GNU bug report logs -
#68244
hash-table improvements
Previous Next
Full log
Message #26 received at 68244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> But let's try anyway: here is a run of one of the main suites I've been
> using. The numbers indicate relative changes in percent of elapsed time from
> the baseline to the tip of the scratch/hash-table-perf branch, negative
> numbers being better. For example, -50 means that speed has doubled, +100
> that it has halved.
>
> [2. application/vnd.lotus-organizer; pct.org]
Lotus, eh?
> | | 681a2877cc2 |
> |---------------------------+-------------|
> | make empty | -88.9 |
> | make 4, dead | -88.8 |
> | make 16, dead | -62.3 |
> | make 64, dead | +25.1 |
> | make 256, dead | -77.7 |
> | make 1024, dead | -76.7 |
> | make 4096, dead | -81.4 |
> | make 100000, dead | -73.2 |
> |---------------------------+-------------|
> | make 4, alive | -93.3 |
> | make 16, alive | -75.6 |
> | make 64, alive | +11.5 |
> | make 256, alive | -82.4 |
> | make 1024, alive | -79.7 |
> | make 2048, alive | -83.3 |
> | make 4096, alive | -84.4 |
> | make 100000, alive | -75.1 |
What's up with 64?
Stefan
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 146 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.