GNU bug report logs -
#68895
Difference between trace behavior in guix repl and guile
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Adriel Dumas--Jondeau <leirda <at> disroot.org> writes:
> (guix-user)> ,use (guix scripts build)
> (guix-user)> ,trace (guix-build "hello") ; doesn't output any trace for some reason
It looks like this isn't the only REPL command that doesn't work in
`guix repl`. I haven't done anything close to a full investigation (I am
new to using Guile!), but many other commands simply don't work.
For example, breakpoints are not respected.
`guix repl`:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guix-user)> (define (my-f x) (+ x 1))
scheme@(guix-user)> ,break my-f
Trap 0: Breakpoint at #<procedure my-f (x)>.
scheme@(guix-user)> (my-f 2)
$1 = 3
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
`guile`:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guix-user)> (define (my-f x) (+ x 1))
scheme@(guix-user)> ,break my-f
Trap 0: Breakpoint at #<procedure my-f (x)>.
scheme@(guix-user)> (my-f 2)
$1 = 3
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Neither are tracepoints.
`guix repl`:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guix-user)> (define (my-f x) (+ x 1))
scheme@(guix-user)> ,tracepoint my-f
Trap 0: Tracepoint at #<procedure my-f (x)>.
scheme@(guix-user)> (my-f 2)
$1 = 3
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
`guile`:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> (define (my-f x) (+ x 1))
scheme@(guile-user)> ,tracepoint my-f
Trap 0: Tracepoint at #<procedure my-f (x)>.
scheme@(guile-user)> (my-f 2)
Trap 0: (my-f 2)
Trap 0: 3
$1 = 3
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This bug report was last modified 152 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.