Subject: Re: bug#68246: 30.0.50; Add non-TS mode as extra parent of TS modes

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 19:15:46 +0200

> From: João Távora <[email-masked]>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:45:31 +0000
> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
> 
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:14 PM Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > > > It attempts to abstract a trait that isn't abstract, by going in the
> > > > opposite direction of that used for abstractions.
> > >
> > > It's interesting how you state a simple get/set is a "leaky abstraction",
> > > but then also not an abstraction at all.
> >
> > It's "leaky" because it "leaks" the idea that it should be a
> > "language".
> 
> Oh right, of course.  Who came with this "leaky" idea that there
> are programming languages are all?

For some reason, once any discussion with you got past some number of
messages, it always deteriorates into a stream of ad-hominem and
sarcastic nonsense.  I'm outta here.