From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 04 23:23:50 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2024 04:23:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbkM-0008F3-An for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:50 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:60234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbkJ-0008Eq-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbk9-0001vN-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:37 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbk9-0005iL-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:Subject:To:From:mime-version:in-reply-to: references; bh=d65aVN1Xs8k5M2X+SH/3QT+4k9q8L2HRWnhAjpO/dgc=; b=nQ8T4Eyff3bxGl VdsSOfXDV7EwSxjkYZtIx+WS2TTI3oJUP/J63uv9J0zWz4BlMLe0l0+tUok8STTaVAmIzhyKwZm1z bydTgK1uPWZkRvtjIE9QcQge8tkkv4a4mLs5VkavHXNAfakuVpruL0OuNb/MKjAs3wOD85BBqHfSJ ZMS8lHMyz20+IjHqwwWAGk5qUb9Frbu1O9AywxFucfvFYuagbpeVgROQYd8cQrHvPecGj0ncPN2Bc HKBJJabA3/E5qhfsvPz6/gg2nv2swnDRzUXShMWo+9EdQYjzFju7pkdapUjDcatirb3gjDDMPPSsQ 9XH7eK3Sxyw12fOujbiQ==; Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbk9-0000Ak-CU; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:37 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower X-Debbugs-Cc: Message-Id: Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:37 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) In master from Jan 1, making Rmail summaries has become far slower than it was on July 2. I am calling rmail-summary-by-topic and have around 7000 messages in the RMAIL file. It takes many secnds to finish, now. Can anyone suggest a way to investigate the cause of the slowdown? In GNU Emacs 30.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.32, cairo version 1.16.0) of 2024-01-02 built on freetop Repository revision: 1c369263db826a02e01d4209c7b6b8617971c37c Repository branch: master System Description: Trisquel GNU/Linux Nabia (10.0) Configured using: 'configure 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g' --with-gnutls=ifavailable' Configured features: CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GPM GSETTINGS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LIBOTF LIBSELINUX LIBXML2 M17N_FLT MODULES NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS X11 XDBE XIM XINPUT2 XPM GTK2 ZLIB Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Help Minor modes in effect: gpm-mouse-mode: t tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t isearch-fold-quotes-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t minibuffer-regexp-mode: t buffer-read-only: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t auto-composition-mode: linux auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t abbrev-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow emacsbug shortdoc comp-common rmail-spam-filter rmailedit rmailsort undigest kmacro cl-extra parse-time iso8601 vc-cvs vc-rcs log-view easy-mmode pcvs-util mhtml-mode css-mode eww xdg url-queue mm-url gnus nnheader range wid-edit color js c-ts-common cc-mode cc-fonts cc-guess cc-menus cc-cmds cc-styles cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs sgml-mode facemenu format-spec battery dbus diff help-fns radix-tree mule-util display-line-numbers grep compile etags fileloop generator xref quail epa-mail sh-script rx smie treesit executable shell pcomplete comint ansi-osc ring tabify imenu man ansi-color rect thingatpt help-mode novice project misearch multi-isearch ispell textsec uni-scripts idna-mapping ucs-normalize uni-confusable textsec-check shr pixel-fill kinsoku url-file svg xml dom dabbrev mailalias rmailout rmailkwd qp rmailmm message sendmail yank-media puny rfc822 mml mml-sec epa epg epg-config gnus-util text-property-search time-date mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader mail-parse rfc2231 files-x dired-aux dired dired-loaddefs t-mouse term/linux view derived disp-table advice rmailsum rmail rfc6068 rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils finder-inf osm-autoloads info compat-autoloads package browse-url url url-proxy url-privacy url-expand url-methods url-history url-cookie generate-lisp-file url-domsuf url-util mailcap url-handlers url-parse auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core cl-macs password-cache json subr-x map byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile url-vars cl-loaddefs cl-lib rmc iso-transl tooltip cconv eldoc paren electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type elisp-mode mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd touch-screen tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer nadvice seq simple cl-generic indonesian philippine cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite emoji-zwj charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help abbrev obarray oclosure cl-preloaded button loaddefs theme-loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget keymap hashtable-print-readable backquote threads dbusbind inotify dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting cairo gtk x-toolkit xinput2 x multi-tty move-toolbar make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 533533 