GNU bug report logs - #69010
29.2.50; rcirc-process-regexp doesn't handle the "draft" prefix

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 69010 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Istvan Marko <ebugs <at> kismala.com>
Cc: 69010 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#69010: 29.2.50; rcirc-process-regexp doesn't handle the
 "draft" prefix
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:28:52 +0000

Istvan Marko <ebugs <at> kismala.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Instead of hard-coding "draft", would there be an issue with replacing
>> (0) with `zero-or-more'?
>
> That would work too, just wasn't sure how strict we want the parsing to
> be.

I don't have a strong opinion on the matter either, just considering
alternatives.  The main question I think is if the less strict approach
could cause some other input to be misrecognised.  A secondary question
is what the consequence of a misparsed tag would be.

-- 
Philip Kaludercic

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.