GNU bug report logs - #69108
false-positive warning "variable ‘_’ not left unused" in if-let* and if-let

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel <at> yandex.ru>

Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:22:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#69108: closed (false-positive warning "variable
 ‘_’ not left unused" in if-let* and if-let)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:00:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:42:07 +0200
with message-id <86a5npxa5s.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#69108: false-positive warning "variable ‘_’ not left unused" in if-let* and if-let
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69108,
regarding false-positive warning "variable ‘_’ not left unused" in if-let* and if-let
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
69108: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69108
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel <at> yandex.ru>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: false-positive warning "variable ‘_’
 not left unused" in if-let* and if-let
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:21:01 +0300
I've been writing an answer for a question on emacs.stackexchange¹ and to avoid
nested `if` and `let` clauses I used a `if-let*`, and result of one of the checks I
assigned to a `_` variable, because the variable would be left unused, it's only the
check being non-nil that mattered.

But when byte-compiled that triggered a:

    test.el:6:9: Warning: variable ‘_’ not left unused

…which is untrue, because it is unused.

The problem is present in both `if-let` and `if-let*`

# Steps to reproduce

1. Create test.el with the following code:

    ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
    (if-let*
        ((_ nil))
        (print "then clause")
      (print "else clause"))

2. M-x byte-compile test.el

## Expected

It byte-compiles with no warnings

## Actual

It compiles with a warning:

    test.el:3:7: Warning: variable ‘_’ not left unused

# Additional information

Emacs version: commit d4d5830f8a0 built two weeks ago from master.

1: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/80351/delete-prettify-symbol


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: 69108-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hi-Angel <at> yandex.ru
Subject: Re: bug#69108: false-positive warning "variable ‘_’ not left unused" in if-let* and if-let
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:42:07 +0200
> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
> Cc: 69108 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  Hi-Angel <at> yandex.ru
> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 02:54:04 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > > [...] repeating a test.  Is this what you prefer?
> >
> > Yes, I think so.  And you could perhaps avoid repetition of
> > (cdr binding) by saving the result of (null (cdr binding)) in
> > a local variable.
> 
> I went with a separate `cond' branch added instead, I think this is even
> simpler.  Ok?

Yes, thanks.

> > > {My unsuccessful doc tweaks}
> >
> > [...] I'd prefer to separate it.
> 
> Done.  Feel free to tune it to your likes.  Or send me an "ok", then
> I'll just commit this version.

I installed them both, thanks.

Closing the bug.


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 148 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.