From unknown Mon Jun 23 07:48:52 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#68738 <68738@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#68738 <68738@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH 5/7] gnu: linux-libre 5.10: Update to 5.10.209. Reply-To: bug#68738 <68738@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:48:52 +0000 retitle 68738 [PATCH 5/7] gnu: linux-libre 5.10: Update to 5.10.209. reassign 68738 guix-patches submitter 68738 Wilko Meyer severity 68738 normal tag 68738 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 26 10:12:55 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2024 15:12:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTNt1-0006Kc-4C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:12:55 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:48670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTNsy-0006Jb-SA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:12:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTNsj-0004zT-T4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:12:37 -0500 Received: from mail.wmeyer.eu ([95.216.196.112]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTNsg-000299-Ui for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:12:37 -0500 From: Wilko Meyer DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wmeyer.eu; s=mail; t=1706281953; bh=S35l8ffbc41GdVp20CY1Pxf97zBoW2dHcp5qI2sMlOk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=hChTGphzuYcM6ZtZ0KfPs6RmKSsXHFRCP+fGhUKP1IiqFwexbbCV4pCA46J+E4bOu eQD3usQsj4u6ez8V8gae8HYNk4x1Hize4gXcT9OxSY0HvF2ch4oZM+Pi4QWPxpSpSC xDbMwcu2hwsIerNfqcz8aTcrkVs2N/gqpVyQoIxQ= To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 5/7] gnu: linux-libre 5.10: Update to 5.10.209. Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:12:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20240126151222.11209-5-w@wmeyer.eu> In-Reply-To: <20240126151222.11209-1-w@wmeyer.eu> References: <20240126151222.11209-1-w@wmeyer.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.216.196.112; envelope-from=w@wmeyer.eu; helo=mail.wmeyer.eu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Wilko Meyer , leo@famulari.name X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-5.10-version): Update to 5.10.209. (linux-libre-5.10-pristine-source): Update hashes. --- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm index b4e3cf0c70..0a563c013c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ (define-public linux-libre-5.15-pristine-source (%upstream-linux-source version hash) deblob-scripts-5.15))) -(define-public linux-libre-5.10-version "5.10.208") +(define-public linux-libre-5.10-version "5.10.209") (define-public linux-libre-5.10-gnu-revision "gnu1") (define deblob-scripts-5.10 (linux-libre-deblob-scripts @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ (define deblob-scripts-5.10 (base32 "0zmmqj5gyiy2q81f199c29b14isfiqbvl87y72k14yy0q5398276"))) (define-public linux-libre-5.10-pristine-source (let ((version linux-libre-5.10-version) - (hash (base32 "0vpvy47cmcinhs76cjl2n81zrlhbqgpi4v29izn2hzsl15x189ch"))) + (hash (base32 "1mc8rssk5aypgb58jz6i2bbflfr6qh1kgqpam0k8fqvwcjnjzqj4"))) (make-linux-libre-source version (%upstream-linux-source version hash) deblob-scripts-5.10))) -- 2.41.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 26 10:34:32 2024 Received: (at 68738-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2024 15:34:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTODw-00070h-Fl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:34:32 -0500 Received: from mail.wmeyer.eu ([95.216.196.112]:50926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTODu-00070U-JF for 68738-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:34:31 -0500 From: Wilko Meyer DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wmeyer.eu; s=mail; t=1706283258; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; h=From:To:Date; b=dtl5mUifjrpRZKTlrp+VjiYDiLIS15O/8RxPyGSL4OR5zVhBISk/IrV0H81g8Xnyq T1coK1HsBpmZIyX5psZ12bllId2zK48UNQ63mw9LMgV0FqbOtvKceZ01EiX/kLf1OD h/llbXkilV1WVvYN1yQ1e7Qq0AlePzqmkVHpDDUM= To: 68738-done@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:34:01 +0100 Message-ID: <877cjwjeh2.fsf@wmeyer.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68738-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 26 17:22:12 2024 Received: (at 68738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2024 22:22:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52985 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTUaS-0004VZ-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:22:12 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:60571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTUaQ-0004VL-3q for 68738@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:22:10 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150BA5C0382; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:21:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:21:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lassieur.org; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1706307718; x=1706394118; bh=gbMMtM7sR6/xKYnt2lmjbyTIC5uabHtsReoLDsy0Lk4=; b= Mus7QIzMuLb3SdmZgN9bUVBuMXpdCiSgQdvQP73Eo8grjozuIH9GKOGMl76nnRzi gmwlWzgDmnq5xmBXZ1e2xJ2VbCzUBYdVx9Gxe0c1hQHdeVJqtaviGSdNyUi26Yx0 btsUWM5x/Ehrj7MhvRJqnvw/M2XYZFXLMc1MgwTFPqeeTa3AAoVw/Zbl3gclFI1a