Subject: Re: bug#68244: hash-table improvements

From: Mattias Engdegård <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 12:46:07 +0100

5 jan. 2024 kl. 18.14 skrev Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>:

>> [2. application/vnd.lotus-organizer; pct.org]
> 
> Lotus, eh?

For those having trouble reading the file, I may have some Organiser licenses left for sale.

> What's up with 64?

The old (current) hash tables have a default size of 65 which is very convenient if you happen to fill it with that many entries. The new code lowers the default substantially which is generally beneficial as most tables are small, and growing them is much cheaper than before.