Subject: bug#68244: hash-table improvements

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:45:22 +0200

> From: Mattias Engdegård <[email-masked]>
> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:02:08 +0100
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>,
>  [email-masked]
> 
> 4 jan. 2024 kl. 17.39 skrev Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>:
> 
> > Any data about the actual performance gains?
> 
> Lots, naturally, but hash tables have many moving parts and performance is many-dimensional which is why I didn't include the raw data; it's voluminous and not always easy to interpret. Giving a single number as in 'now 20 % faster' is impossible if we want to stay honest, because there are so many different aspects, contexts and operations.

It doesn't have to be a single number.  Showing a series of separate
benchmarks is also fine.