JkluRJQvSzImmzWilUnzKPkwTrKszy7BELmOgQQD9SxQB/Dv3wOXA3/xX3eLOnZF jCdj/L52aYsPOYrqibmpudxltLV4usVf0MDG1Xo4i79rRNFVr1WXIA7phzS1C9ja UPv1GyfiPKCVaGTcIuw5KA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1706307718; x= 1706394118; bh=gbMMtM7sR6/xKYnt2lmjbyTIC5uabHtsReoLDsy0Lk4=; b=L cvGwWLThxbmx3fNiWHe/rKU5HxYJwqFDAcVi8Aw4qQISwKyBvq9i1zd2lpoqYVe5 O63oIwOStBoid+yFHLszL8ytwqsXbyoNRI13+Kytar3d7+TWGIRU1xqUUmysuOZz Wh5cN6fKNylrz4jJz9Y8CkM9pLxrUQIDj9cl5q6qjXQDh17FY1dsB3v5ruD/wHuG QcJPF0mg6sPr6sI0EdzPTnPVMOtiKed/NjzVLtx14grH7dsQlBY7vDMiii47ynDZ NHHY/syDJs7/z1uNlO0PdGbro15Bi6ZCTxoYT4utcMmPZhD6pzxEt7tyXumZJhak vjmFa9hSO8X/N52J8tJVA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdeljedgudehkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecuogfgmhhpthihufhusghjvggtthculddutddmne cujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpeevlhor mhgvnhhtucfnrghsshhivghurhcuoegtlhgvmhgvnhhtsehlrghsshhivghurhdrohhrgh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieduueehveeitdelleehieevuddtjefgvefhvdetvddu lefhtdehvddvtdeiheeknecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptghlvghmvghntheslhgrshhs ihgvuhhrrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i4c21472a:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:21:56 -0500 (EST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Lassieur?= To: w@wmeyer.eu Subject: Re: bug#68738: (no subject) In-Reply-To: <877cjwjeh2.fsf@wmeyer.eu> (Wilko Meyer's message of "Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:34:01 +0100") References: <20240126151222.11209-5-w@wmeyer.eu> <877cjwjeh2.fsf@wmeyer.eu> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 23:21:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87wmrvwxa6.fsf@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Just a small tip: The point of sending an email to xxxxx-done@debbugs.gnu.org is that you actually send an email explaining why it's closed. If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail control@debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.) Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [66.111.4.28 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [66.111.4.28 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68738 Cc: 68738@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Just a small tip: The point of sending an email to xxxxx-done@debbugs.gnu.org is that you actually send an email explaining why it's closed. If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail control@debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.) Explanations here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html. Of course it's better to explain why a bug report is closed. Cheers, Cl=C3=A9ment From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 27 18:33:27 2024 Received: (at 68738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2024 23:33:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56126 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTsAw-00012b-Nr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:33:27 -0500 Received: from mail.wmeyer.eu ([95.216.196.112]:38520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTsAs-00012L-Ms for 68738@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:33:25 -0500 References: <20240126151222.11209-5-w@wmeyer.eu> <877cjwjeh2.fsf@wmeyer.eu> <87wmrvwxa6.fsf@lassieur.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wmeyer.eu; s=mail; t=1706398388; bh=w3ZGm5zEhFk4+8FefSX28vGUPYi+KCVNeuJlBKvaK4A=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to; b=jgX/GhkWvWFfJ6wKjqzAMRCU/6i0oFq0zllnbVPN87QJki5mC9UmNIStZ+nPpvZJQ aVhF1w/njSzMjq6moS5U8I7pR+Fh/+m42xduwWXzdSGb7ceIjCKG8u/895U1s7AXLZ b59+3lXw3WbS9AJQMSvCScM/vVWU9N9R6xb2wwyk= From: Wilko Meyer To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: bug#68738: (no subject) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 00:24:49 +0100 In-reply-to: <87wmrvwxa6.fsf@lassieur.org> Message-ID: <871qa2s66p.fsf@wmeyer.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Clément, Clément Lassieur writes: > If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail > control@debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close > xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.) > > Explanati [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68738 Cc: w@wmeyer.eu, 68738@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail > control@debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close > xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.) > > Explanations here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html. Thanks for the tip & for taking the time to explain this to me! This would've been the better option (accidentally send a patch-series to guix-patches@debbugs.gnu.org instead of to the specific issue created by the cover letter, so I had to clean up wrongfully created issues) in this case and would've caused less clutter. I'll take some time to read up on the debbugs documentation as I'm not too familiar with it as a tool yet! --=20 Kind regards, Wilko Meyer w@wmeyer.eu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 27 19:37:06 2024 Received: (at 68738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2024 00:37:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTtAY-0002fo-1x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:37:06 