Subject: Re: bug#69010: 29.2.50; rcirc-process-regexp doesn't handle the "draft" prefix

From: Philip Kaludercic <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:28:52 +0000

Istvan Marko <[email-masked]> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> Instead of hard-coding "draft", would there be an issue with replacing
>> (0) with `zero-or-more'?
>
> That would work too, just wasn't sure how strict we want the parsing to
> be.

I don't have a strong opinion on the matter either, just considering
alternatives.  The main question I think is if the less strict approach
could cause some other input to be misrecognised.  A secondary question
is what the consequence of a misparsed tag would be.

-- 
Philip Kaludercic