Subject: bug#68510: Bug in gnus' C-u S v

From: Tomas Volf <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 23:50:40 +0100

On 2024-01-19 14:29:37 -0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> >> 
> >> I suspect the prefix argument is being interpreted wrong somehow.
> 
> It ended up being pretty obvious what was wrong: the prefix argument is
> being used *both* to signal that the original message should be yanked,
> and in the usual process/prefix convention, which is resulting in broken
> behavior. It should only do one, but I don't know which one yet, so
> please just don't use "S v" with a prefix argument -- if you need the
> original yanked, use "S V".

Will do.  Thank you for the investigation and for the advice.

Have a nice day,
Tomas Volf

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.