GNU bug report logs - #68842
29.2; implicit declaration of function 'XOpenDisplay'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ulrich Müller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>

Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:04:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.2

Fixed in version 29.3

Done: Ulrich Mueller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: ulm <at> gentoo.org, 68842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#68842: 29.2; implicit declaration of function 'XOpenDisplay'
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 09:38:24 +0200
> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
> Cc: Ulrich Müller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>,  68842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 09:56:59 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Po Lu, any comments to the patch?
> >
> > I don't mind installing this on emacs-29, if it's TRT, but the chances
> > for us to have another Emacs 29.x release are slim at best at this
> > point.  So I wonder whether you should bother.
> 
> I suggest cherry-picking 6c1413d5ef0d1fea639b0d8c83a0c0065d99359b
> instead, because the systems where this flag is required have lapsed out
> of existence.  It can't hurt.

That's not something we do on release branches -- they aren't supposed
to remove platforms or configurations.

So I'd prefer not to do that.  Is the original patch suggested by
Ulrich problematic in some way?  I understand that removing the text
is easier, but assuming we don't want to drop support for GCC 4.6 on
the release branch, do you see any problem in installing the patch
Ulrich posted?




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 104 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.