GNU bug report logs -
#68660
29.2; ELPA: Wrong type argument w. multiple maintainers in package-menu-mode
Previous Next
Full log
Message #11 received at 68660 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> 6. Hit the _erc_ button:
>>
>> => describe-package-1: Wrong type argument: char-or-string-p,
>> ("Amin Bandali" . "bandali <at> gnu.org")
>
> I believe this is already fixed in `master`.
> Luckily, this bug does not affect `package-install`.
Hm, I'm starting to suspect this perceived "breakage" may in fact be
intentional (i.e., a "schema evolution"), at least on the /devel
endpoint, given it seems to be reflected in the disparity between
;; /devel/archive-contents
(:maintainer ("Bob Weiner" . "rsw <at> gnu.org")
("Mats Lidell" . "matsl <at> gnu.org"))
and
;; /packages/archive-contents
(:maintainer "Bob Weiner <rsw <at> gnu.org>, Mats Lidell"
. "matsl <at> gnu.org")
And likewise for ./foo-pkg.el in
;; /devel/foo-42.0.tar
(define-package ... :maintainer
'(("Bob Weiner" . "rsw <at> gnu.org") ("Mats Lidell" . "matsl <at> gnu.org")))
vs.
;; /packages/foo-42.0.tar
(define-package ... :maintainer
'("Bob Weiner <rsw <at> gnu.org>, Mats Lidell" . "matsl <at> gnu.org"))
Assuming this isn't a red herring, will this perceived dichotomy hold
going forward? That is, can we count on releases at the /packages
endpoint being of the improper-list variety and not the alist variety
for the foreseeable future? If so, then I guess this bug is much ado
about nothing and can be closed, since ERC 5.6+ will be installable on
27+ in the manner recommended in our docs.
Thanks,
J.P.
This bug report was last modified 308 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.