109378) (symbols 48 18701 4) (strings 32 94791 7168) (string-bytes 1 3149144) (vectors 16 70370) (vector-slots 8 1635953 197499) (floats 8 246 373) (intervals 56 43446 492) (buffers 976 64)) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 05 03:55:59 2024 Received: (at 68249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2024 08:55:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLfzi-0003eY-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 03:55:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLfzd-0003eI-UC for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 03:55:57 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLfzS-00088w-7w for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 03:55:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=1+4SbwlRcckHhxuUW1z2g4u5dewPr0BXRuOcRb0Gi0o=; b=Ai9tBgnN8bpY vjJ5k8C0WEiiZkR/hRnnM0nYdxe8kxfU35OUTrGRnlLU6QDzizLCaIboWb8Q5ZhgUyoTMDkeEkg1X LyTJxurnQw/Omdz8ZzPF1bWARgc3X2HFTeQOaC5vNguqW39Hh89qNLoWmNO8VHgaqVEuAaGk2Z/Sl 3AnOjrqPQaO+2KR2ymgYf/UOJlQILxadYGaviEAwkFKgSTIDuhV1voBC6Qt7G8PwgIxjbZdlZZ4kn G0OayNJ1znlhBcsNbgYhlPDt/knEgAGORvENJZ7kjuM96W6FA6UsyZxLHVxWLX51An1S4Ikbaokvk kCQeXeo5O+mmPjBjXQ1i8Q==; Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 10:55:23 +0200 Message-Id: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:37 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#68249: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68249 Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:37 -0500 > > > In master from Jan 1, making Rmail summaries has become far > slower than it was on July 2. I am calling rmail-summary-by-topic > and have around 7000 messages in the RMAIL file. It takes many secnds > to finish, now. > > Can anyone suggest a way to investigate the cause of the slowdown? Before invoking rmail-summary-by-topic, type M-x profiler-start RET RET Then, after rmail-summary-by-topic finishes, type M-x profiler-report RET In the buffer presented by the last command, type "C-u RET" on every line that has a "+" before it, to fully expand the profile. Then look at the profile to find the hot spots. The profile is more detailed if you load rmailsum.el, not rmailsum.elc. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 06 23:31:59 2024 Received: (at 68249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2024 04:31:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMKpL-0004yA-Bj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46060) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMKpJ-0004xv-BA for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:57 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMKp8-0006bV-NV for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=j2Ipo4icQp7XQMTZlQzhzPWHP/ikky0a3SFhIl3s48g=; b=nQHjijMSB3sk +eUHJ16KTxjJfgV2GkjK/j3WqXLtEOvcxakJBM6XdMa8rZ+2kP6puXrkBMtVIKtDDKIKUgtWhIac2 ZVxlmcrRYwD4HrV097IX4u09KtC9Pm6bCyNyY1l2H+ZMWweuyV8Qkga+W+AbJNeFDHtIy3AbrOQMm w1A+bgZhcuYuBo1X3Jcbkr4+4vzNDR4/sicQvHpzaf6beApic7d/qWMrHF0cuVyOc8GMnIBT7Ovh6 pWsPOqyA7hgfdMWSv9LxgC7eoUYiea4bTxbPWPOzWCB5EdXQomtLBXXZltIrZXxiIOOdJ+vV+pb4M AA9oO9m6Qmn5paZZ8Z+mAQ==; Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMKp7-0003MD-1C; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:45 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 05 Jan 2024 10:55:23 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#68249: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower References: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:45 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68249 Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] Thanks. Here's what I got: 1573 54% + command-execute 1098 38% Automatic GC 159 5% + timer-event-handler 25 0% + ... 19 0% redisplay_internal (C function) 8 0% + rmail-summary-rmail-update I am not sure what that implies, since nothing in a loop to check messages appears in it. Should I try this in the previous version for comparison? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 07 02:27:47 2024 Received: (at 68249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2024 07:27:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMNZS-0004iV-Op for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 02:27:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMNZQ-0004iI-ST for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 02:27:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMNZG-00059V-0M for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 02:27:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=2zqaCHCWQSqncbTWQsoqfsJmOUaXCx6oBBDC1pw1ItQ=; b=nw3Q35rLXYdr 1sGry9MBhj5+DL1O/5U0y9IPHOHkwksP6fCKitmz5XdzYNVEbkRK+CxeAb+ijYoulaeRMDmEiMEpG 59LnOIzE4ENTqevehO7bhHl50qHKrhh4+h4yz5PrrCO1JfdM3pYpcHI97of+1xBF06QNqaYeLu9o6 KiVBHZi7zbyRbYPA6LyjBM4sRKOrwhtMGatosPWxvT+Ao0bbjdx+cvizZxZ96oQwjPk8e0a/IoXwl TjaKTOm22/pPZIML1rdc4zrHtJuEhrX9VbUUKQZ3hOKYRqBHR+ySF+tNYY72USFRAPBIGbnmZEDer bMXLJ72IH0/tg2cxSzQ8ow==; Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 09:27:21 +0200 Message-Id: <835y05siw6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:45 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#68249: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower