Subject: Re: bug#6878: bool-vectors of length 0 signal error when aref/aset the 0th element

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:02:41 +0200

> As you wish. Though, I don't think changing the wording solves the
> real problem If there are no good reasons to create a boole-vectro of
> length 0 why allow it?

That's the wrong question. The question is: why not allow them?

> Emacs lisp doesn't and I can think of no good reasons to create 0
> length bool-vectors.
> Can any one else?

The same reasons to create zero-length strings.

        Stefan