitant.

>>  The operating system is configured by providing an
>>  @code{operating-system} declaration in a file that can then be passed to
>> -the @command{guix system} command (@pxref{Invoking guix system}).  A
>> -simple setup, with the default Linux-Libre
>> -kernel, initial RAM disk, and a couple of system services added to those
>> +the @command{guix system} command, as we've seen before (@pxref{Invoking
>> +guix system}).  […]
>
> Could you move the (@pxref{Invoking guix system}) before the “, as we've
> seen before”?  Otherwise it appears as if “before” refers to “Invoking
> guix system”.

I like to avoid parenthetical expressions in the middle of a sentence,
as it breaks the flow, but in this case you’re right that it makes the
text ambiguous.  I’ll change it.

Thanks!

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 79 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.