GNU bug report logs -
#68738
[PATCH 5/7] gnu: linux-libre 5.10: Update to 5.10.209.
Previous Next
Reported by: Wilko Meyer <w <at> wmeyer.eu>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:13:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Wilko Meyer <w <at> wmeyer.eu>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 68738 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 68738 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#68738
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:13:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Wilko Meyer <w <at> wmeyer.eu>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:13:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-5.10-version): Update to 5.10.209.
(linux-libre-5.10-pristine-source): Update hashes.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index b4e3cf0c70..0a563c013c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ (define-public linux-libre-5.15-pristine-source
(%upstream-linux-source version hash)
deblob-scripts-5.15)))
-(define-public linux-libre-5.10-version "5.10.208")
+(define-public linux-libre-5.10-version "5.10.209")
(define-public linux-libre-5.10-gnu-revision "gnu1")
(define deblob-scripts-5.10
(linux-libre-deblob-scripts
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ (define deblob-scripts-5.10
(base32 "0zmmqj5gyiy2q81f199c29b14isfiqbvl87y72k14yy0q5398276")))
(define-public linux-libre-5.10-pristine-source
(let ((version linux-libre-5.10-version)
- (hash (base32 "0vpvy47cmcinhs76cjl2n81zrlhbqgpi4v29izn2hzsl15x189ch")))
+ (hash (base32 "1mc8rssk5aypgb58jz6i2bbflfr6qh1kgqpam0k8fqvwcjnjzqj4")))
(make-linux-libre-source version
(%upstream-linux-source version hash)
deblob-scripts-5.10)))
--
2.41.0
Reply sent
to
Wilko Meyer <w <at> wmeyer.eu>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:35:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Wilko Meyer <w <at> wmeyer.eu>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 68738-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#68738
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 68738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Just a small tip:
The point of sending an email to xxxxx-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org is that you
actually send an email explaining why it's closed.
If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close
xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.)
Explanations here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html.
Of course it's better to explain why a bug report is closed.
Cheers,
Clément
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#68738
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 27 Jan 2024 23:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 68738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Clément,
Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:
> If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail
> control <at> debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close
> xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.)
>
> Explanations here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html.
Thanks for the tip & for taking the time to explain this to me! This
would've been the better option (accidentally send a patch-series to
guix-patches <at> debbugs.gnu.org instead of to the specific issue created by
the cover letter, so I had to clean up wrongfully created issues) in
this case and would've caused less clutter. I'll take some time to read
up on the debbugs documentation as I'm not too familiar with it as a
tool yet!
--
Kind regards,
Wilko Meyer
w <at> wmeyer.eu
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#68738
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 28 Jan 2024 00:38:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 68738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Well don't worry this happened to all of us ;)
Welcome
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024, at 11:24 PM, Wilko Meyer wrote:
>
> Hi Clément,
>
> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:
>
> > If you don't want to send an email to human people, you can just mail
> > control <at> debbugs.gnu.org, with no subject, and with content: "close
> > xxxxx". (It won't get into people's inbox.)
> >
> > Explanations here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html.
>
> Thanks for the tip & for taking the time to explain this to me! This
> would've been the better option (accidentally send a patch-series to
> guix-patches <at> debbugs.gnu.org instead of to the specific issue created by
> the cover letter, so I had to clean up wrongfully created issues) in
> this case and would've caused less clutter. I'll take some time to read
> up on the debbugs documentation as I'm not too familiar with it as a
> tool yet!
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Wilko Meyer
> w <at> wmeyer.eu
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 25 Feb 2024 12:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 118 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.