GNU bug report logs - #68244
hash-table improvements

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:29:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Full log


Message #238 received at 68244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 68244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, dmitry <at> gutov.dev,
 stefankangas <at> gmail.com, acorallo <at> gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#68244: hash-table improvements
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:08:06 +0200
> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:53:06 +0100
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
>  acorallo <at> gnu.org,
>  gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com,
>  68244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
>  stefankangas <at> gmail.com
> 
> 24 feb. 2024 kl. 18.48 skrev Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>:
> 
> > Ah, sorry. I just looked at the output of describe-function.
> > 
> > obarray-make is not mentioned in NEWS.25, so its help currently says
> > 
> >  Probably introduced at or before Emacs version 30.1.
> 
> That's a good point, thank you. Would anyone object to my adding a terse notice to NEWS.25 about the obarray functions added in that release?

Instead of trying to change history, wouldn't it be better to ass some
mechanism for specifying the first release explicitly?  Or maybe we
already have it?




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 146 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.