From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: David Kastrup Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 6861@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1281863550488 (code B ref -1); Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:13:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2010 09:12:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkZGX-00007p-8g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:12:30 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkZGV-00007i-Ty for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:12:28 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:53799) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OkZHQ-0001Vd-Bn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:13:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52444 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkZHP-0008Cg-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:13:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OkZHM-0001VX-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:13:23 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on monty-python X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:50972) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OkZHM-0001VS-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:13:20 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40731 helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkZHL-0001q1-W2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:13:20 -0400 Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF3DE20365; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:13:03 +0200 (CEST) From: David Kastrup Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:13:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5i02q8w.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) I tried using the Scroll Lock Key, and got an error telling me it is unbound. I figured out there was a library scroll-lock and loaded it. The Scroll Lock Key still was unbound, though calling scroll-lock-mode did what I would have expected to be on the scroll lock key. I suggest putting an appropriate autoloaded default global key definition on the Scroll Lock Key, since nothing is gained by not binding it to something useful. If a user happens to have his own different definition, this will override the default anyway. In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1) of 2010-07-12 on lola Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10706000 configured using `configure '--prefix=/usr/local/emacs' '--without-toolkit-scroll-bars' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -fno-crossjumping -g'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Scheme Minor modes in effect: scroll-lock-mode: t diff-auto-refine-mode: t global-semanticdb-minor-mode: t global-semantic-idle-scheduler-mode: t semantic-idle-scheduler-mode: t semantic-mode: t shell-dirtrack-mode: t TeX-PDF-mode: t desktop-save-mode: t minibuffer-electric-default-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: M-x l o a d - l i s c r o l o M-x s c r o l o c m o M-x r e p o r t - e m Recent messages: Loading scroll-lock...done Making completion list... Scroll-Lock mode enabled Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow emacsbug scroll-lock ispell rect diff-mode semantic/tag-file jka-compr semantic/tag-write semantic/bovine semantic/wisent/python semantic/wisent/python-wy semantic/wisent semantic/wisent/wisent semantic/bovine/scm semantic/bovine/scm-by semantic/db-file cedet-files semantic/bovine/c semantic/decorate/include semantic/db-find semantic/db-ref semantic/decorate/mode semantic/decorate pulse semantic/bovine/c-by semantic/lex-spp semantic/bovine/gcc semantic/dep semantic/analyze semantic/sort semantic/scope semantic/analyze/fcn semantic/db-mode semantic/db eieio-base semantic/idle semantic/format ezimage semantic/tag-ls semantic/ctxt semantic/util-modes semantic/util semantic semantic/tag semantic/lex semantic/fw eieio mode-local cedet pp url-mailto url-auth url url-proxy url-privacy url-expand url-methods url-history url-cookie gnus-dup dabbrev multi-isearch help-mode view debug sendmail nndoc tramp-imap assoc tramp-gw tramp-gvfs zeroconf url-util url-parse url-vars dbus xml tramp-fish tramp-smb tramp-cache tramp-ftp tramp-cmds tramp shell tramp-compat trampver browse-url canlock sha1 hex-util newcomment gnus-fun gnus-kill qp sort gnus-cite smiley ansi-color flow-fill mail-extr gnus-async gnus-bcklg gnus-ml disp-table nnfolder parse-time timezone nnnil pop3 nnml nndraft nnmh auth-source netrc gnus-agent gnus-srvr gnus-score score-mode nnvirtual gnus-msg gnus-art mm-uu mml2015 epg-config mm-view smime password-cache dig mailcap nntp gnus-cache gnus-mlspl gnus-sum nnoo gnus-group time-date gnus-undo nnmail mail-source format-spec gnus-start gnus-spec gnus-int gnus-range gnus-win diary-lib diary-loaddefs cal-menu calendar cal-loaddefs info sh-script executable dired-x dired-aux dired message rfc822 mml mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader vc-rcs latexenc preview prv-emacs byte-opt warnings reftex-vcr reftex-dcr reftex-auc reftex reftex-vars tex-bar toolbar-x noutline outline font-latex bytecomp byte-compile latex easy-mmode edmacro kmacro tex-style tex-buf tex-info texinfo tex meta-mode python-21 python cc-mode cc-fonts cc-menus cc-cmds cc-styles cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs vc-git lilypond-mode compile comint regexp-opt ring easymenu scheme package advice help-fns advice-preload desktop minibuf-eldef gnus gnus-ems nnheader gnus-util mail-utils mm-util mail-prsvr wid-edit cus-start cus-load preview-latex tex-site auto-loads server tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process dbusbind dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) -- David Kastrup From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound References: <87r5i02q8w.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> In-Reply-To: <87r5i02q8w.