References: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68249 Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:45 -0500 > > 1573 54% + command-execute > 1098 38% Automatic GC > 159 5% + timer-event-handler > 25 0% + ... > 19 0% redisplay_internal (C function) > 8 0% + rmail-summary-rmail-update > > I am not sure what that implies, since nothing in a loop > to check messages appears in it. You didn't expand the profile. All those lines which have a "+" before the function's name are "folded", and you can "unfold" them by going to the line and pressing RET. "C-u RET" will unfold _all_ such folded lines, and you will see the detailed profile of command-execute, which I think where the problem happens, and where you will find the loop that checks messages (or a function that runs such a loop). > Should I try this in the previous version for comparison? That could help, yes. But before that, I think a fully expanded ("unfolded") profile of the current version is needed. It is also strange that GC takes such a large proportion of time. It is possible that the slowdown is because some subroutine makes much more garbage than the previous implementation did. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 23 23:16:26 2024 Received: (at 68249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2024 04:16:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44287 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSUgc-0005zB-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:16:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSUga-0005yv-4P for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:16:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSUgP-0003EB-Kl for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:16:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=6Q4MtnaRHq/FnyMuOHlQ+hKUOXJ4bBpLUsT0jabjdV4=; b=phDmz2Q37sof 2tboQRXdPzZ0an0dxFqboqi4ewGnCQx3GVkngYFjV3JFjNCjxy0ncEXi3JZPtthEGHa6MftZfouSE hCCwYMSNK3zetG4RIn7nSZB8YpsgrXcnBLdnvZ/++z1cO4b3vjV5OpW3vUQgwXGEVNHR9lRHMulBo nNMkZqBMp/Q1Kl5sAAwytlHOCuVmbY3hQp4e8lFGgF+fkYzMyk+Rmh07fQHRyfWqbkmUkf8YOsmzw 311WVPS0/lLxxE8L7Lkh+Nt/rHdIYfuaQIyjw1tcQDKEpM26h1MvyMDy6vzM/cmqZqHG92UQBqeGz 8j1EiaUs1d3Gtrd52Jx+fg==; Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSUgP-0007px-5U; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:16:13 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <835y05siw6.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 07 Jan 2024 09:27:21 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#68249: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower References: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> <835y05siw6.fsf@gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:16:13 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68249 Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > From: Richard Stallman > > Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:31:45 -0500 > > > > 1573 54% + command-execute > > 1098 38% Automatic GC > > 159 5% + timer-event-handler > > 25 0% + ... > > 19 0% redisplay_internal (C function) > > 8 0% + rmail-summary-rmail-update > > > > I am not sure what that implies, since nothing in a loop > > to check messages appears in it. > You didn't expand the profile. All those lines which have a "+" > before the function's name are "folded", and you can "unfold" them by > going to the line and pressing RET. "C-u RET" will unfold _all_ such > folded lines, and you will see the detailed profile of > command-execute, which I think where the problem happens, and where > you will find the loop that checks messages (or a function that runs Thank you. I just saw this message today. I found the cause of the problem a few days later, and fixed it. I will note this down for later. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 24 05:03:36 2024 Received: (at 68249-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2024 10:03:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSa6a-0004C4-66 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:03:36 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::529]:54629) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSa6X-0004Bq-S5 for 68249-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:03:34 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55a44bb66d3so6051315a12.1 for <68249-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:03:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706090602; x=1706695402; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hBsjjGK1FdR91aEGP3qH1QAfII7gvqrBKSdv16y9L/I=; b=grBOrJPPk764eg1IycBMANhJ8M0D4Okr1MIGkLa9/dCTvu2mSlpD07A1UV98MeJ/wq TUk5TJYNCPcUJZa3czea2+i6FKVH5XpO5F2cy8jSeiDEiRNyKEBO+qfl02i5JPfy+r5l fmB7plwA5C7qw/9DyDkogaWgmGg8xLkymiPXqreFbb4eDfzCTWI5DTIhq9/SrjWi3IoK rgZrgoShV3yX98TLKur4cbmeHtz9afXgLzSVV4tN0gSnVXws0RFKUWjrAbadoi7b0IiF pCvGmkWvPiE/YNc3mE9Xhwk2wTBct9+VuueaUWO9Ku+xMcNMlUzPBgvwQMvT9LqJgk/L sM6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706090602; x=1706695402; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hBsjjGK1FdR91aEGP3qH1QAfII7gvqrBKSdv16y9L/I=; b=dEWHSquCw+UHrYo7upcoa3CZs4WTWmTo1rW2nP+l1CBxZdthsckfLc4csJ9OdIJ40N