GNU bug report logs -
#68487
[PATCH] Make jump commands usable for all skeletons
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Any progress there?
> From: martin <law <at> martinmarshall.com>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 68487 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:05:04 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Ping! Martin, can you please respond to Stefan's comments, so we
> > could move forward with this issue?
>
> Sorry for the long delay in responding. I'll try to get to this by the
> end of the weekend.
>
>
> >> Cc: 68487 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 23:07:18 -0500
> >> From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >>
> >> >> Ideally this should go along with the removal of the use of a vector in
> >> >> `expand-list`, which not only is odd given its name but is odd because
> >> >> it seems completely useless.
> >> >
> >> > Nothing (at least nothing in Emacs core) stores a vector to
> >> > `expand-list`. So I'm curious why `expand-abbrev-hook` was written to
> >> > account for that possibility.
> >>
> >> It's because it internally did that, tho I don't know why it did that
> >> internally since my patch seems to show that it's simpler not to.
> >>
> >> > Changing `expand-abbrev-hook` to expect `expand-list` to actually be a
> >> > list (as you did with your patch) makes sense to me.
> >>
> >> Should I install it, so it's kept separate from the changes you add
> >> on top (mostly for readability of the patches)?
> >>
> >> > What do you think?
> >>
> >> I find the patch a bit hard to read, maybe for lack of a separate
> >> description of the intended changes, or maybe because it does too much
> >> in a single step.
> >>
> >> I have one question, tho:
> >>
> >> > (defun expand-do-expansion ()
> >> > - (delete-char (- (length last-abbrev-text)))
> >> > - (let* ((vect (symbol-value last-abbrev))
> >> > - (text (aref vect 0))
> >> > - (position (aref vect 1))
> >> > - (jump-args (aref vect 2))
> >> > - (hook (aref vect 3)))
> >> > - (cond (text
> >> > - (insert text)
> >> > - (setq expand-point (point))))
> >> > - (if jump-args
> >> > - (funcall #'expand-build-list (car jump-args) (cdr jump-args)))
> >> > - (if position
> >> > - (backward-char position))
> >> > - (if hook
> >> > - (funcall hook))
> >> > - t))
> >> > -
> >> > -(defun expand-abbrev-from-expand (word)
> >> > - "Test if an abbrev has a hook."
> >> > - (or
> >> > - (and (intern-soft word local-abbrev-table)
> >> > - (symbol-function (intern-soft word local-abbrev-table)))
> >> > - (and (intern-soft word global-abbrev-table)
> >> > - (symbol-function (intern-soft word global-abbrev-table)))))
> >> > -
> >> > -(defun expand-previous-word ()
> >> > - "Return the previous word."
> >> > - (save-excursion
> >> > - (let ((p (point)))
> >> > - (backward-word 1)
> >> > - (buffer-substring p (point)))))
> >> > + ;; expand-point tells us if we have inserted the text
> >> > + ;; ourself or if it is the hook which has done the job.
> >> > + (if (listp expand-list)
> >> > + (setq expand-index 0
> >> > + expand-pos (expand-list-to-markers expand-list)
> >> > + expand-list nil))
> >> > + (run-hooks 'expand-expand-hook))
> >>
> >> Hmm... but this `expand-do-expansion` doesn't actually "do" any
> >> expansion any more, right?
> >>
> >> > (defun expand-skeleton-end-hook ()
> >> > - (if skeleton-positions
> >> > - (setq expand-list skeleton-positions)))
> >> > + (when skeleton-positions
> >> > + (setq expand-list skeleton-positions)
> >> > + (expand-do-expansion)))
> >>
> >> Here if you read the code out loud it doesn't make sense to call
> >> `expand-do-expansion` since skeleton has already "done the expansion".
> >>
> >>
> >> Stefan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Martin Marshall
>
This bug report was last modified 95 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.