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: David Kastrup Cc: 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15654658403034 (code B ref 6861); Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2019 19:37:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44481 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwXB2-0000ms-5V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 15:37:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com ([209.85.210.181]:37607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwXB1-0000mb-3p for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 15:37:19 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 129so852244pfa.4 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QH+Jq8b6Zpd3I21X4wXKEvdgINQcAEpMVAV+fy9kb5E=; b=BERLaVpIe45wxD3UgCQgfynBy0RRssHDVwNpmSMofmClVPM3UEqI+llwGPHdCrS1W+ Zyhazjto2ZfUQqLCaOTLlTCMYL/6nppx/q/GsjQwPLCTxysva0S98W6FhyQPuDFDOr9q RsTGLAY0FLqrv4a/1Nl7OvV8CLlgIqKabRVATZBa3bo5pU8+O4Ynr5FxtGpgjMG2Qt2K EUWexKw9H8txPV1T1iMpHfiUlT9k3OIaUljMyc7MJaMYbY5hL2DEc6sY8++EzQwMGc1n Qvz6dutajjQMYX9bmMgWh2PEbGplKAmNietpoDSd9gb7m9nanirrHdgb+ZOWs2AbjZmd kE3w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPHpnnMjRFXhBh/tykNKmi5Yc+tL3BlGXP9Tvu1wrttdw6Edc/ xiKLJAw8gyKkxett2TDspWbXls9zfLo1858BBoFIZ9J5l90= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0neDj2rnYF2qksdcy8Po2kKxMXw9/CNqhR26yj2kTXmVBpLEuqVY1vJjZCWweAO9r5biKykuKxeN7KQZSd0o= X-Received: by 2002:a63:69c1:: with SMTP id e184mr22164343pgc.198.1565465833350; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 12:37:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 21:37:03 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) David Kastrup writes: > I tried using the Scroll Lock Key, and got an error telling me it is > unbound. I figured out there was a library scroll-lock and loaded it. > The Scroll Lock Key still was unbound, though calling scroll-lock-mode > did what I would have expected to be on the scroll lock key. > > I suggest putting an appropriate autoloaded default global key > definition on the Scroll Lock Key, since nothing is gained by not > binding it to something useful. If a user happens to have his own > different definition, this will override the default anyway. That sounds reasonable to me. It should be a small job to do it. Does anyone disagree with such a change? Thanks, Stefan Kangas From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: David Kastrup Cc: 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156632135520574 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2019 17:15:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i07je-0005Ll-O0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:15:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com ([209.85.215.181]:34938) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i07jc-0005LX-8u for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:15:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id n4so3608897pgv.2 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6nnsIzowb8WyQ42Kt3B1KSzihBLPIQ3UQSp9q4VxfHs=; b=poDiLsgRiyahBnZ4gTgifxcq8OZ9+56+O5feZnHzj5SuedENoFctuu2I5+DdsoTveT nsI5IhhMY4ZcdOrk0NF+NyGKPkt8eDgsCrlQKikQxtHIx+YEGztwVCt7NrbHDYcQi8gL QM1AjQ6Xq2KezIS0otoyGxxvpVmLVTlGdgQ+3Mo6DoqGqnTX8qkSKLiIM2kISfj+PxEu yjsZdF9j+sfDtiW26sSsEsPW6zSh8bESDJBvBWm7TOBKcLKlbj3e2J/SpTYhCkTUnZJq DOYQuKeKlgfk2LFx9h+tmA3BlbqrLBIg2DQxNz3XWNA2WmKeqq3n0HuwHtibzVbwHxWT JBNg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWynWOV8ffd8KSB8raOaW8tMdEYgwcQ0fAj8H7yKCxqAjEpMWY8 T29x+PGKPigR3no6Zw6V7urDaW4KSW5SybFP73OqMkWM X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwUIS5har4TJ+EbkLB/lduvDcM+fokSYMn00bQa3QUlBau2PtSV/2jvUkcOB00xqggYaaDlhavBzEtxQoWDpuU= X-Received: by 2002:a63:5f01:: with SMTP id t1mr23432323pgb.200.1566321346246; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:15:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:15:34 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="00000000000072a46905908f9b9c" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --00000000000072a46905908f9b9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Stefan Kangas writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> I tried using the Scroll Lock Key, and got an error telling me it is >> unbound. I figured out there was a library scroll-lock and loaded it. >> The Scroll Lock Key still was unbound, though calling scroll-lock-mode >> did what I would have expected to be on the scroll lock key. >> >> I suggest putting an appropriate autoloaded default global key >> definition on the Scroll Lock Key, since nothing is gained by not >> binding it to something useful. If a user happens to have his own >> different definition, this will override the default anyway. > > That sounds reasonable to me. It should be a small job to do it. > Does anyone disagree with such a change? If there are no objections, I'll install the attached patch in a couple of days. I've also included a NEWS entry for this change. Thanks, Stefan Kangas --00000000000072a46905908f9b9c Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0001-Bind-Scroll-Lock-to-scroll-lock-mode-globally.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Bind-Scroll-Lock-to-scroll-lock-mode-globally.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_jzk37rom0 RnJvbSA1YzI5OWU5ODg2MzMzZTYwNmM0MzAwZGViZDlmNjM2M2M3ZDYwNzkxIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5rYW5nYXNAZ21haWwuY29t PgpEYXRlOiBUdWUsIDIwIEF1ZyAyMDE5IDE5OjA0OjE2ICswMjAwClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQQVRDSF0g QmluZCBTY3JvbGwgTG9jayB0byBzY3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RlIGdsb2JhbGx5CgoqIGxpc3AvYmlu ZGluZ3MuZWwgKGdsb2JhbC1tYXApOiBCaW5kIFNjcm9sbF9Mb2NrIHRvCnNjcm9sbC1sb2NrLW1v ZGUuICAoQnVnIzY4NjEpCi0tLQogbGlzcC9iaW5kaW5ncy5lbCB8IDEgKwogMSBmaWxlIGNoYW5n ZWQsIDEgaW5zZXJ0aW9uKCspCgpkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvbGlzcC9iaW5kaW5ncy5lbCBiL2xpc3Av YmluZGluZ3MuZWwKaW5kZXggMGJlMTQ1ODc5OC4uMTZkYTJiZGY5YSAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvbGlz cC9iaW5kaW5ncy5lbAorKysgYi9saXNwL2JpbmRpbmdzLmVsCkBAIC0xMDU0LDYgKzEwNTQsNyBA QCBnbG9iYWwtbWFwCiA7KGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1hcCBbZGVsZXRlXSAnYmFja3dhcmQt ZGVsZXRlLWNoYXIpCiAKIDs7IG5hdHVyYWwgYmluZGluZ3MgZm9yIHRlcm1pbmFsIGtleWNhcHMg LS0tIGRlZmluZWQgaW4gWCBrZXlzeW0gb3JkZXIKKyhkZWZpbmUta2V5IGdsb2JhbC1tYXAgW1Nj cm9sbF9Mb2NrXSAgICAnc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2stbW9kZSkKIChkZWZpbmUta2V5IGdsb2JhbC1tYXAg W0MtUy1iYWNrc3BhY2VdICAna2lsbC13aG9sZS1saW5lKQogKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1h cCBbaG9tZV0JCSdtb3ZlLWJlZ2lubmluZy1vZi1saW5lKQogKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1h cCBbQy1ob21lXQkJJ2JlZ2lubmluZy1vZi1idWZmZXIpCi0tIAoyLjIwLjEKCg== --00000000000072a46905908f9b9c-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 20 13:39:46 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2019 17:39:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i086k-0005v2-GS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:39:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]:35449) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i086i-0005un-PR for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:39:45 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d85so3815847pfd.2 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:39:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MpAAw38B0nExzTZq6eXuVlqeP1839x+IrPh9bjrXnpI=; b=UnItH0hQsZyI3FFnHYEoxzck/LNUMIrW6TQ+CG6emS3xsh4y9zk+I5+vwT3P/bbLo9 KA5o4NgGYkBLPUY17ROQ61xDaeEcY0WILJxRRzheHhTf2O7IKNN9EP6Ny/4TfjKp+0MZ d/Yx8G+WWdTVK1h1fINYM88J/+65eDIsNXdV2kMx9+PAFlln1bv3iklpyUYXfi42GLqe aSTLUZz/KEd06p5ZsElfFMwzFei2m7dyHRB8tzgnej4QKgH8r8zQl1kRaHVPMa5R8iuc xnKCJl72x/BrdwkG5j1rd7uNEAE99E11tl27thCCLSLz2izFHoQZVO9RKupt9WbV34z5 nlSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXLRWc2EHeqqLbG7BGH+zhnRyvILEQ+cTpIMLRRGGFqhM4IP4OS VnyYGpkVxQKv8nHNGgvqwgKKor57dGW63MbzOQ8LWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyLV123AimNbi7l8Kf6kJAfkCsylZNKWF+RyqEqYSzPB7qwhiMHh+Q9RVRqT8zNA+BeuusYOvhicliQYOlw1oQ= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9552:: with SMTP id w18mr30685836pfq.107.1566322778700; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:39:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:39:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tags 6861 + patch quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Stefan Kangas Cc: dak@gnu.org, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156632365632030 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2019 17:54:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Kl-0008KY-R5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43656) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Kk-0008KL-2O for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Ke-0001ql-P6; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:08 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1921 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Kd-0004p6-Rq; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:54:11 +0300 Message-Id: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:15:34 +0200) References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:15:34 +0200 > Cc: 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > > > David Kastrup writes: > > > >> I tried using the Scroll Lock Key, and got an error telling me it is > >> unbound. I figured out there was a library scroll-lock and loaded it. > >> The Scroll Lock Key still was unbound, though calling scroll-lock-mode > >> did what I would have expected to be on the scroll lock key. > >> > >> I suggest putting an appropriate autoloaded default global key > >> definition on the Scroll Lock Key, since nothing is gained by not > >> binding it to something useful. If a user happens to have his own > >> different definition, this will override the default anyway. > > > > That sounds reasonable to me. It should be a small job to do it. > > Does anyone disagree with such a change? > > If there are no objections, I'll install the attached patch in a couple of days. What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier? From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15663257162623 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2019 18:28:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i08rx-0000gD-C5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:28:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]:39425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i08rw-0000fy-1v for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:28:32 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f171.google.com with SMTP id f17so3875151pfn.6 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ayTcySgZs/h/EfXX4Ojhga+ZjS6Y66v8dDT+dfqzQsM=; b=cSgZOZ75ceeGLo5YRcN/TXGI+Oxg9YOc4hi3MbCbaRtorXHl4M93IMZYqCdIP/My+M Ed1Bm/h96m8ltGjb0QEo5HCTUORXJHW66DcpC7HicRJMGuF0z0S8sDr8je/6c2TkDx9U TwZrOLpAVKg0Vp2O8MIe/ow3FCFZp24JW0r4uT2UbXnpAxknH1vmBj4Gl/xuaiPa7Gzm 9mS98gJ9GZD00INkgU+u0VsdMpkuX08rbJBwC+YjmO6QAa2bTxZda6kOWo3dHvCXS0tV WFV4OUiv+XX93tavPNj+48ma6drmR+fpMOla2oeqHzV9SWGnYdfYrcFUV92ctfuZOmxD hvng== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJajxyZbhvtxuqf9LSeHB62Yc1DbZZLt8YKPYXtPW48Bb0S2ah MbRlqi8uzjR1kVfkjs9HtaopNQwruztQWNsSjxc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxbIhIvNqkIsJBzcGOPl4yMjOH0RI+9MuTp20YjQJaeWvtR1znReIAb/yhv7X5irtToEYhbPO6yQ/dQVuykazM= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9552:: with SMTP id w18mr30903252pfq.107.1566325706317; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:28:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:28:15 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > > If there are no objections, I'll install the attached patch in a couple of days. > > What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier? I'm unfortunately not familiar with that at all, since I never use Windows. Nor do I currently have access to any Windows boxes for testing. Would this patch break something on w32, or would it just not work there? Thanks, Stefan Kangas From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Stefan Kangas Cc: dak@gnu.org, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15664061908458 (code B ref 6861); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:50:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2019 16:49:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36418 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tny-0002CL-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tnw-0002By-Hs for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tnr-0004Zb-Ca; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:43 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1958 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tno-00072J-9e; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:49:47 +0300 Message-Id: <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:28:15 +0200) References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:28:15 +0200 > Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > > > What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier? > > I'm unfortunately not familiar with that at all, since I never use > Windows. Nor do I currently have access to any Windows boxes for > testing. Would this patch break something on w32, or would it just > not work there? It might not work if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to have ScrollLock act as a modifier key. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15669089284584 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2019 12:28:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2aae-0001Bs-Jc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:28:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f176.google.com ([209.85.210.176]:34041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2aad-0001Bb-0a for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:28:47 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f176.google.com with SMTP id b24so14065923pfp.1 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/MX8uJeXl2r6aO/eBUiECb+1oAUlWyXYRuvE6h16eYw=; b=iHgqC80wc7udRzLqJecHMNI4UDHwRu2Js85ORTIXFpp2N2hSAypDpUb4EyvDo1ViHH vUjojTsDua4WtdzBPv8uag2sBrE92K79z+QvYcU3Bf6C5F5iXpIKiUn2Y5j9ZEFESlOO wtxuFi8Xoa2/0Kcb8L4z87y3zgJKhoHofFxvHyuUTJy0U2GpS9pnbOe3u2iicthE5R1T jboA5nZcXm3l2xJm6Ism8LO6+/UG3cnVCNd8jge88yq/7vzPk9hZ62sClputeI3N1Xr/ DqoRBlc5oMczZOOqqXHXN0TF32fEMq440Qa/4yi+7rFtDKs3pmkQhwHQKKWSrpPgNGsh wd3g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAViryXkp+HVzE2TBbjkJMhi3pNCknteDq2ko/JaO5h7+N2TkRKx jwxCYnomOpca0rlxsvkHfosAeBNNjDcqcEIq89k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwalV7cofLMJBUPmTnvcqymdgtq5iK5q0/OTLM53fglJ+Mui78g62Tfqpkbadc5LA+iQ16iumdYIWN0QlfeQeI= X-Received: by 2002:a63:4c5c:: with SMTP id m28mr22138534pgl.333.1566908921181; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:28:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:28:30 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier? > > > > I'm unfortunately not familiar with that at all, since I never use > > Windows. Nor do I currently have access to any Windows boxes for > > testing. Would this patch break something on w32, or would it just > > not work there? > > It might not work if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to have > ScrollLock act as a modifier key. Could someone with access to a Windows machine please test this patch? Thanks, Stefan Kangas From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Stefan Kangas Cc: dak@gnu.org, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156690964213787 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2019 12:40:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47845 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2am9-0003aI-Mi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:40:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2am8-0003a5-03 for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:40:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2am2-0004tT-JP; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:40:34 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3364 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i2am1-0001Na-MR; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:40:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:40:35 +0300 Message-Id: <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:28:30 +0200) References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:28:30 +0200 > Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier? > > > > > > I'm unfortunately not familiar with that at all, since I never use > > > Windows. Nor do I currently have access to any Windows boxes for > > > testing. Would this patch break something on w32, or would it just > > > not work there? > > > > It might not work if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to have > > ScrollLock act as a modifier key. > > Could someone with access to a Windows machine please test this patch? I can, but I'm not sure I understand what you'd like to test. With the default value of w32-scroll-lock-modifier your patch will definitely work; with w32-scroll-lock-modifier customized to some modifier, like 'super, it will certainly NOT work. So I think we need to tell Windows users that this binding won't work if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to a n on-nil value. Any suggestions for where to document that? From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: David Kastrup Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Stefan Kangas , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156691084915635 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:01:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2019 13:00:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47857 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2b5c-000446-Na for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:00:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2b5a-00043t-Lu for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:00:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2b5V-0005NC-6B; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0400 Received: from x4e315fde.dyn.telefonica.de ([78.49.95.222]:44432 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i2b5U-0002EC-5q; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:00:40 -0400 From: David Kastrup References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:00:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:40:35 +0300") Message-ID: <87lfve7ogb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan Kangas >> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:28:30 +0200 >> Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > > > What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier? >> > > >> > > I'm unfortunately not familiar with that at all, since I never use >> > > Windows. Nor do I currently have access to any Windows boxes for >> > > testing. Would this patch break something on w32, or would it just >> > > not work there? >> > >> > It might not work if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to have >> > ScrollLock act as a modifier key. >> >> Could someone with access to a Windows machine please test this patch? > > I can, but I'm not sure I understand what you'd like to test. With > the default value of w32-scroll-lock-modifier your patch will > definitely work; with w32-scroll-lock-modifier customized to some > modifier, like 'super, it will certainly NOT work. > > So I think we need to tell Windows users that this binding won't work > if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to a n on-nil value. Any > suggestions for where to document that? According to Git's logs, w32-scroll-lock-modifier keyboard support was apparently originally contributed by Geoff Voelker in 1999 (he has not been active since that year) and subsequently maintained and documented by you (last documentation changes in 2016). For better or worse, that probably makes you by far the best candidate for documenting (and/or possibly even for fixing) the interactions of w32-scroll-lock-modifier with default activations of the Scroll Lock keybindings on non-Windows systems. -- David Kastrup From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: David Kastrup Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156691786628030 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2019 14:57:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49285 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2cun-0007I1-Kx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:57:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37683) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2cum-0007Hm-5n for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:57:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2cuf-0002fm-6Z; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:57:38 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3768 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i2cua-0001mE-0D; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:57:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:57:35 +0300 Message-Id: <837e6yejvk.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87lfve7ogb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:00:36 +0200) References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfve7ogb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: David Kastrup > Cc: Stefan Kangas , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:00:36 +0200 > > According to Git's logs, w32-scroll-lock-modifier keyboard support was > apparently originally contributed by Geoff Voelker in 1999 (he has not > been active since that year) and subsequently maintained and documented > by you (last documentation changes in 2016). For better or worse, that > probably makes you by far the best candidate for documenting (and/or > possibly even for fixing) the interactions of w32-scroll-lock-modifier > with default activations of the Scroll Lock keybindings on non-Windows > systems. What if the best candidate doesn't necessarily have time for doing everything for which he/she is the best candidate? Does the best candidate then get to be able to ask someone else to do it? From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: David Kastrup Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156693311021995 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2019 19:11:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49437 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2gsg-0005if-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:11:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2gse-0005iJ-2i for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:11:49 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2gsY-0001xC-OH; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:11:42 -0400 Received: from x4e315fde.dyn.telefonica.de ([78.49.95.222]:45926 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i2gsX-0004so-Uk; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:11:42 -0400 From: David Kastrup References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfve7ogb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837e6yejvk.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:11:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <837e6yejvk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:57:35 +0300") Message-ID: <87ef16779w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: David Kastrup >> Cc: Stefan Kangas , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:00:36 +0200 >> >> According to Git's logs, w32-scroll-lock-modifier keyboard support was >> apparently originally contributed by Geoff Voelker in 1999 (he has not >> been active since that year) and subsequently maintained and documented >> by you (last documentation changes in 2016). For better or worse, that >> probably makes you by far the best candidate for documenting (and/or >> possibly even for fixing) the interactions of w32-scroll-lock-modifier >> with default activations of the Scroll Lock keybindings on non-Windows >> systems. > > What if the best candidate doesn't necessarily have time for doing > everything for which he/she is the best candidate? Does the best > candidate then get to be able to ask someone else to do it? Nobody gets to ask someone else to do anything regarding free software unless paying them for it. In the end, that means that most features and ports get maintained by those interested in the particular port and/or feature. The quality of the Windows port, like all ports, stands and falls with the interest of those investing time and energy into it. Blocking useful features for free platforms because of interference with non-standard settings of Windows-only special features is something that does not make a lot of sense within the frame of the GNU project. If you have a concrete proposal of what to do better other than "don't touch this code", based on your relative acquaintance with it, that would likely go a long way towards keeping things running also on W32. -- David Kastrup From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: David Kastrup Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156693372223061 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:23:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2019 19:22:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49441 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2h2X-0005zo-Eo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:22:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2h2V-0005zW-TU for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:22:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2h2O-000899-EW; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:21:52 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4203 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i2h2N-0005dB-12; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:21:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:21:52 +0300 Message-Id: <83zhjuct2n.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87ef16779w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:11:39 +0200) References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfve7ogb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837e6yejvk.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef16779w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: David Kastrup > Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:11:39 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: David Kastrup > >> Cc: Stefan Kangas , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:00:36 +0200 > >> > >> According to Git's logs, w32-scroll-lock-modifier keyboard support was > >> apparently originally contributed by Geoff Voelker in 1999 (he has not > >> been active since that year) and subsequently maintained and documented > >> by you (last documentation changes in 2016). For better or worse, that > >> probably makes you by far the best candidate for documenting (and/or > >> possibly even for fixing) the interactions of w32-scroll-lock-modifier > >> with default activations of the Scroll Lock keybindings on non-Windows > >> systems. > > > > What if the best candidate doesn't necessarily have time for doing > > everything for which he/she is the best candidate? Does the best > > candidate then get to be able to ask someone else to do it? > > Nobody gets to ask someone else to do anything regarding free software > unless paying them for it. In the end, that means that most features > and ports get maintained by those interested in the particular port > and/or feature. > > The quality of the Windows port, like all ports, stands and falls with > the interest of those investing time and energy into it. Blocking > useful features for free platforms because of interference with > non-standard settings of Windows-only special features is something that > does not make a lot of sense within the frame of the GNU project. > > If you have a concrete proposal of what to do better other than "don't > touch this code", based on your relative acquaintance with it, that > would likely go a long way towards keeping things running also on W32. You've made a huge mountain out of a molehill. All I did was review a patch and provide comments to make it better. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15695200926623 (code B ref 6861); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2019 17:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44715 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDXsA-0001ih-1d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:48:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]:46304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDXs8-0001iG-5L for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:48:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id a3so1913852pgm.13 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tD9Zs3R5McXMA3SFxVUlLppj3k6N7TVIIfvqewkK+uk=; b=Ru+RvxpPbPXIMuEa+WFq2sHbetymmJ8xISQBTJwzWLWGa0ev+WRhj/8XvzjwRZKLyU BavUW+8FP8FsneG9zF3VCIlofiN9pRaIzLrNoPPhfz+W0PEkdcCtR+kNmeyPbn7i6gdE zjs14HEjTJonLgbc4ZvUuq9Y4R5oZq4KREu3jZKXslJrVjoGMb9vgPqXIr/iEH9s7ewK p2HeXpYAkmJ1+rM6NeBQ/6SPtVpkWcNlK0yJubKOKus94jXs3jgnFs32AOrOHj+Qr6Gw V2huzJi7VVmlqAHB2Olkl9JvtNA/Q1IyWqa32lWzwGXw0lj9lgKFNaaQYNqdBnu9XrNJ J/IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWX2QMHblpqzSybKZukPV5GmyTEb22Pk/IPTOwl/foHyA2odd5O kW+LfCyoMrUySstwEzo81gJRvyn2lMdN/frwei8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQkumaH//5yR/cPXZCbJb1ZMFHq+MzrXf5r7lKpj3W92CyFEd/Cde5ITzEJDOR3m4+yr2wX4sIm18t4p1XZJY= X-Received: by 2002:a63:720f:: with SMTP id n15mr4431519pgc.198.1569520081435; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:48:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:47:50 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Could someone with access to a Windows machine please test this patch? > > I can, but I'm not sure I understand what you'd like to test. With > the default value of w32-scroll-lock-modifier your patch will > definitely work; with w32-scroll-lock-modifier customized to some > modifier, like 'super, it will certainly NOT work. Got it. > So I think we need to tell Windows users that this binding won't work > if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to a n on-nil value. Any > suggestions for where to document that? I'm not so sure what would be a good place to do it. For starters, I can't find any reference to w32-scroll-lock-modifier in the manual, and I'm not sure if that's on purpose. To my mind, it would be enough to add it to the NEWS entry. Alternatively, we could add a section on scroll-lock-mode to (info "(emacs) Auto Scrolling") and document it there. (Although I'm not sure it makes sense given that w32-scroll-lock-modifier is not mentioned anywhere else...) WDYT? Best regards, Stefan Kangas From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Stefan Kangas Cc: dak@gnu.org, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156952084310329 (code B ref 6861); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:01:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2019 18:00:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDY4F-0002cj-7f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:00:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54603) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDY49-0002TY-Vm for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:00:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDY44-00041D-OP; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:00:28 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2923 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iDY3z-000724-7i; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:00:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 21:00:09 +0300 Message-Id: <83ef03kkeu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:47:50 +0200) References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:47:50 +0200 > Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > > > So I think we need to tell Windows users that this binding won't work > > if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to a n on-nil value. Any > > suggestions for where to document that? > > I'm not so sure what would be a good place to do it. For starters, I > can't find any reference to w32-scroll-lock-modifier in the manual, > and I'm not sure if that's on purpose. Try the other manual, emacs.info. > To my mind, it would be enough to add it to the NEWS entry. I think it should be in the doc string of that mode as well. Thanks. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15696700297152 (code B ref 6861); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:28:01 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2019 11:27:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEAsX-0001rI-1e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:27:09 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:33466) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEAsU-0001qm-03 for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:27:07 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d22so2076705pls.0 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 04:27:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fwtyTxyOmLE99gRMxfnHEtZYzmLy8vsWZNfRyaPWT7s=; b=B/0uNb6+7j6k8LHXssWUrnbr+N5gRB8xrStY+dsYjieMZrrhg24mkHmp18y7C7uVLx srOg92mqmF3RbxfJw3lwqjqRZH8vWM9pxZ7yunUrpvJ7tlL+PGBqO9xTa06H6VKUshzX rfyQ1w8Z5MEsV4LLYociDuAjZuzs5eIvKEiUjOoGTRfmSdaCiDHrjPsJt+LW9SPNfVmH AVAbIzlRqfV3/BQu8Ls4Iwn9JLehMCXeaPH01dgCL08l2jGFTJe9GnMZqRuCpUgvBH50 X1EgGLSPmDq9t+kVbBMZ0cvpOLXbtip7CeQ9SF6GIwAINa+/6Psua+4JiqiNyiSh+Pfa BbXg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/uGqT9SHrOn/1p0li5PMOD4HuLHyEfr08Yin6v8/1XU78LfjC fQHmVbu5tubi+J6tI/PtHzSCmV0yPjElAWgWVrGE5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxzsbPTnnIby+Rcws+UFfQKVpHlrU8LCHZ4k25Y74Em0RZdNhfQ7TBVld+ZP7e4Jmfo222Fq3nyhYyZdFr6JUQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d88f:: with SMTP id b15mr9498639plz.251.1569670019774; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 04:26:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef03kkeu.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83ef03kkeu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:26:48 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000f19f2b05939b477f" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) --000000000000f19f2b05939b477f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So I think we need to tell Windows users that this binding won't work > > > if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to a n on-nil value. Any > > > suggestions for where to document that? > > > > I'm not so sure what would be a good place to do it. For starters, I > > can't find any reference to w32-scroll-lock-modifier in the manual, > > and I'm not sure if that's on purpose. > > Try the other manual, emacs.info. Thanks, found it now. Not sure how I missed it before. > > To my mind, it would be enough to add it to the NEWS entry. > > I think it should be in the doc string of that mode as well. OK. How about the attached patch? Best regards, Stefan Kangas --000000000000f19f2b05939b477f Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0001-Bind-Scroll_Lock-to-scroll-lock-mode-globally.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Bind-Scroll_Lock-to-scroll-lock-mode-globally.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_k13gzk4c0 RnJvbSA5ZWI4Mjk5ZDQ3NmRhNmNmMTkwOTg1Mzk0YzM3MzMxYzlmNWVlMjI0IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5rYW5nYXNAZ21haWwuY29t PgpEYXRlOiBUdWUsIDIwIEF1ZyAyMDE5IDE5OjA0OjE2ICswMjAwClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQQVRDSF0g QmluZCBTY3JvbGxfTG9jayB0byBzY3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RlIGdsb2JhbGx5CgoqIGxpc3AvYmlu ZGluZ3MuZWwgKGdsb2JhbC1tYXApOiBCaW5kIFNjcm9sbF9Mb2NrIHRvCnNjcm9sbC1sb2NrLW1v ZGUuICAoQnVnIzY4NjEpCiogbGlzcC9zY3JvbGwtbG9jay5lbCAoc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2stbW9kZSk6 IE5vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgYmluZGluZyB3aWxsCm5vdCB3b3JrIGlmICd3MzItc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2st bW9kaWZpZXInIGlzIG5vbi1uaWwuCiogZXRjL05FV1M6IEFubm91bmNlIGl0LgotLS0KIGV0Yy9O RVdTICAgICAgICAgICAgfCA1ICsrKysrCiBsaXNwL2JpbmRpbmdzLmVsICAgIHwgMSArCiBsaXNw L3Njcm9sbC1sb2NrLmVsIHwgNSArKysrLQogMyBmaWxlcyBjaGFuZ2VkLCAxMCBpbnNlcnRpb25z KCspLCAxIGRlbGV0aW9uKC0pCgpkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvZXRjL05FV1MgYi9ldGMvTkVXUwppbmRl eCA1NmU1ZmQyZjgzLi5mNjdkYTBjYmJlIDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9ldGMvTkVXUworKysgYi9ldGMv TkVXUwpAQCAtNDE5LDYgKzQxOSwxMSBAQCBSR0IgdHJpcGxldHMgd2l0aCBhIHNpbmdsZSBoZXhh ZGVjaW1hbCBkaWdpdCBwZXIgY29tcG9uZW50LgogLS0tCiAqKiBUaGUgdG9vbGJhciBub3cgc2hv d3MgdGhlIGVxdWl2YWxlbnQga2V5IGJpbmRpbmcgaW4gaXRzIHRvb2x0aXBzLgogCistLS0KKyoq ICdzY3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RlJyBpcyBub3cgYm91bmQgdG8gdGhlICdTY3JvbGxfTG9jaycga2V5 IGdsb2JhbGx5LgorTm90ZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMga2V5IGJpbmRpbmcgd2lsbCBub3Qgd29yayBvbiBX aW5kb3dzIHN5c3RlbXMgaWYKKyd3MzItc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2stbW9kaWZpZXInIGlzIG5vbi1uaWwu CisKIAwKICogRWRpdGluZyBDaGFuZ2VzIGluIEVtYWNzIDI3LjEKIApkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvbGlz cC9iaW5kaW5ncy5lbCBiL2xpc3AvYmluZGluZ3MuZWwKaW5kZXggMGJlMTQ1ODc5OC4uMTZkYTJi ZGY5YSAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvbGlzcC9iaW5kaW5ncy5lbAorKysgYi9saXNwL2JpbmRpbmdzLmVs CkBAIC0xMDU0LDYgKzEwNTQsNyBAQCBnbG9iYWwtbWFwCiA7KGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1h cCBbZGVsZXRlXSAnYmFja3dhcmQtZGVsZXRlLWNoYXIpCiAKIDs7IG5hdHVyYWwgYmluZGluZ3Mg Zm9yIHRlcm1pbmFsIGtleWNhcHMgLS0tIGRlZmluZWQgaW4gWCBrZXlzeW0gb3JkZXIKKyhkZWZp bmUta2V5IGdsb2JhbC1tYXAgW1Njcm9sbF9Mb2NrXSAgICAnc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2stbW9kZSkKIChk ZWZpbmUta2V5IGdsb2JhbC1tYXAgW0MtUy1iYWNrc3BhY2VdICAna2lsbC13aG9sZS1saW5lKQog KGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1hcCBbaG9tZV0JCSdtb3ZlLWJlZ2lubmluZy1vZi1saW5lKQog KGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1hcCBbQy1ob21lXQkJJ2JlZ2lubmluZy1vZi1idWZmZXIpCmRp ZmYgLS1naXQgYS9saXNwL3Njcm9sbC1sb2NrLmVsIGIvbGlzcC9zY3JvbGwtbG9jay5lbAppbmRl eCAzYTc0YzExYjdhLi5kODRkMTM1NjRhIDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9saXNwL3Njcm9sbC1sb2NrLmVs CisrKyBiL2xpc3Avc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2suZWwKQEAgLTU0LDcgKzU0LDEwIEBAIHNjcm9sbC1sb2Nr LW1vZGUKIFdoZW4gZW5hYmxlZCwga2V5cyB0aGF0IG5vcm1hbGx5IG1vdmUgcG9pbnQgYnkgbGlu ZSBvciBwYXJhZ3JhcGgKIHdpbGwgc2Nyb2xsIHRoZSBidWZmZXIgYnkgdGhlIHJlc3BlY3RpdmUg YW1vdW50IG9mIGxpbmVzIGluc3RlYWQKIGFuZCBwb2ludCB3aWxsIGJlIGtlcHQgdmVydGljYWxs eSBmaXhlZCByZWxhdGl2ZSB0byB3aW5kb3cKLWJvdW5kYXJpZXMgZHVyaW5nIHNjcm9sbGluZy4i Citib3VuZGFyaWVzIGR1cmluZyBzY3JvbGxpbmcuCisKK05vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgZGVmYXVsdCBr ZXkgYmluZGluZyB0byBTY3JvbGxfTG9jayB3aWxsIG5vdCB3b3JrIG9uCitXaW5kb3dzIHN5c3Rl bXMgaWYgYHczMi1zY3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RpZmllcicgaXMgbm9uLW5pbC4iCiAgIDpsaWdodGVy ICIgU2NyTGNrIgogICA6a2V5bWFwIHNjcm9sbC1sb2NrLW1vZGUtbWFwCiAgIChpZiBzY3JvbGwt bG9jay1tb2RlCi0tIAoyLjIwLjEKCg== --000000000000f19f2b05939b477f-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 12:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Stefan Kangas Cc: dak@gnu.org, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156967287919109 (code B ref 6861); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 12:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2019 12:14:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49438 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEBcV-0004y9-Hj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:14:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEBcU-0004xx-8k for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:14:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEBcL-0002Hz-TY; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:14:30 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2852 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iEBcF-0007sz-1N; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:14:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:14:16 +0300 Message-Id: <83sgoghb3b.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:26:48 +0200) References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef03kkeu.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:26:48 +0200 > Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > To my mind, it would be enough to add it to the NEWS entry. > > > > I think it should be in the doc string of that mode as well. > > OK. How about the attached patch? It's fine, but please say "MS-Windows" to be more precise. Thanks. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156967633924817 (code B ref 6861); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2019 13:12:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iECWJ-0006SD-BL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 09:12:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170]:41314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iECWG-0006Rx-T0 for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 09:12:17 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id s1so4887732pgv.8 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 06:12:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ed06+mvwnQ+qj+lkhiAwQrOKDqqp2+V1pFacR0vf+2k=; b=cPBKoMVQtd1tPERC/WxwSWbRWVuQrnbMk29M7GMUU4gtw2ON+tfYC0K8motqTATyDY b5yBGkQtyvX2Nz++HsIdaW3N9VqaCmKOn2jo69oWpAcyCwNM0Wlz6dyigZtxoJMnGmAa 8ILeNmwbSGAoQCkPddxvZJJU/54cc3eNu/kQGTqCAiDcCSZP+waGlyYNBP3Qdi7QhCh8 WZZcSXIxIxE6tKv2N2c/us5EYATa0yd9onIlD2iK7NJbRy0R0G/6IMH2AIZc09cePyDO ACa1hy8VVx7aUxfXNWCTVv+4cVcIsEqIJg2rDeutEQOeEy0g6U6m4djld5I/jj4m69YV 5U0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUF7KGNV1cmzsUpLNR7cHoinKPvGgt8jT0vWgQVrYujQNaXGW6X pdIuSEMEBYcW3/tO7qok6DfSBxRYTledd9RczZBksQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx51Dbx5Lep5YEw5uN81+F+fuVVey3G2aHmo8QwIVldEwMs1ldckPeM7kaWe6LxEL0X/VAoA8RvS08mK3voxlg= X-Received: by 2002:a63:1310:: with SMTP id i16mr13598909pgl.200.1569676331085; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 06:12:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef03kkeu.