From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170758762125431 (code B ref -1); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:54:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 17:53:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58007 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrXo-0006c0-PX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:53:41 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:42314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrXn-0006bR-G1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:53:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrNV-0007e8-CI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:43:02 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrNU-0006wJ-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:43:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D3F7FA0B2 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1707586978; bh=M2EA0qbADBmF7n+EjTPNHQFZ9SnzncGLs3AA//fiMbg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=pA1+wSEc/hctpyD0xWtxqaDbxzshC6TGO+H8T636+cQtZ2tBKp7li7SzTm+RWxxoj 1e+1+6/pN0sqrgnjiDs0rjLa5LT5Wn10KlDcDyFd84o3ZP7ZoZL8a5x2aXVo+E/rmM v2YEbMYXoPAwD5R+HLTn+jLeiDofZOWUCrEBbC7o= From: Eric Abrahamsen Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:42:57 -0800 Message-ID: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=52.70.2.18; envelope-from=eric@ericabrahamsen.net; helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) I've started using `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' regularly, and find it enormously useful -- it's particularly nice that it handles both inline patches and attachments. I don't love the automatic compilation step, though. I pretty much never want to go straight to compilation; it is very long; and the windows are a mess until it finishes. Even the magit/vc step afterwards is often not what I want, as I have Magit already open on Emacs somewhere else. How about some sort of custom option to control this? Either specifically compile-after-apply, or maybe a list of post-apply-actions, something like that? Thanks, Eric From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:01:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170759163515118 (code B ref 69017); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:01:03 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 19:00:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33640 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYsaZ-0003vl-AJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:00:35 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:44737) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYsaW-0003vH-DD for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:00:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1707591610; x=1708196410; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=8tCTF0oKNbO/2+U6zayrBSfs7I8lzkwC6fvIhgEMDkY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=JTu5xoecB/XTGsOhg93THqC9VIpY6+jSo2zy7yot5iAaKmzmidI6SwcFRdVvf0/X eKceDI+csqVlC0aw34r1C/9UkgMfr2l+aqvZ71SqRyjqzkT/DI/6lOU86kqzCQa5n AxKi/KCRbmwWZabXY/BYbiz+gerW7l61S1D77WWACej2Idcn5kT5poZCI/VgdrUP5 n0z7sJn6iM7+2DXb1Jk0g+37+s7MgQXDkzsT29eh7+qUVnS75fy2yGIzMip7fWDtx yIn7c1tWCyf1HCjwgmrljRFAzqYNrzIUpOVcYda3Q0u21RI5+XmR9IOabujz7jx7V EFzPBxt0pR9aP5LJow== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.16]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtfJd-1qi9Yl47Bf-00v9p0; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:54:57 +0100 From: Michael Albinus In-Reply-To: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:42:57 -0800") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:54:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:K6FSlw+FCRBtjBunS3le2aVp/J5VAI6JFMurJdniqmlFByh9WVK qAu4c1fnDogvHzEceMv+MVJ37rrCBZVamkd7Yt6+2xbNwkNtF4br+KxvsDUBCGB+rN6+0nc gCbuYoJ3SM12Sb3NwQlpz6UXxyHHTDtFqadNpKSGUAzSVvlOQYZ+W5dYxXTU1aw2c2274/z Df9Th+5DiQ5c513+hkwHQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:XK9l3y3GuKM=;XfdaXM7vB/4xdqRVsK//R6tAmoq iAZ4HK5CT8m7cDhtWwZ3QQfsg+b5KSekc+9AA9b4VldBjlq8v8sQujQxR+EZ+Z4NJlqS/88Cu FKlxi2GNqUdvE7DHN4HH07GrJEGhaB8j2R32EfjuvSmXSF+HGS3LwyH8uKC+m4TVSJpKDkU5L E2BBepoV94nkg40cUtMOso8sVTDqEY71OVv2G9HOx06bIq7cBVf3DCITp4kzRj67lKegaSSI+ gCIKxdoLFpo7A8Rn7L6ehRm3oF/LnAUh13EIjT0T+K4iB6NzT2gcup6jzkFBNGsWjS7E+C43u GDFJfKYDzsLkBKQ6ca8C4w0EROzwyBPsidAfd2+juTwMVbwRIW0diDQfWaN3rbFRY9RLvJ8Te zhM100F7AiGbj9OpzfVE1UAgylxTHt1c5iRHyrT10R83UvQ2csL9SpvO9OoxUupKeVGVnOfZX BK5pa9i1cS+5EOmmuVIuyPwrXQMZu5SIB337GhYLcSP4D1nA3HFymUllhRzrX1S+Ov8w1dll/ GqacoZ+DWOu9DJGxwc6j3ySSkbFbQno0lPPRBzKALP+TbqnpIPNhe+/wZVC4mjcNYidqyETXg PqlNuCP+G5f21ch8eBEcXIZKt98B876/ilX9PLM6x5KJqxgKu6iK8lYy9IQRwmyOR1AF/OBtO sAXQ+1liZzEWUZgEgYAXEUzAzZuJOXa523hXHTrX6B9CkwdLB0xhp9txECrQ8Typ5hE7CsbQF CfSTGGRo+CP8rUa3gBK3XhCGUjKIbGY9lUd3grH5qM6DScYeV+sa2JMG+PvzBfUzu3MuEvovH daYExicRBrJQvTtfIujw8+cN2b9JR7aLMzToxHCe8GsfxnMSNbW0AA0EXVno40fcIz X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, > I've started using `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' regularly, and find it > enormously useful -- it's particularly nice that it handles both inline > patches and attachments. > > I don't love the automati [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.15.