GNU bug report logs -
#68962
website: directly link the security mail address
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 68962 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 68962 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#68962
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 06 Feb 2024 23:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jonathan Brielmaier <jonathan.brielmaier <at> web.de>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 06 Feb 2024 23:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Is there a reason why we don't link to the mail alias directly on the
security page:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/security/
Because the mailman archive doesn't make really sense for most of the
users as it's only accessible with a password.
What about this small patch?
```
diff --git a/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
b/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
index 8a72950..429e5df 100644
--- a/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
+++ b/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ system|GNU Hurd|GNU Guix package manager|Security
updates") #\|)
`(p
"To report sensitive security issues in Guix itself or the
packages it provides, you can write to the private mailing
list "
- (a (@ (href
"https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-security"))
+ (a (@ (href "mailto:guix-security <at> gnu.org"))
("guix-security <at> gnu.org")) ". This list is monitored by a
small team of Guix developers."))
,(G_
```
Or is this an anti-spam measure?
~Jonathan
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 30 May 2024 13:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jonathan Brielmaier <jonathan.brielmaier <at> web.de>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 30 May 2024 13:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 68962-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Brielmaier <jonathan.brielmaier <at> web.de> writes:
> Is there a reason why we don't link to the mail alias directly on the
> security page:
> https://guix.gnu.org/en/security/
>
> Because the mailman archive doesn't make really sense for most of the
> users as it's only accessible with a password.
>
> What about this small patch?
>
> ```
> diff --git a/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
> b/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
> index 8a72950..429e5df 100644
> --- a/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
> +++ b/website/apps/base/templates/security.scm
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ system|GNU Hurd|GNU Guix package manager|Security
> updates") #\|)
> `(p
> "To report sensitive security issues in Guix itself or the
> packages it provides, you can write to the private mailing
> list "
> - (a (@ (href
> "https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-security"))
> + (a (@ (href "mailto:guix-security <at> gnu.org"))
> ("guix-security <at> gnu.org")) ". This list is monitored by a
> small team of Guix developers."))
> ,(G_
> ```
LGTM. I've pushed it.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 351 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.