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgoghb3b.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83sgoghb3b.fsf@gnu.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:11:59 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000209caf05939cc070" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) --000000000000209caf05939cc070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Eli Zaretskii writes: > > OK. How about the attached patch? > > It's fine, but please say "MS-Windows" to be more precise. Thanks; fixed in attached patch. I'll push it in a couple of days if there are no further comments. Best regards, Stefan Kangas --000000000000209caf05939cc070 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0001-Bind-Scroll_Lock-to-scroll-lock-mode-globally.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Bind-Scroll_Lock-to-scroll-lock-mode-globally.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_k13kpzn00 RnJvbSA0ZTQ1YWU3NGJmZmQ5YzRmOGZmODQyN2ViNGM0MWNmZWUxNjdiM2YxIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5rYW5nYXNAZ21haWwuY29t PgpEYXRlOiBUdWUsIDIwIEF1ZyAyMDE5IDE5OjA0OjE2ICswMjAwClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQQVRDSF0g QmluZCBTY3JvbGxfTG9jayB0byBzY3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RlIGdsb2JhbGx5CgoqIGxpc3AvYmlu ZGluZ3MuZWwgKGdsb2JhbC1tYXApOiBCaW5kIFNjcm9sbF9Mb2NrIHRvCnNjcm9sbC1sb2NrLW1v ZGUuICAoQnVnIzY4NjEpCiogbGlzcC9zY3JvbGwtbG9jay5lbCAoc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2stbW9kZSk6 IE5vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgYmluZGluZyB3aWxsCm5vdCB3b3JrIGlmICd3MzItc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2st bW9kaWZpZXInIGlzIG5vbi1uaWwuCiogZXRjL05FV1M6IEFubm91bmNlIGl0LgotLS0KIGV0Yy9O RVdTICAgICAgICAgICAgfCA1ICsrKysrCiBsaXNwL2JpbmRpbmdzLmVsICAgIHwgMSArCiBsaXNw L3Njcm9sbC1sb2NrLmVsIHwgNSArKysrLQogMyBmaWxlcyBjaGFuZ2VkLCAxMCBpbnNlcnRpb25z KCspLCAxIGRlbGV0aW9uKC0pCgpkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvZXRjL05FV1MgYi9ldGMvTkVXUwppbmRl eCA1NmU1ZmQyZjgzLi42MGI1ODMyMDBhIDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9ldGMvTkVXUworKysgYi9ldGMv TkVXUwpAQCAtNDE5LDYgKzQxOSwxMSBAQCBSR0IgdHJpcGxldHMgd2l0aCBhIHNpbmdsZSBoZXhh ZGVjaW1hbCBkaWdpdCBwZXIgY29tcG9uZW50LgogLS0tCiAqKiBUaGUgdG9vbGJhciBub3cgc2hv d3MgdGhlIGVxdWl2YWxlbnQga2V5IGJpbmRpbmcgaW4gaXRzIHRvb2x0aXBzLgogCistLS0KKyoq ICdzY3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RlJyBpcyBub3cgYm91bmQgdG8gdGhlICdTY3JvbGxfTG9jaycga2V5 IGdsb2JhbGx5LgorTm90ZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMga2V5IGJpbmRpbmcgd2lsbCBub3Qgd29yayBvbiBN Uy1XaW5kb3dzIHN5c3RlbXMgaWYKKyd3MzItc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2stbW9kaWZpZXInIGlzIG5vbi1u aWwuCisKIAwKICogRWRpdGluZyBDaGFuZ2VzIGluIEVtYWNzIDI3LjEKIApkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEv bGlzcC9iaW5kaW5ncy5lbCBiL2xpc3AvYmluZGluZ3MuZWwKaW5kZXggMGJlMTQ1ODc5OC4uMTZk YTJiZGY5YSAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvbGlzcC9iaW5kaW5ncy5lbAorKysgYi9saXNwL2JpbmRpbmdz LmVsCkBAIC0xMDU0LDYgKzEwNTQsNyBAQCBnbG9iYWwtbWFwCiA7KGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFs LW1hcCBbZGVsZXRlXSAnYmFja3dhcmQtZGVsZXRlLWNoYXIpCiAKIDs7IG5hdHVyYWwgYmluZGlu Z3MgZm9yIHRlcm1pbmFsIGtleWNhcHMgLS0tIGRlZmluZWQgaW4gWCBrZXlzeW0gb3JkZXIKKyhk ZWZpbmUta2V5IGdsb2JhbC1tYXAgW1Njcm9sbF9Mb2NrXSAgICAnc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2stbW9kZSkK IChkZWZpbmUta2V5IGdsb2JhbC1tYXAgW0MtUy1iYWNrc3BhY2VdICAna2lsbC13aG9sZS1saW5l KQogKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1hcCBbaG9tZV0JCSdtb3ZlLWJlZ2lubmluZy1vZi1saW5l KQogKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgZ2xvYmFsLW1hcCBbQy1ob21lXQkJJ2JlZ2lubmluZy1vZi1idWZmZXIp CmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9saXNwL3Njcm9sbC1sb2NrLmVsIGIvbGlzcC9zY3JvbGwtbG9jay5lbApp bmRleCAzYTc0YzExYjdhLi4zNmUyMjY0ZmU0IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9saXNwL3Njcm9sbC1sb2Nr LmVsCisrKyBiL2xpc3Avc2Nyb2xsLWxvY2suZWwKQEAgLTU0LDcgKzU0LDEwIEBAIHNjcm9sbC1s b2NrLW1vZGUKIFdoZW4gZW5hYmxlZCwga2V5cyB0aGF0IG5vcm1hbGx5IG1vdmUgcG9pbnQgYnkg bGluZSBvciBwYXJhZ3JhcGgKIHdpbGwgc2Nyb2xsIHRoZSBidWZmZXIgYnkgdGhlIHJlc3BlY3Rp dmUgYW1vdW50IG9mIGxpbmVzIGluc3RlYWQKIGFuZCBwb2ludCB3aWxsIGJlIGtlcHQgdmVydGlj YWxseSBmaXhlZCByZWxhdGl2ZSB0byB3aW5kb3cKLWJvdW5kYXJpZXMgZHVyaW5nIHNjcm9sbGlu Zy4iCitib3VuZGFyaWVzIGR1cmluZyBzY3JvbGxpbmcuCisKK05vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgZGVmYXVs dCBrZXkgYmluZGluZyB0byBTY3JvbGxfTG9jayB3aWxsIG5vdCB3b3JrIG9uCitNUy1XaW5kb3dz IHN5c3RlbXMgaWYgYHczMi1zY3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RpZmllcicgaXMgbm9uLW5pbC4iCiAgIDps aWdodGVyICIgU2NyTGNrIgogICA6a2V5bWFwIHNjcm9sbC1sb2NrLW1vZGUtbWFwCiAgIChpZiBz Y3JvbGwtbG9jay1tb2RlCi0tIAoyLjIwLjEKCg== --000000000000209caf05939cc070-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15702051606240 (code B ref 6861); Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2019 16:06:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iGQ5g-0001ca-Di for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 12:06:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com ([209.85.210.182]:46351) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iGQ5e-0001c9-1c for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 12:05:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id q5so4133700pfg.13 for <6861@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 09:05:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lGkXue7MwD7DhFQ3q8VXwDn8jW/5e0OgeoeJQDW/Ti8=; b=mOIn1+DngYOP2B5L8J0MYP2C7KMU5A6Kn062/VHn+Z+/5wcU2ZH9PwZ/oAVQI9H8jY jtguArn520mMZNOEMHmIzCLXicR9+1c8JfrAlkwKteMV8uuAgCg+GbcPKIkzcW1fmk4y mz+FFy0Ghdi24AA5LteNg0C8K0xOP81XvbFjjTv0BvI4e1bMtoiSam+0+6FWrNOvad6r hjN8TkmT//+N5vExsBXr9QXUvI/dNkx3ipSdiwyGPjj8wm4pbcnig9PQ437MRk+qi9Eo md49LwaxSDKkVP82HRmYZD9UJhutDTKnmaz2VhCp/02+K8EwokoB11rJjAqSAgGXr6CB S/bg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAULdxNMTQ6rMK1Grx2Xcn2VCnnqBgXxG/C711TzAVaxYaWu1jEJ h9e/VvQiStjZyarQXKDd2VPzWBhGFr6uf0SuZVg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzashAfme9H0rfizmJjLoJwujaS3SlMFZ6os9Sh7SpqOFGhjx+m/uBeYTFM/w/y+oTU/66fdPPHSsQ13Ug+Ihk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:8c4:: with SMTP id ds4mr3212751pjb.106.1570205151995; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> <83blwaeq7w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef03kkeu.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgoghb3b.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: From: Stefan Kangas Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:05:39 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) close 6861 27.1 quit > I'll push it in a couple of days if there are no further comments. Now pushed as commit 591c8bc70f. Best regards, Stefan Kangas