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, > I've started using `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' regularly, and find it > enormously useful -- it's particularly nice that it handles both inline > patches and attachments. > > I don't love the automati [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.15.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, > I've started using `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' regularly, and find it > enormously useful -- it's particularly nice that it handles both inline > patches and attachments. > > I don't love the automatic compilation step, though. I pretty much never > want to go straight to compilation; it is very long; and the windows are > a mess until it finishes. Even the magit/vc step afterwards is often not > what I want, as I have Magit already open on Emacs somewhere else. > > How about some sort of custom option to control this? Either > specifically compile-after-apply, or maybe a list of post-apply-actions, > something like that? I don't use `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' by myself, so I have no opinion about. It was written by Lars for his own workflow. No objections from my side, if you make some optional changes. And please document them in debbugs-ug.texi. > Thanks, > Eric Best regards, Michael. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170759303519133 (code B ref 69017); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:24:01 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 19:23:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYsx8-0004yW-Vj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:23:55 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:60738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYsx7-0004y4-7L for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:23:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64AC9FA0B2; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:23:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1707593011; bh=nRPM0XevELi0ieHW+CMQ1M4MmNlsYKD88bUgoRY5Sog=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=YtnWCtSBVkDQlpMe8OvujQe9QbwH9Sax6ALvYsKBJYeiVaAXLtWqjOvCRoYOjiyYp vIFfnfVWZD+rao6kcNvk4d+uDd8xF8sevXNMuWIplTu2hhEcF7EAnF4t9zjWfbYsfj CKee/evskDymjAme8sx2AcP7hCKR0DNjYMkbIobM= From: Eric Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:54:55 +0100") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:23:30 -0800 Message-ID: <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On 02/10/24 19:54 PM, Michael Albinus wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > Hi Eric, > >> I've started using `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' regularly, and find it >> enormously useful -- it's particularly nice that it handles both inline >> patches and attachments. >> >> I don't love the automatic compilation step, though. I pretty much never >> want to go straight to compilation; it is very long; and the windows are >> a mess until it finishes. Even the magit/vc step afterwards is often not >> what I want, as I have Magit already open on Emacs somewhere else. >> >> How about some sort of custom option to control this? Either >> specifically compile-after-apply, or maybe a list of post-apply-actions, >> something like that? > > I don't use `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' by myself, so I have no opinion > about. It was written by Lars for his own workflow. Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying patches from email->repository? > No objections from my side, if you make some optional changes. And > please document them in debbugs-ug.texi. Okay! Thanks. I have a quick question: the :version tags on the defcustoms in debbug-gnu.el all seem to refer to Emacs versions, shouldn't they refer to debbugs package versions? Or is this also a Lars thing? Thanks, Eric From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170759329120047 (code B ref 69017); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 19:28:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYt1H-0005DH-1C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:28:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYt1F-0005Cp-8e for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:28:10 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYt0u-0007jZ-5y; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:27:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=innOIWcir2m8xFUOChCFBNv77F+NwL+PgQNDXuUoH80=; b=fOGDlDzSJ1hZ SuZLA1zGnsDZhQh5XO9NvqKEPyvZHAr2jFc3PJBBcKOGY/129aRQ+V+hHh0i8WXagVdm4/rDXAjrr TsuAYRE4VnPWSswtB0PxYb/rGPiXDHLbKaQM5v2mRAia6klAXks1pr2CdTAoOrbGEgmynYHzTbxRA Mp20Dr4/mABPxtYlPtDzaGr4SP9hOx5yqQ0jTS00jP2ABrjMTVldsdAPl/GOmxRBK1AJecJ2HeRDz yDP3AgcodImG/2s0odSRbrG+E2YeSd1biyoaM8kM8uyfRAZvdOV6mn8wtF7vq5oPwibeSSVucE1CY vJXCq6GiY2ZEk/0QTNwbsw==; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:27:46 +0200 Message-Id: <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (message from Eric Abrahamsen on Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:23:30 -0800) References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Eric Abrahamsen > Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:23:30 -0800 > > Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying > patches from email->repository? I use M-|, FWIW. