GNU bug report logs -
#68487
[PATCH] Make jump commands usable for all skeletons
Previous Next
Full log
Message #17 received at 68487 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> OK. But after applying the patch on the master branch, I get this
> while byte-compiling:
>
> In toplevel form:
> expand.el:91:2: Error: Eager macro-expansion failure: (error "Eager macro-expansion skipped due to cycle:
> => (load \"expand.el\") => (macroexpand-all (define-skeleton expand-c-for-skeleton )) => (macroexpand (define-skeleton )) => (load \"skeleton.el\") => (load \"expand.el\")")
>
> In toplevel form:
> skeleton.el:34:11: Error: Eager macro-expansion failure: (error "Eager macro-expansion skipped due to cycle:
> => (load \"expand.el\") => (macroexpand-all (define-skeleton expand-c-for-skeleton )) => (macroexpand (define-skeleton )) => (load \"skeleton.el\") => (load \"expand.el\")")
> Makefile:335: recipe for target `skeleton.elc' failed
> make[3]: *** [skeleton.elc] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> Makefile:335: recipe for target `expand.elc' failed
>
> Could you please DTRT to avoid these errors?
Sorry, that was due to my incorrect assumption that byte-compiling with
"C-c C-f" would be equivalent to a full recompile.
I can fix it by deleting the sample skeleton (`expand-c-for-skeleton')
from expand.el. But even though it's just a sample template, there
might be people using it.
Another option would be to join expand.el and skeleton.el into a single
file, perhaps calling it "expand-skeleton.el".
What do you think is best?
--
Best regards,
Martin Marshall
This bug report was last modified 95 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.