GNU bug report logs - #69078
[PATCH] esh-mode: Allow eshell-kill-output to actually kill the output.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>

Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:26:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#69078: closed ([PATCH] esh-mode: Allow eshell-kill-output to
 actually kill the output.)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 02:30:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:27:34 -0800
with message-id <ca97bad7-c02f-7a4d-b53d-af1257fef73d <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#69078: [PATCH] esh-mode: Allow eshell-kill-output to actually kill the output.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69078,
regarding [PATCH] esh-mode: Allow eshell-kill-output to actually kill the output.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
69078: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69078
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] esh-mode: Allow eshell-kill-output to actually kill the
 output.
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:22:39 +0100
Before this commit, the function eshell-kill-output, despite the name,
did not allow to kill the output, it always just deleted it.  This
commit fixes that, allowing to do the kill with C-u.

This mimics how comint mode operates, so from this commit C-c C-o and
C-u C-c C-o will work the same way in eshell-mode and shell-mode.

* lisp/eshell/esh-mode.el (eshell-kill-output): New optional argument,
kill.
---
The function name is misleading (and in comint is is called
coming-delete-output), but changing it could break code, so I do not think it is
worth it.  Adding the argument should be enough.

I do not have a copyright assignment, however the change is trivial, and mostly
copied from comint-delete-output, so I do not think it is necessary.

 lisp/eshell/esh-mode.el | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/eshell/esh-mode.el b/lisp/eshell/esh-mode.el
index fd279f61673..882fc67b9a1 100644
--- a/lisp/eshell/esh-mode.el
+++ b/lisp/eshell/esh-mode.el
@@ -832,13 +832,18 @@ This function should be in the list `eshell-output-filter-functions'."
       eshell-last-output-start
     eshell-last-output-end))

-(defun eshell-kill-output ()
-  "Kill all output from interpreter since last input.
-Does not delete the prompt."
-  (interactive)
+(defun eshell-kill-output (&optional kill)
+  "Delete all output from interpreter since last input.
+If KILL (interactively, the prefix), save the killed text in the
+kill ring.
+
+This command does not delete the prompt."
+  (interactive "P")
   (save-excursion
     (goto-char (eshell-beginning-of-output))
     (insert "*** output flushed ***\n")
+    (when kill
+      (copy-region-as-kill (point) (eshell-end-of-output)))
     (delete-region (point) (eshell-end-of-output))))

 (defun eshell-show-output (&optional arg)
--
2.41.0


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, 69078-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#69078: [PATCH] esh-mode: Allow eshell-kill-output to actually
 kill the output.
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:27:34 -0800
On 2/12/2024 8:22 AM, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Before this commit, the function eshell-kill-output, despite the name,
> did not allow to kill the output, it always just deleted it.  This
> commit fixes that, allowing to do the kill with C-u.

Thanks for noticing this. This makes sense to me, so I've merged it to 
the master branch as 572d58b5e8d.

> The function name is misleading (and in comint is is called
> coming-delete-output), but changing it could break code, so I do not think it is
> worth it.  Adding the argument should be enough.

I also fixed this, but added an obsolete alias for the old name. That 
way, it won't break anything, and we can be a little more consistent 
with comint.

Closing this bug now.


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 153 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.