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170759516225781 (code B ref 69017); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 19:59:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtVS-0006hl-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:59:22 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:49922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtVP-0006hO-Sx for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:59:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4E58FA0B2; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:58:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1707595138; bh=X+E5o4n7P4Sj9jiXzh/PhGvwgRlUkV0Mo3ucDixNgHE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=eB05iIX9UInr7zVicW8nwGN9a6lNbd45bbRD2comg9vok2RxR3OqqQW5W4sajX8uj NOhZUYI9S0jgv8dV8ilu8/2GRkKDMZfvreZCg2V+1sImtntFny2YoL6Ou/Y88zAKQX cVf5lQp0TK1xNP4W9GP6LkenyJRhHzFEHe45NVjQ= From: Eric Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:27:46 +0200") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:58:56 -0800 Message-ID: <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Eric Abrahamsen >> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:23:30 -0800 >> >> Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying >> patches from email->repository? > > I use M-|, FWIW. That's what I was trying to avoid! You're the one who has to handle attachments vs inline, type out the directory location, decide between "git am" and "git apply", etc... If you're doing it 50 times a day, maybe the muscle memory (or command history) means it's not a big deal. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.17075967938768 (code B ref 69017); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:27:02 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 20:26:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38990 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtvk-0002HM-Ji for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:26:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtvj-0002H3-6a for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:26:32 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtvK-0000Ip-6X; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:26:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Gs02VUhTExDtb+hDZQumYnCcBNlz9i0NykMup1aMQsU=; b=ilOdPVyNngRB c3q3A+MyVqGwmpKD1fkDZhFJPRDjWNBTM5rPSwVsTUtfR5Vt9mLHUIYN7Ot8yR+azzf0krNYbT6nK 5GikMijGoibxj1nEQtRW7W/1F6PmitZlKl/ArUGID/sDmoeXI3fDlzJUwyhTkOfWiefE/k47YQ5DH 2oq19RqhR4UVlYwuY+fYDZUs4Gem/8YW8Mt4DZz4s+pzNiALtbuPfDmTdlmehwxSxOUFXUKegaMlk MyShDV5w4zbZY7pzTf3XBSM3s3gfVae1y1FQI/Sf7qahDSBrIxCsaXXyiE54knA/JiCI4Xlj/1WEe fTTexuiDDledmsSz1Z/o2g==; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 22:26:03 +0200 Message-Id: <867cjct6as.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (message from Eric Abrahamsen on Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:58:56 -0800) References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Eric Abrahamsen > Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 69017@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:58:56 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org > >> From: Eric Abrahamsen > >> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:23:30 -0800 > >> > >> Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying > >> patches from email->repository? > > > > I use M-|, FWIW. > > That's what I was trying to avoid! You're the one who has to handle > attachments vs inline, type out the directory location, decide between > "git am" and "git apply", etc... > > If you're doing it 50 times a day, maybe the muscle memory (or command > history) means it's not a big deal. Emacs remembers the command history, so all I have to do is press a few times, after I type M-|, then type RET. And some figuring out is still up to you, because patches could be for the release branch or for the master (and maybe for a few more branches), so you'd need some "cd foo" before "git am". I have a command for master and for the release branch, and I need to decide which one to use in each case. That cannot be automated. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170759838913601 (code B ref 69017); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 20:53:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYuLU-0003XH-O7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:53:09 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:59240) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYuLS-0003Wb-8P for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:53:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A2C7FA0B2; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:52:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1707598363; bh=UYZKwQycsxxzqH7TfBejX3h1wVrLITIwwLV17tcWyx0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=LqhM5HAcAL3e1k6UhtGNWCqBmGxKLpx/sFhS7jGgMBvH2P/2C50u7Sh10mK2KswtF 3cg/v7QN6aPnqyvMpxwBL7sHiwxeLQNcmsY6cAWR6Asajf4X/KbGqChMZOBYXomVDw ZOfrkiQltE6rh2ZJJLsw2YsfVK8h2ZMZuU1qU8uY= From: Eric Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: <867cjct6as.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2024 22:26:03 +0200") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <867cjct6as.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:52:42 -0800 Message-ID: <878r3sxcrp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Eric Abrahamsen >> Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 69017@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:58:56 -0800 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> From: Eric Abrahamsen >> >> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:23:30 -0800 >> >> >> >> Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying >> >> patches from email->repository? >> > >> > I use M-|, FWIW. >> >> That's what I was trying to avoid! You're the one who has to handle >> attachments vs inline, type out the directory location, decide between >> "git am" and "git apply", etc... >> >> If you're doing it 50 times a day, maybe the muscle memory (or command >> history) means it's not a big deal. > > Emacs remembers the command history, so all I have to do is press > a few times, after I type M-|, then type RET. > > And some figuring out is still up to you, because patches could be for > the release branch or for the master (and maybe for a few more > branches), so you'd need some "cd foo" before "git am". I have a > command for master and for the release branch, and I need to decide > which one to use in each case. That cannot be automated. Yup, that makes plenty of sense. Your situation is more complicated than mine, no surprise there! I've attached the minimum workable approach, which just lets the user set the compile command to nil to skip compilation, and the relevant window rearrangements afterwards. A fuller solution might be a "after-apply-patch-actions" option, that takes a list like '(compile vc). That could obviate `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch-prefers-magit' because you could just set the list to '(compile magit) instead. But that would require a pretty thorough reworking of the window munging code that comes at the end, and I'd like to just keep this simple. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-Don-t-compile-after-applying-a-patch-if-compile-comm.patch >From 861d000d35f8ed90ed47ce7cff980157d1329408 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Abrahamsen Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:38:31 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Don't compile after applying a patch, if compile command is nil * debbugs-gnu.el (debbugs-gnu-apply-patch): Allow the user to set debbugs-gnu-compile-command to nil to skip the compile step. --- debbugs-gnu.el | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/debbugs-gnu.el b/debbugs-gnu.el index a5453334cd..f4f1fce7da 100644 --- a/debbugs-gnu.el +++ b/debbugs-gnu.el @@ -2612,12 +2612,13 @@ If SELECTIVELY, query the user before applying the patch." (insert-file-contents-literally rej)) (goto-char (point-max)) (save-some-buffers t) - (require 'compile) - (mapc #'kill-process compilation-in-progress) - (compile - (format "cd %s; %s" - debbugs-gnu-current-directory - debbugs-gnu-compile-command)) + (when debbugs-gnu-compile-command + (require 'compile) + (mapc #'kill-process compilation-in-progress) + (compile + (format "cd %s; %s" + debbugs-gnu-current-directory + debbugs-gnu-compile-command))) (let (buf) (if (debbugs-gnu-apply-patch-prefers-magit) (progn @@ -2637,11 +2638,12 @@ If SELECTIVELY, query the user before applying the patch." (delete-other-windows) (switch-to-buffer output-buffer) (split-window) - (split-window) - (other-window 1) - (switch-to-buffer "*compilation*") - (goto-char (point-max)) - (other-window 1) + (when debbugs-gnu-compile-command + (split-window) + (other-window 1) + (switch-to-buffer "*compilation*") + (goto-char (point-max)) + (other-window 1)) (switch-to-buffer buf) (goto-char (point-min))))) -- 2.43.0 --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170763957227235 (code B ref 69017); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2024 08:19:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZ53j-00075D-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:19:32 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:45175) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZ53i-00074r-8y for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:19:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1707639539; x=1708244339; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=6IlX198i6zKrL9O6orpIflb0m7P1tHqdaqbv2ajudRg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=lB8/03WztXRVs1cQb1ZZ6RFkiu+hRihBK69dtdRFf4HT0latDscSY4zm6XFbPJVZ xKsqINBhXsOMbhMPj3T23j2dGseXN5iQ4eVh1hAhedWyUtpjgjaY1C/IeTQdnwT0r FVZGQdBTVjM14SIiTVGOBBZWTw7FnPZL9JPugbRq713oKKQHV3NHzi2uFITJOciMc 8QAv5p8JLxNQCoOces++LfeF+kaD1W+TPNJsuqrsdw/LXAITaTaOIHzWaEwBon1D8 ipQcjjxp/JzeynYVQbvHrFuHdx7eKs4n6m1Pfat3BIXDUUq5w1JCDHMm2zFIlQPLk 9wtMelss7sZsI9cr/Q== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.16]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAfUo-1rfisl0SBE-00B0DS; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:18:59 +0100 From: Michael Albinus In-Reply-To: <878r3sxcrp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:52:42 -0800") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <867cjct6as.fsf@gnu.org> <878r3sxcrp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:18:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87y1brbeh9.