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:46913) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTtAS-0002fG-TQ for 68738@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:37:04 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F075F5C0103; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:36:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap46 ([10.202.2.96]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:36:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lassieur.org; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1706402207; x=1706488607; bh=1wVVQKfHmm 5NR0Dv4DUY7hF1WvSoy3U4hZnoMBTtOjg=; b=LT9BenqlRFlpFCTEoyyPPPylyp dKs9xRvf4PM5hXE7xFQiczZ3AqRNvdIvzgwdRLZOThHIpJCaC10nhMNNChdovajJ Nit0u2LI+svoCe1vRoyaEc8Ip0C6d54FpDQPuJwPc2/0w+HTLUolsp9FWY+huwLe yEzdWImZtj54kd1fvcnlA/5mtEwMXU7Yo1Z0HFtZGxxVPH1jn1wsA5egmK21rfAN Ak8ul7MxsO+YgH2EhiZ6ZO7f2qRlT0ZpAVkRh3nsftmvvrtLjH7GdrBvWHdXx08V sKtks3aO56u2eogDjOee8Q48PqRIPaiUjOuHmKrf5THhaik16qYhyMrk5X4g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1706402207; x=1706488607; bh=1wVVQKfHmm5NR0Dv4DUY7hF1WvSo y3U4hZnoMBTtOjg=; b=K5YETLdvwQp1LR/E6IoXpbNXQn85YTPdU6sm65vdRH1O 7qyJuFlBkpyDeGkqjXEkCZrg7XCaVvFU9IeJHu3c1GB8PRxE0J8sNnHFjO7xaoIZ AEIeipuRegCgrOBomn+Z4+84dOmfQfdryu/w9MV3IeOHEp9L2awuXfCT3/Y2BpjI ObB0sDlDCHP/0aCSnDffXF/6Yn0sdpIoSJNem5P8E6+Z2bApX5A2UCNHNZhl5qnZ YHCy1d6mn0ocgwnxRcy5xTlNY4MlCi4yYF+roxXs9aLfCLYRifCnWeOD8HXApaws FE/e+ewagq1DZNO/GJFQo8Q8MHxeGL3g6gj/HNwCLw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrfedttddgvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgogfhmphhthifuuhgsjhgvtghtucdluddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepvehlrohm vghnthcunfgrshhsihgvuhhruceotghlvghmvghntheslhgrshhsihgvuhhrrdhorhhgqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetvddtueeftdeiudehudfgveehfeegfefhleejtdekfeev vedtfefggfekhefgtdenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtlhgvmhgvnhhtsehlrghsshhi vghurhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i4c21472a:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 647492A2008B; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:36:47 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-119-ga8b98d1bd8-fm-20240108.001-ga8b98d1b MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <871qa2s66p.fsf@wmeyer.eu> References: <20240126151222.11209-5-w@wmeyer.eu> <877cjwjeh2.fsf@wmeyer.eu> <87wmrvwxa6.fsf@lassieur.org> <871qa2s66p.fsf@wmeyer.eu> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 00:36:27 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Lassieur?= To: "Wilko Meyer" Subject: Re: bug#68738: (no subject) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f849184fbf754f64a7a944714eadb431 X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well don't worry this happened to all of us ;) Welcome On Sat, Jan 27, 2024, at 11:24 PM, Wilko Meyer wrote: > > Hi Clément, > > Clément Lassieur writes: > > > If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [66.111.4.27 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68738 Cc: 68738@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) --f849184fbf754f64a7a944714eadb431 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well don't worry this happened to all of us ;) Welcome On Sat, Jan 27, 2024, at 11:24 PM, Wilko Meyer wrote: >=20 > Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, >=20 > Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: >=20 > > If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail > > control@debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close > > xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.) > > > > Explanations here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html. >=20 > Thanks for the tip & for taking the time to explain this to me! This > would've been the better option (accidentally send a patch-series to > guix-patches@debbugs.gnu.org instead of to the specific issue created = by > the cover letter, so I had to clean up wrongfully created issues) in > this case and would've caused less clutter. I'll take some time to read > up on the debbugs documentation as I'm not too familiar with it as a > tool yet! >=20 > --=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > Wilko Meyer > w@wmeyer.eu >=20 --f849184fbf754f64a7a944714eadb431 Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well don't worr= y this happened to all of us ;)

Welcome
=

On Sat, Jan 27, 2024, at 11:24 PM, Wilko Meyer= wrote:
Hi Cl=C3=A9ment,

Cl=C3=A9ment L= assieur <clement@lassieur.org= > writes:

> If you don't want to = send an email to human people, you can just mail
> = ;control@debbugs.gnu.org,= with no subject, and with content: "close
> xxxxx".&nb= sp; (It won't get into people's inbox.)
>
> Explanations here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html.
=

Thanks for the tip & for taking the time to expl= ain this to me! This
would've been the better option (acci= dentally send a patch-series to
guix-patches@debbugs.gnu.org instead of to the= specific issue created by
the cover letter, so I had to c= lean up wrongfully created issues) in
this case and would'= ve caused less clutter. I'll take some time to read
up on = the debbugs documentation as I'm not too familiar with it as a
=
tool yet!

-- 
Kind = regards,

Wilko Meyer

--f849184fbf754f64a7a944714eadb431-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 07:48:52 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator