From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:01:01 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69286: guix-build-coordinator-agent-only should not propagate guix Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 69286 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 69286@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.17084359793439 (code B ref -1); Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:33:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2024 13:32:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44529 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcQF1-0000tP-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:32:59 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcQEx-0000tF-Tb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:32:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcQEb-0003Du-RA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:32:33 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcQEX-0001y1-3t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:32:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11570285; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:32:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99xSHIz808zk; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:32:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (sauterelle.math.u-bordeaux1.fr [147.210.16.128]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59CD5613; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:32:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:32:21 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a0c:e300::1; envelope-from=andreas@enge.fr; helo=hera.aquilenet.fr X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) Hello, I installed guix-build-coordinator-agent-only into my user profile to try it out, and wondered today why "guix build" would build the wrong version of a software; then why "guix describe" showed a wrong date; until I realised that the package propagates guix, and that the thus propagated guix takes precedence over the one obtained via "guix pull". This looks like a bug to me, since it pulls the rug under the users' feet by surreptitiously swapping their consciously installed guix by a different one. Andreas