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:qIjvHVjHwRYiFw9GECRQX99w9Clx87yQ/9l0BALedyxfcPV/Iar hGgjGZ2w78oVLI9xsMajhyCQL72YM1oSlGLD91SJygJT7zklErWZ5JYqtu2CqBrCTci24Xk um/XuIFcV9V6fIGqC4F1TJOUUwT6OZl5L0oIFvwnsGmNSccP5yyx8nVsKzLltHcRJAaa9dE hrf7DAV4VG83NR2ohmiaQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:FWRgWQZYRGE=;t8Rz5tv2ENvs1OPD2MGFP1KKECI IdoopOlCywMkEYlGs5kLeLXyszy554FUiwvlhVi7R5w0mBUv1pW423oKSU333ijMxtyX5b1DC nBB9J1KdKLDbMQct4FMQ33wqHlDDrDHw7VN6NZfjmxpMy3EjmCPdf92DLX7W8cqKbGRYEi2bd IRPlSPCb7IZ0qeao6Z5HtzY5x/pKjeAitMzwoC02CqOXCTySjC/oDQGm1EIoxqpjwdGDEdBoj lB03sq3WvhXLFsRtljIj6KekT+KhTL4g7hGgNfS7cuEZ7kNsceU6oehxoSgBa7ZAY0F0V+B/8 RV+BRR3xCMcGfkDiliMjx/XljHlNG09OJ4yAIvcEEjWeO7mo/LiMpaH+otpT6KVllXd/g3AVe DFET3ShjYq0PAIppNiXLgdYTdLHv4S+JKr9JUrJN8pX9Ndx8vEeWTaa9fkOuOPaAy0lvOX9QQ bTOIXBy0zRLa9+CWqGgTNnl5DbrmISSilPQTs7IvsYdia6chA4zJSc0NgP8d0Hg7cFeYBmdmI AJB1vblu/bnKCkFMzM+cSJNSg2NPnYQ+N/8l2sPXp9Ep+Xw84YMR+yN++nv5xAgScJrWaGjTc 47OhklIeQzkgCXPd6VNj5d4SqhTN6+hFQQWhOwwqJOr5+rQzgzAys4Vw4+4EmazZH0wzlA/db 5rQWqolQvRWsfQFDSnXGvJ25QW5BCk8yKJvepzj1vE+Zx3j+9DPjmOXmRSbtIixnR21oqE2ak XXcn/ti7e2icQWPMR6nSgvThtv17sQdpzMePcC5wXlbdcTv3dKaUD2vitVg4LxXYcN66Yi9d8 Bq2M4E6WH3vYzYxiDRPrL1mx+cYQixfAAqGt1kWq3d5r6el5Dflq/YtN+YJFfi61vt X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, > I've attached the minimum workable approach, which just lets the user > set the compile command to nil to skip compilation, and the relevant > window rearrangements afterwards. Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, > I've attached the minimum workable approach, which just lets the user > set the compile command to nil to skip compilation, and the relevant > window rearrangements afterwards. Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, > I've attached the minimum workable approach, which just lets the user > set the compile command to nil to skip compilation, and the relevant > window rearrangements afterwards. Looks OK in general. You need to adapt the :type of debbugs-gnu-compile-command, and also to add some few words about in debbugs-ug.texi. Best regards, Michael. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170763992228045 (code B ref 69017); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:26:01 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2024 08:25:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZ59N-0007IF-MR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:25:22 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:39971) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZ4wR-000472-NT for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:12:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1707639095; x=1708243895; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=43qJbLl/tH/BU2JYmp/2n/sxPyKttrdNUmynni0c37k=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=KijteJvdhvppTCo/aB/ILXZjkdkXnduQNbRWA4MsF1/iwFqJ5pH5pJZEFpdlWcOB xnyOBp5tf86x/amK7i3dLJzzuqEusgTeIe13yRxDzyJ0v3363DyO6OOSrHIVDNRDr qkF8ygJHs432gYZ36gyU+QbVrr5UjgS0AkAEd+j4/pGj6E0vnLy6lEzpPKaJTCfZv 979WCmzG/s+qqPZ72Swttou8fOJh6JUE0ilkYLjPf80iaPl+54kkEC3DlTcta/S1m b9LBoCLgaaB9JoNKuJ7zwv3hKpjh5o70HtLFYVblJ6MNsjJrZjloSBI/rF8P4i6/L jQykzj3SBDu5L6YuJw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.16]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MhD2Y-1r4iG519pS-00eM2A; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:11:35 +0100 From: Michael Albinus In-Reply-To: <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:23:30 -0800") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:11:34 +0100 Message-ID: <8734tzcte1.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:aTUoMCvK5lsl522mP93El7aRBAwmPuTCUcO1MYgjjeT36tAXkhf 5nG9CjuvH923Y5FpyC7/RVBqRVTOdlKxPMPAjau1mgRI/r76A4M5F86ErxemofjaXkQLyGt 8tape8xH1Mr4QjhZv3jwfI0ehUNTxrNvzK+DzfgsRK1JduTQuybZGEG7NJRRORtpOCAmNmM lP/weRLTGFYYFm8s6tGzA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:lbsinqOckfw=;V+6Fwb7riJJLlzc8io9YMG4tSak 5f7y7LmN6PE/KnshenT2yNvyH/32bj+tymqk9MqinNYZ88X3y24bsDvwervLb2aI1OMLjWMKn L2nkZBCroHffTTfCOcnoO013szPOr+xYEMrbNxhyouy0YuwdoPXm5WNy9fFVJHrRTb0I86VUH bWvybkMG/G8w0dtKS7p07o1ZbH1fJN2oufojP5hgFz/UISZHGXRiIJxeWyLaE6cyXbS2od+Ti 83OqbSoQWXbos8VmqKDkebgx9udA0WcWIVs20qq96yV76Ela0qVlwoBWgFGZpNouxomNXGUsD 2zaxdbOZthob21tNHIpIeQ6+Zj8Tzn6+hfbO/tDwgtYyXhgLWE1NVJB1OZUVneFs8L5ITn9a9 p/i44U7aXveBNxnaWxy8aWInCTeRNqpkyu/Qp6naV+jMcgz5OC5/czyMuDuKs8gPXwyKc9gFD x0UtPFKWvsdYTuPDHGsWjr0cN0Pk40pmbB7JVNhJgEQJYxwKUgmKupSbxVnAdVbfwUASbT0ZX mgCBQg2g0t2HsU13fjY6FAbqxbxqznl3o//h6Vpn1tlVBsXPwKX7QI4SREVpCgKENOYiVthH+ +XUznuf8EfvPXZMyfQynM+cKNrRxvFMiqUdlX+RWMhFUs3R8ydliSMcINrL0ClYKUdn/QIJET kHn/GhhB7dp51tvVLMH0WcXsFLOqa309/3RsODPO4QmUBD7am3Z02Bj3lne1zmkYqHb3FvO9T P/HWGI6Dijlp2EbCFOLcKjlocyxgMX/F4JhKB88j5VAAj6svNkEENT7Hrhf7ZpXFL7Pms2b8E AulCdPAVq2iC7YbooTJqpDGSwWzBL7J8lA2Sy6iZXqdPOe0Y8OhJm0rHx12OM0rvGl X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, >> I don't use `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' by myself, so I have no opinion >> about. It was written by Lars for his own workflow. > > Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, >> I don't use `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' by myself, so I have no opinion >> about. It was written by Lars for his own workflow. > > Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, >> I don't use `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' by myself, so I have no opinion >> about. It was written by Lars for his own workflow. > > Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying > patches from email->repository? I stupidly use ediff-patch-file (Tools =E2=86=92 Apply Patch =E2=86=92 To a= File...). vc-specific operations I perform in a vc-dir buffer afterwards. That's it. > I have a quick question: the :version tags on the > defcustoms in debbug-gnu.el all seem to refer to Emacs versions, > shouldn't they refer to debbugs package versions? Or is this also a Lars > thing? No, this is a Michael thing :-) We could add :package-version tags to the defcustoms, I've been too lazy until now. > Thanks, > Eric Best regards, Michael. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 15:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170766394611441 (code B ref 69017); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 15:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2024 15:05:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZBOr-0002yS-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:05:45 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:38046) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZBOp-0002y7-G9 for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:05:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9C2DFA0B2; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 15:05:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1707663920; bh=PYvpJWURLTuZNbWQi38dGLjmQ0hXa/Ls7lB6VifseLo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=BxfwLSZHsTlKEYorpbMvrGUrrqAWwRiLBX82uOSrHuAsw/T7rO10c+aFnpOfQAH3a xZnGwcB9T2kQvDWkUqjwrxxC/mgwWrdf1vJIGP+1L3ssdKY5C4SomP8iMGTWmbINkH jcOlMxHSiY4pLKyA1n5xis72DTn4yiVs9deI04Rw= From: Eric Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: <8734tzcte1.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus via's message of "Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:11:34 +0100") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8734tzcte1.fsf@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 07:05:19 -0800 Message-ID: <87zfw7ghxs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Albinus via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > Hi Eric, > >>> I don't use `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' by myself, so I have no opinion >>> about. It was written by Lars for his own workflow. >> >> Out of curiosity, do you use any convenience functions for applying >> patches from email->repository? > > I stupidly use ediff-patch-file (Tools =E2=86=92 Apply Patch =E2=86=92 To= a File...). > vc-specific operations I perform in a vc-dir buffer afterwards. That's it. It's becoming obvious that the real pros just do it by hand! >> I have a quick question: the :version tags on the >> defcustoms in debbug-gnu.el all seem to refer to Emacs versions, >> shouldn't they refer to debbugs package versions? Or is this also a Lars >> thing? > > No, this is a Michael thing :-) > > We could add :package-version tags to the defcustoms, I've been too lazy > until now. Actually it's also partially an Eric thing, I see that :version is documented as specifically referring to Emacs versions. That seems not very meaningful, but I'm also not trying to create extra work for anyone! From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 15:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170766622217136 (code B ref 69017); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 15:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2024 15:43:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56045 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZBza-0004SJ-5B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:43:42 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:57678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZBzX-0004Rx-Hg for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:43:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38E9DFA0B2; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 15:05:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1707663946; bh=YChGbrA9ZTolPdXrscM7P/MAhLQ4GonupBFu+iLIcJM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=HajLe2elnPf8sDdY9mtqyfCKSAFQbnOPOsbmgxFSXGkFBG0a+42cl4S/n2qVv8Y1W QhQXC6JoN57lBCKW0L5Bcu8d4Egu6W+Kk7qeVQdUjP5wRnbvfE91JKUGCmjd3ICbpZ Vqx0PEEq4Oc7cW2p1xTvvdWcOM6UjPK5q5Ml1RfM= From: Eric Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: <87y1brbeh9.