GNU bug report logs -
#69220
[PATCH] smerge-mode: add a function to resolve all conflicts in a file
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 06:24 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 22:15 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > > No: `smerge-apply-all-conflicts` would *be* the prefix command.
> > > > Instead of a prefix `C-u 8` which causes the next command to be
> > > > executed 8 times, your use `M-x smerge-apply-all-conflicts` to
> > > > cause
> > > > the next command to be applied to every conflict in the buffer.
> > [...]
> > > I think I see, so you suggest a function that would apply
> > > resolution to
> > > the next N conflicts.
> >
> > No, that's not what I'm suggesting. If you re-read the above I say
> > "applied to every conflict in the buffer" (rather than some
> > specific
> > N),
> > and I don't say "resolve" or anything like "resolution".
> >
> > It's really doing the same as your patch, except that the command
> > to
> > apply at each iteration is not limited to one of
> > `smerge-keep-(upper/base/lower)` (and that it's specified by
> > hitting
> > the
> > command's key binding rather than by choosing a string in the
> > minibuffer).
>
> Sorry, I'm not following 😅 The closest thing I see is you want a
> prefix to each of smerge-keep-(upper/base/lower) commands to be
> added,
> so that pressing a `C-u 0 smerge-keep-upper` would call the command
> for
> each conflict in the buffer. But that seems both less discoverable
> and
> more code to implement. But maybe I understood you wrong.
Aaah, I think I get it. You want a command that would iterate through
conflicts and ask a user which solution side to apply?
This bug report was last modified 122 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.