GNU bug report logs - #68246
30.0.50; Add non-TS mode as extra parent of TS modes

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:12:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 68246 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, casouri <at> gmail.com, joaotavora <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#68246: 30.0.50; Add non-TS mode as extra parent of TS modes
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 14:45:39 +0200
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  casouri <at> gmail.com,  68246 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 23:11:00 -0500
> 
> >    (set-language-for-mode 'foo-ts-mode 'foo)
> 
> Maybe we want to introduce this concept, indeed.
> 
> maybe we want to that notion of "language" from elsewhere, such as
> the one used in LSP?

Please don't call it "language".  That'd be confusing.  LSP is about
programming languages, so "language" is natural there.  But in Emacs,
a major mode is more general than that.  For example, it is not
unthinkable to consider mail-mode to be the extra-parent of
message-mode (or vice versa) -- but what is the "language" in that
case?

> Or maybe we want to take it from MIME types?
> I'm sure there are other options out there.
> 
> Problem is: they come with their own complexities and corner cases.
> After all, this is inevitable when you create a taxonomy.
> IOW, while we *may* want to add support for an explicit notion of "file
> type", it's a whole problem in itself and it will not solve all
> our problems either.

File types also have problems: Emacs modes are sometimes defined for
buffers that don't visit files.

> In the mean time, I think `derived-mode-add-parents` is worth a try.
> As mentioned in some message up-thread, I'm not 100% confident that it
> won't introduce serious breakage.  But I think we do need more
> experience and installing my patch is a good way to do that.

Yes, I think we should try it and see what we learn.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 104 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.