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus via's message of "Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:18:58 +0100") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <867cjct6as.fsf@gnu.org> <878r3sxcrp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y1brbeh9.fsf@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 07:05:44 -0800 Message-ID: <87v86vghx3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Albinus via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > Hi Eric, > >> I've attached the minimum workable approach, which just lets the user >> set the compile command to nil to skip compilation, and the relevant >> window rearrangements afterwards. > > Looks OK in general. You need to adapt the :type of > debbugs-gnu-compile-command, and also to add some few words about in > debbugs-ug.texi. Sounds good, I'll do those things and close this up later today. Thanks! From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69017.170766781821642 (code B ref 69017); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 69017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2024 16:10:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57331 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZCPJ-0005cz-T5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:10:18 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:49345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZC4w-0004kO-RF for 69017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:49:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1707666532; x=1708271332; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=RszBiNBfSOfxivcIqokcGZch/kT1+4DJovmDwYc8Ud4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=ga/Lpk7nzwpFZBoy7uS2XnFNsTDA1pPYmJFhFoDSN6/UtZ0NwUQGYuyzXDJDyLxH sFVjxRzbZZBmFQc/omVGOBn+GYkeUQEFZNMk14b7Jz6Nxoy8grm6kYdzaE79Dz++C 4tKv7XSNE5r1R0OhvZdQ5KijJseIOhb+RUeTrYzbinDwKAD4820G2reBVLnpLtadp DlVt8fLgVy2G+F5mAhRAJpWhbbUCZeDZtCebLYjgzipJwA3zyAXyV18RRDMDEQEhj yex+Wq+Jgd73Bb3PeObKwEtpwNjxxMPXsIL+vea+naN6wvflS3SKAmrLMvOJ/3WKW /MhitteNmpewcr/nbA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.16]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N79yG-1quGgI2dEC-017WDy; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:43:30 +0100 From: Michael Albinus In-Reply-To: <87v86vghx3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sun, 11 Feb 2024 07:05:44 -0800") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <867cjct6as.fsf@gnu.org> <878r3sxcrp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y1brbeh9.fsf@gmx.de> <87v86vghx3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:43:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87le7ratwe.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:eaxo9K8jVNeP8jPvqR9riVLAdbgISYPpWBKRZ7xs//8AnfubgAW HoTM75MvCEAyvnAhwL92eauEAm4tQ+V3KZIBnrF/OvfHadC468ilC4u1Xwr22UkxNbLAnjP GQj7YBHWs3J1vXG33TL/RktH62fVjpHDFjpYEkGVHKLYq8dHQJtom3hnsY5E4rRFEfhlTYa TQtl1R9Lrcdw1voSgvCLA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Ocg7cK6i6bQ=;Eul16QNUt4yKUUW5LQyFk0SmnrE UXl2OPXcC0Vr46wjg1avNg2VTly+bA66tZV/haMrncgqeyy+Yde1xBwYRu7LsebXxMvGQvWnq HbHDaKq0pSC1rYOvwF0Txi0iSGFWbdOXvJARys/VZ4Is2gEv8kjnUjNsT/N2O3BoEweTGFc7S h7UmplnfDxGaYeGswp66MJ39GXD7zGltH3nDvy+h8AuDSnDUsEMpurxynAkDxX7sbPXGdy6z+ uM/8RVyvr9q0TRNo2iMKCm/fwWe65+VhYx5NEGlVcjJ4MqzuPEzIKmu4FyfpA0lxB1C7PZjlo drDz1Xeu+n8FoqY4ULnvz/dWyBc9hGeJZ+46apuRO7G/J6BcXLU9lsTODofryQtH4PylPElzZ ZBzCebFW59m1b/RkiRZtLJ4qwdparFPcWmGUqmQMu+BywluuKu871yf8qjfwfdFtgICUI0Kh7 9Y0RIJjmnw4e4rUW/PKcOdpKrun4/IPKlsP52mFOaMeV/p5awM2+jKy1NDYYdd+Mfe9sZOFg2 nDd2XD84iPSretxCZxi47UosplkMKZgF8vExckQzZqn5lSeey8Dbc1NTGUwsXcJehQNjngDTc n2MqPI664LaRXc1KUTIB3vG+LJSARALDbvNRvLS7g0G8upodvIFaWeJM3G+oIK8okcP1g9yF9 REL3WL5K0+YFN07ykslzKPR+aZ5y4DCk06WHmgrqvxhs25ZQNGfcax3qHvxn+sXEI+MQwi4Mz UO7UmwzBM2l9ksvjfYP4KlN+yu1zJo/FAJjXrDC0Iu0QfY26ohnTtJ5y7UlKFcqIzQZ5C6CyB lg4YII6msdngazn0871kWIpLzxSEB/IQ5r8VnlbfFOfmGCJBOjq3b7BVHOiY9Fok/a X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, >> Looks OK in general. You need to adapt the :type of >> debbugs-gnu-compile-command, and also to add some few words about in >> debbugs-ug.texi. > > Sounds good, I'll do those things and close this [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, >> Looks OK in general. You need to adapt the :type of >> debbugs-gnu-compile-command, and also to add some few words about in >> debbugs-ug.texi. > > Sounds good, I'll do those things and close this [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Eric Abrahamsen writes: Hi Eric, >> Looks OK in general. You need to adapt the :type of >> debbugs-gnu-compile-command, and also to add some few words about in >> debbugs-ug.texi. > > Sounds good, I'll do those things and close this up later today. Thanks! If there's nothing else to do, you might also increase the version in debbugs.el to 0.40. Best regards, Michael. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:51:21 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: bug#69017: closed (Re: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch) Message-ID: References: <87ttm9q7o3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 69017 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 69017@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 05:52:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1708062722-10789-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1708062722-10789-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-ap= ply-patch which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 69017@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 69017: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D69017 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1708062722-10789-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 69017-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2024 05:51:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rar7q-0002mf-Fy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:51:06 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:57208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rar7o-0002m9-Dh for 69017-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:51:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56D3EFA183; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 05:50:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1708062638; bh=XFMasnUxi6MyBjgDN4CdIAfK1vl2OVeER8jhanxHSMg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bBtB1QC24u9MVyz5O107GBbffbls6IWwcpT87rsFyKRCYq858Ls5OQt2GgfijyPqw nkzxf691VdptPiepfRjcdRph8mgte7oJlGxMbysM7lCPy3MvgDZqkg854c2Qz3xfWa icXWFsl/C3+QE/EwwoOyMP9f1D+GfK7O1M8Y4nQ0= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: Michael Albinus Subject: Re: bug#69017: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch In-Reply-To: <87le7ratwe.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:43:29 +0100") References: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87plx4b14w.fsf@gmx.de> <87il2wxgwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86bk8ot8zx.fsf@gnu.org> <87eddkxf9b.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <867cjct6as.fsf@gnu.org> <878r3sxcrp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y1brbeh9.fsf@gmx.de> <87v86vghx3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87le7ratwe.fsf@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:50:36 -0800 Message-ID: <87ttm9q7o3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69017-done Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 69017-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) Michael Albinus writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > Hi Eric, > >>> Looks OK in general. You need to adapt the :type of >>> debbugs-gnu-compile-command, and also to add some few words about in >>> debbugs-ug.texi. >> >> Sounds good, I'll do those things and close this up later today. Thanks! > > If there's nothing else to do, you might also increase the version in > debbugs.el to 0.40. Done! Thanks. ------------=_1708062722-10789-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 17:53:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58007 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrXo-0006c0-PX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:53:41 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:42314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrXn-0006bR-G1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:53:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrNV-0007e8-CI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:43:02 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYrNU-0006wJ-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:43:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D3F7FA0B2 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1707586978; bh=M2EA0qbADBmF7n+EjTPNHQFZ9SnzncGLs3AA//fiMbg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=pA1+wSEc/hctpyD0xWtxqaDbxzshC6TGO+H8T636+cQtZ2tBKp7li7SzTm+RWxxoj 1e+1+6/pN0sqrgnjiDs0rjLa5LT5Wn10KlDcDyFd84o3ZP7ZoZL8a5x2aXVo+E/rmM v2YEbMYXoPAwD5R+HLTn+jLeiDofZOWUCrEBbC7o= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 30.0.50; [debbugs] Make compilation step optional in debbugs-gnu-apply-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:42:57 -0800 Message-ID: <877cjcz04e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=52.70.2.18; envelope-from=eric@ericabrahamsen.net; helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) I've started using `debbugs-gnu-apply-patch' regularly, and find it enormously useful -- it's particularly nice that it handles both inline patches and attachments. I don't love the automatic compilation step, though. I pretty much never want to go straight to compilation; it is very long; and the windows are a mess until it finishes. Even the magit/vc step afterwards is often not what I want, as I have Magit already open on Emacs somewhere else. How about some sort of custom option to control this? Either specifically compile-after-apply, or maybe a list of post-apply-actions, something like that? Thanks, Eric ------------=_1708062722-10789-1--