From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 13 11:23:22 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2024 16:23:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZvZ3-0003rF-TM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:23:22 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48774) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZvZ0-0003qr-Ms for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:23:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZvYb-00075Z-HN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:22:56 -0500 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([212.103.80.155]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZvYX-0003MM-NX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:22:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605D920C81F9 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:22:38 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=kolabnow.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t= 1707841355; x=1709655756; bh=mOwbJqFBi+svvOmeb8kJanxUjvUN87C5R11 lyChbDbc=; b=V0b6/jBuZ4wgR3wZh5kKju39mHg6GZ0KUJBotkcPkunUEE9e6M6 FB8nsOfvMcGHRVbYlqPLc9SZZ/qXMVvuvr/Q5h4kgoxEoeOC+r055fXOQgG0KiSq sZsYlmb61hE0YgVTnY5xKI+nl93sPjiajnbzDF4AAJNrlB9AZwLV6r/eiiOPaoqt peh4fN6yzZiw9Pe5sIxy4kYGcDas2LS1n+FFmsIulU1jClyvExuGeRI0zshkh/CN W8D+TKFEiFc2gNS+Ei/W3EpOyIyx8IsdXsKk0x2zVGU/RwumXVAGE4xNz8nya/B+ rYqo11kmYvoG73AvagkmJVz6L2wzsmOc2ewVvDmcA6lGOwbseCe9Tz0v8g7AO4Zs sGmK94Edx+usne84jCodsxsqJqXT2S2v6lUlO3Heo0pq80AMc1+R93zHO/ZpVDzh FehPRf1Z7jVr4I5kpuIiRSCYdOClwEOMAkf5bhcI2Bbz2BppDu+46Gd77kIiFsJr XkBIWfD8joLcx6bhqCKcp3Y7Qh1hldGQOCOqNHxe7PY43sg+UF1YOaQB9S4AZkmr HsluhqRMMppyNRUG17KuAX7uDch7nHabr1WzMAxi5z0UVQSrdQPlLp5r2rt5Aygx jl9V50VUR9rv+CtJFvCU9jq17l2LVcJOfIE+BribDJdfh+RGd5T7rA+I= X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tj42lJ3F4Xri for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:22:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx009.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.9]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4E420C81F1 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:22:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10]) by int-mx009.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14E72091165 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:22:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:22:31 -0900 From: Christopher Howard To: Bug Guix Subject: SBCL enomem on 686 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Autocrypt: addr=christopher@librehacker.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEZEqk5BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAE/Dh4NUrMO5mxlZwV1H0X6DKaISWC/G5ws7voqpK6Xa0MEN ocmlzdG9waGVyIEhvd2FyZCA8Y2hyaXN0b3BoZXJAbGlicmVoYWNrZXIuY29tPoiQBBMWCAA4Fi EEMeL/OZnSMyOqPiAnGsX8bo2P8gwFAmRKpOQCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AAC gkQGsX8bo2P8gxyYgEA/ioHjyd0Bm3+YyW/vOLJZkDg1xx//zN9803Oayahz/gBAKwtHu69sqFZ /upw6mmyeP7ZndriTijMBZwfzcqDQWIMuDgEZEqk5RIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQO2aMfukvGwfyK7 f6DUkayD6h+RO+n6LGg0c0StFhF1CAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEMeL/OZnSMyOqPiAnGsX8bo2P8g wFAmRKpOUCGwwACgkQGsX8bo2P8gxD6AEAncJh7NhGGBlNG43b5rMeeyrYVewJirj4hk2qk1iL3 KgA/301OIl9HuuM1hBLPOSTftjwKJUWDbzBFqbyGUFWaCUB Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.103.80.155; envelope-from=christopher@librehacker.com; helo=mx.kolabnow.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, I was trying to run SBCL on an older 32-bit laptop, using guix on foreign distro. When I launch SBCL, the REPL dies immediately with this error: ``` os_alloc_gc_space(1,0x9000000,3221225472) failed with ENOMEM fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 4657 tid 4657: Can't allocate 0xc0000000 bytes for space 1 ``` However, the program does work if I pass in a --dynamic-space-size argument when I launch sbcl. E.g. ``` sbcl --dynamic-space-size 2000 ``` So, it seems like some allocation value or define is not being set correctly in the build for 686. SBCL manual only says: ``` ‘--dynamic-space-size MEGABYTES’ Size of the dynamic space reserved on startup in megabytes. Default value is platform dependent. ``` My system information: ``` christopher@q4os-desktop ------------------------ OS: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) i686 Host: CF-30CTQAZBM 001 Kernel: 4.19.0-26-686-pae Uptime: 21 hours, 54 mins Packages: 2357 (dpkg), 4 (guix-user) Shell: bash 5.1.16 Resolution: 1024x768 Terminal: /dev/pts/1 CPU: Genuine Intel L2400 (2) @ 1.667GHz GPU: Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Memory: 219MiB / 3020MiB ``` ``` $ guix describe Generation 2 Feb 12 2024 12:22:05 (current) guix bb92a4d repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: bb92a4d7bc71197a51eea9075387c5313f299085 ``` -- 📛 Christopher Howard 🚀 gemini://gem.librehacker.com 🌐 http://gem.librehacker.com בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 13 13:29:28 2024 Received: (at 69106) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2024 18:29:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47040 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZxX6-0002Iy-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:29:28 -0500 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([212.103.80.154]:49242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZxX3-0002Id-EA for 69106@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:29:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803E020C81F1 for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:29:01 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=kolabnow.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:content-type :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t= 1707848940; x=1709663341; bh=WSgl8EbFOFGxl1dIK5iykbv76s6B6WA7pxQ naTetoSE=; b=kojQ5cL7fIqXQhxwCEppCgUHYtrCfjrvlXR87MX6kpBhhap9Bzj S1ag5/s/0GP9EJXZhhpkgFMVWLnP7+uOfq1EyHFi0GDA1KEJW0G8S6f19AX9pFHc iSQ1pOSEDjKf7Til021wgnX3xDzU86FxKGnObZSRfXGHk1GWqcafKWD/xVp0yPAl fPFr2gcxtroUkOKstH707ItLTJNqsTB44XJHqov0qclgoig/f+C4oYl0i2Gjk4Ow q95FRXpEzHBjPq1GDAz8U8srCPM9bRS4b9htpJKGZTJnoy4rFinBAa7beAnhqp70 f5CKx0YqWsBafI5xd2e7r43i8cOPo/u1Xkmrqt6aVTUsT3zY7Qbd+m13RmOIBoAX 2SdwWLCyDG4URUY574/CB8y9xeauLejegYP4kVDjMfA+ySXpoX+YLILgpRHcUhgJ 2EYHCAT2FB1fvDpP1AqItoD8wUl3TgC8/fzEwgg2+9TBgYvdtVHleHMec+v2I0ub TxBMBfHB43Ojmo/rZmCbjdapEIjh7AJoxvQc/pg3InYlyNnQmb5B6LWhpOq+Pu+r b/m2AjUluaJkJ1cVe4If8l33aSlt0WgC8ovIgvHZo3PMctkjxOMGLmTIsS5pqyc9 V+WiK8OLsH1kJF3ZYjIOvQwcZBJbDtyDwLadcuBqWioWlyLpdNvFGoTw= X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-BSAPI-m7De for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:29:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx011.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.11]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B04E820C81F0 for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:29:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10]) by int-mx011.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 154B530B1E1A for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:29:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:28:56 -0900 From: Christopher Howard To: 69106@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: bug#69106: SBCL enomem on 686 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Autocrypt: addr=christopher@librehacker.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEZEqk5BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAE/Dh4NUrMO5mxlZwV1H0X6DKaISWC/G5ws7voqpK6Xa0MEN ocmlzdG9waGVyIEhvd2FyZCA8Y2hyaXN0b3BoZXJAbGlicmVoYWNrZXIuY29tPoiQBBMWCAA4Fi EEMeL/OZnSMyOqPiAnGsX8bo2P8gwFAmRKpOQCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AAC gkQGsX8bo2P8gxyYgEA/ioHjyd0Bm3+YyW/vOLJZkDg1xx//zN9803Oayahz/gBAKwtHu69sqFZ /upw6mmyeP7ZndriTijMBZwfzcqDQWIMuDgEZEqk5RIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQO2aMfukvGwfyK7 f6DUkayD6h+RO+n6LGg0c0StFhF1CAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEMeL/OZnSMyOqPiAnGsX8bo2P8g wFAmRKpOUCGwwACgkQGsX8bo2P8gxD6AEAncJh7NhGGBlNG43b5rMeeyrYVewJirj4hk2qk1iL3 KgA/301OIl9HuuM1hBLPOSTftjwKJUWDbzBFqbyGUFWaCUB X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69106 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Just noticed, poking around in the debian sid package, that Debian had to explicitly set ``` export SBCL_ARCH=x86 ``` For their i386 build. Wonder if that might be relevant here. -- Christopher Howard From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 13 15:48:55 2024 Received: (at 69106) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2024 20:48:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZzi3-0006wF-Dv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:48:55 -0500 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([212.103.80.154]:45368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZzi1-0006vA-HV for 69106@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:48:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684A7304FB55 for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:48:29 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=kolabnow.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:content-type :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t= 1707857308; x=1709671709; bh=rnX0BR+bWvQCy8LB7kMBFcXSXwKRPyYBxJ4 qXMHnOD4=; b=grfinAn/HEskOCdKNDwY9CNJ823HOhd0JHquXXjM1e+/sA39hXb 9CeNdJesH1ZmSRc31Gpi8bOgGevAZlFptoahq41rTCmMviy89iS25qY+8xiOWl17 8H7OCqgUNsK2aroSx8pityQgENQbs/KNSFcu55FwJcLrLqxiZ1MAjfgWUOi1/43t +LP66H12I+Zi7chjP05Sp0fAs3riBym7C7/4/OwknRqipwrhz1H71Q2dI75omoeW vgfn/Sh0G6QteH2HEpY/q6ofqSEILn4Qdl9o04AxZY1A35psfZ494qqYtpoMzpPG whogPaD0iOxS79Z+sGVNer51ccSDD/vQ+k+V6bB/QSmu0dHtnALwphqjtkQag7jB ki5FXGjy/Gf663K6aEdY74mrFdTydGl5rcOQSHOAyk3tl7p02fVASMTZaoXbiqjD RcfsPD3rOKw0P5UbiGwcWFdlDZLD9fI1l5/FB4IWIT9TkeELS/eWEemSWjRxy5ZV zub1T3Ih2Z7RBD5T1nYlKvy0LGv6voyOFpudq5db85xmrxifEKkOS2hdiRsjvZTP MFWdG0TBl+bh4uFWgp7C94GkSFW+nUzZWAvauUsOx9PvTJ+i4F59NbN9NtBOTE5H 7RaHNWb3pBzLKWp4lBhi+kM/LbEJYus5VF4g2qVUMtoe9brH4K7ho/ds= X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id OwAVYPUe6R6k for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:48:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx011.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.11]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C296A304D518 for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:48:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10]) by int-mx011.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE6530AD949 for <69106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:48:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:48:24 -0900 From: Christopher Howard To: 69106@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#69106: SBCL enomem on 686 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Autocrypt: addr=christopher@librehacker.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEZEqk5BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAE/Dh4NUrMO5mxlZwV1H0X6DKaISWC/G5ws7voqpK6Xa0MEN ocmlzdG9waGVyIEhvd2FyZCA8Y2hyaXN0b3BoZXJAbGlicmVoYWNrZXIuY29tPoiQBBMWCAA4Fi EEMeL/OZnSMyOqPiAnGsX8bo2P8gwFAmRKpOQCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AAC gkQGsX8bo2P8gxyYgEA/ioHjyd0Bm3+YyW/vOLJZkDg1xx//zN9803Oayahz/gBAKwtHu69sqFZ /upw6mmyeP7ZndriTijMBZwfzcqDQWIMuDgEZEqk5RIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQO2aMfukvGwfyK7 f6DUkayD6h+RO+n6LGg0c0StFhF1CAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEMeL/OZnSMyOqPiAnGsX8bo2P8g wFAmRKpOUCGwwACgkQGsX8bo2P8gxD6AEAncJh7NhGGBlNG43b5rMeeyrYVewJirj4hk2qk1iL3 KgA/301OIl9HuuM1hBLPOSTftjwKJUWDbzBFqbyGUFWaCUB X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69106 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, the problem is with these lines: ``` ,@(if (target-ppc32?) ;; 3072 is too much for this architecture. `("--dynamic-space-size=2048") `("--dynamic-space-size=3072")) ``` Package definition simply assumes that all non-ppc32 architectures can handle the larger dynamic space, but apparently not x86. Through experiment, I see the largest dynamic space that works on my old laptop is 2810, but 2048 seems like a more sensible number. -- Christopher Howard From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 22 04:07:51 2024 Received: (at 69106-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2024 08:07:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2rH-0001Yl-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:07:51 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:43263) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sh2rD-0001YR-W5 for 69106-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 04:07:49 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2088F240101 for <69106-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:06:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1724314016; bh=fygiOo51UE6RVO4YFZH1YObFXe61cQx2fuPpBDCpBYI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=Ysr7DwzIvGsk+rwfbQ0jQ6xHTkE0orP3L3JIv9fAsHK0she7gXifYlB4/A+AjzcFQ LS0wfHNi3q0QvSUn5ZjBdQMatBKNA7QSrKuhpuFO+KjpFAqkDBQ1+HbWIqsiLDpfqo 7VHbcQRkrGdIiZM17usVDh9NgdoravpPYgGdA6YxoKnM6C7ifRu+N1vKi4woope9BT 3kVsaGrNj/cEIQtcuzx+1MaJGAT699a665GJ9TKqS7wIAZJ5fuMIIBqrv0DbPXdur4 1lxrfjucsrETte5ffO3ckPRb8wpnKUJcC1+YgthTIlFXtQRclFfjtPj/su3Muo+AOd ntPQuTMUJ4nKA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4WqG4v0dvBz9rxM; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:06:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Christopher Howard Subject: Re: bug#69106: SBCL enomem on 686 In-Reply-To: (Christopher Howard's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:48:24 -0900") References: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:06:54 +0000 Message-ID: <87ttfdasm9.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69106-done Cc: 69106-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Howard skribis: > Hi, the problem is with these lines: > > ``` > ,@(if (target-ppc32?) > ;; 3072 is too much for this architecture. > `("--dynamic-space-size=2048") > `("--dynamic-space-size=3072")) > ``` > > Package definition simply assumes that all non-ppc32 architectures can handle the larger dynamic space, but apparently not x86. Through experiment, I see the largest dynamic space that works on my old laptop is 2810, but 2048 seems like a more sensible number. Fixed in 803f9d3038d3c3048079c63d51b7b40bff09f17a. Closing. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZsbxng8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j97xQD/U+Ik7QcFtfs3gRRarZFIinE46VyW2iO9kcUn vYLYRTwA/0IV2gwDu8auzpw/6NaBW/7hRbOhof1jdZ7RAJ/5TuOC =whyd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:48:17 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator