GNU bug report logs - #68286
ovmf does not contain secureboot firmware

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>

Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 13:46:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: 68286 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#68286: ovmf does not contain secureboot firmware
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:45:17 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

looking at the ovmf package, is seems that it does not contain files required
for secureboot.  When I compare what Archlinux ships:

    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_CODE.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_CODE.csm.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_CODE.csm.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_CODE.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_CODE.secboot.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_VARS.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/ia32/OVMF_VARS.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/
    usr/share/edk2/x64/MICROVM.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/MICROVM.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_CODE.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_CODE.csm.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_CODE.csm.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_CODE.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_CODE.secboot.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_VARS.4m.fd
    usr/share/edk2/x64/OVMF_VARS.fd

with what we do:

    /gnu/store/nqv29p1kz1lwc6g3rifyi5mrapcx97wf-ovmf-202308/share/firmware/ovmf_code_ia32.bin
    /gnu/store/nqv29p1kz1lwc6g3rifyi5mrapcx97wf-ovmf-202308/share/firmware/ovmf_code_x64.bin
    /gnu/store/nqv29p1kz1lwc6g3rifyi5mrapcx97wf-ovmf-202308/share/firmware/ovmf_ia32.bin
    /gnu/store/nqv29p1kz1lwc6g3rifyi5mrapcx97wf-ovmf-202308/share/firmware/ovmf_vars_ia32.bin
    /gnu/store/nqv29p1kz1lwc6g3rifyi5mrapcx97wf-ovmf-202308/share/firmware/ovmf_vars_x64.bin
    /gnu/store/nqv29p1kz1lwc6g3rifyi5mrapcx97wf-ovmf-202308/share/firmware/ovmf_x64.bin

There seem to be some files missing.  The secboot would be useful, but the csm
might be as well.

I tried to make a patch to build multiple firmwares, however due to how other
packages inherit from it, it was quite messy.  I wonder if having just a single
ovmf package would simplify things. The size bloat from merging them
seems... negligible.  At least for the QEMU use case.

Have a nice day,
Tomas Volf

--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 161 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.