RcZYKihROWIgAg+ecNROtDIrINDi5KIMsSQd5YPSxcWWYymG/O/TFQ9L8ykGuSZ120DT qb7ZsHyNoUbPQt5nC/ONFjcdlQhHttymrbp/YbcE3y/t1znCkauKf72lOpksz67JoIJ7 j/HD+y3kikAzP37AmxU+XNjgyEMYnWzx/lgL+u/w6rMUbxzpJ38jA17Bw52wMMPrxHp5 IJrTz0KQscS6WAw2z1rBheN1pvA1ylLKrOldFEVSwd0Pag8I9kf5FJY/jnXaHs7L6MMA Umlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZAWWQb3Bbj3Gw38bfAjGiwP1XJrp3RqppA5LAeeXDOIINyJ9K 55as/Wf0zFt1w8tiUqHy/X6vs3/Wn2GrPnAtjIMvRd/J+AnQnPUStR6MBuHOIR81m+n8hd2js9u /4/lbLE/q9uEgB+uXUDdaYguw89M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlUqvIyM530ucaEg0LUxgv8VORU8l2TCUQRvyj6ocwN+P3ZF1nwuMJqA5aHnRtyFo9+1CKsdkk0SW5PgvN0Sw= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c2ce:0:b0:55c:d475:a93 with SMTP id m14-20020aa7c2ce000000b0055cd4750a93mr126819edp.77.1706090602267; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:03:21 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: References: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> <835y05siw6.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:03:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#68249: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower To: rms@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68249-done Cc: 68249-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Richard Stallman writes: > I found the cause of the problem a few days later, and fixed it. I'm therefore closing this bug report. Let me know if that's wrong, and I'll reopen it. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 24 07:31:27 2024 Received: (at 68249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2024 12:31:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rScPf-00031P-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:31:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rScPe-00031C-82 for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:31:26 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rScPT-0005KA-NZ for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:31:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=EF+nFSdpseL0eVw9Ltimz22WhTZfEMl5SsMJtUaz0Nc=; b=q13eybEgIKac jwlAYK+TIuzJqkYGk+rEneIkN3nlfD9aEXxF3u5AVcND69hr0GlazgVEBYN3RCMHW9BtBNXvc6JOH AtdL6C5D0cd0kpfn8w1yjETJir9Eu45ECQHq7M7yMKdv1TGHTEk/XKWEi+9vigNZK65l8SGrNt9XR SOpWl62pcDzeZI1dvJ4VbLEmdd5sMfLKoj2kt66cylYYcYTgLzDIwRNVBkds8DDuzskb/xG6XE6Jf NLcYbEwhY8JYvf6yDDa/jDgXCkz2szDRzgSdoxAJBZWDER59gkMSfKUhXu1bijqKa5JI7CkCCcZjd vuVCG7KBNsxtYetxABAekw==; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:30:43 +0200 Message-Id: <8634um6hho.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:16:13 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#68249: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower References: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> <835y05siw6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68249 Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:16:13 -0500 > > I found the cause of the problem a few days later, and fixed it. You mean, you found a problem that was not a bug in Emacs? Or was the problem in Emacs, but it was fixed by your change from 3 weeks ago in rmail-epa-decrypt-1? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 26 22:36:58 2024 Received: (at 68249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2024 03:36:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTZV3-0004ju-Jb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:36:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTZV0-0004jh-QQ for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:36:55 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTZUo-0004qE-IG for 68249@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:36:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=6NRYQ+8PcCrx8VKhQfpACSV0svGU1FS+R/0a+VFmGR0=; b=LaMVmdZ1ih7J q9BL4u7ZtoLpmiTu4QcJbVxAvgCm16rZ+/FSiXY2RBQF81eO47DGNfv95cwsK6YA+svTLx2elA0/2 M1VbQl42vyfVneNFZEt6XtBphgBKad0HpeciIXQAorDApTooz/RnC0OQ6XlgyO1Wrfmc+GpdhViUj NcB8G6yIN31Z1DIU8O3amMQoG1YOq0cuZD2BseAiQn3fAJ7PgnJiRpUXRm0gJTc/kGMF7n+4suEq3 8AxtMg25pQ2mzRku7G758pV9NROelPS+GxW+mCaAbucoUn8Rl85bTc0asjCCSgOXTjHXco7zbVy2S WJ0eIoMd3T/phPApIYHVMw==; Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTZUo-0007em-2Z; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:36:42 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <8634um6hho.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:30:43 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#68249: 30.0.50; Rmail summaries much slower References: <8334vcw45g.fsf@gnu.org> <835y05siw6.fsf@gnu.org> <8634um6hho.fsf@gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:36:42 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68249 Cc: 68249@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > You mean, you found a problem that was not a bug in Emacs? Or was the > problem in Emacs, but it was fixed by your change from 3 weeks ago in > rmail-epa-decrypt-1? I was using that patch privately, but forgot to copy it into the newer sources. After I copied it in, the slowness went away. I decided it was time to install that patch. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:44:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator