GNU bug report logs - #68881
30.0.50; [PATCH] Field properties confuse 'outline-minor-mode'

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 68881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 68881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: Re: bug#68881: 30.0.50;
 [PATCH] Field properties confuse 'outline-minor-mode'
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:23:37 +0200

> Cc: 68881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 10:22:16 -0800
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
> 
> On 2/7/2024 9:37 AM, Juri Linkov wrote:
> >> The main issue was that outline.el uses 'line-beginning-position' and
> >> friends, which respects field boundaries, but I think we want to avoid that
> >> for 'outline-minor-mode'. Maybe we could use 'pos-bol' and friends instead,
> >> but my understanding is that 'line-beginning-position' respects display
> >> directionality (which we probably want), but 'pos-bol' doesn't.
> > 
> > I'm not aware of any cases that would require restricting
> > outlines to field boundaries.
> 
> Thanks. After reading the source (generally a good idea), I now see that 
> 'line-beginning-position' doesn't respect display directionality, so 
> there's no reason to use it over 'pos-bol' and friends. I've therefore 
> updated the patch to use those, which makes things a bit simpler.
> 
> (In any case, I think for RTL, we'd want to use the logical ordering of 
> the text anyway, but possibly add the outline buttons on the right side 
> of the window instead. That's out of scope for this bug though.)

I don't understand what text directionality has to do with the issue
at hand.  If you elaborate, I could perhaps be of assistance in this
matter.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.