From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 03 11:30:13 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2024 16:30:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53100 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rL48B-0006zO-3p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:30:12 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:41544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rL484-0006T1-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:30:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rL47v-0006lG-V9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:29:56 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rL47u-0000If-7O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:29:55 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-67f7da00237so55541906d6.2 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:29:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704299392; x=1704904192; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iaNqpGkZOzwx0kvy5xTsydIEVgRBl9KaUGe3CT9qj2I=; b=JFymGsV7g2t7SjYRDYlJiXMXJ9ZX0pnCdn61TqQ/pSV8EmbpzOgIuNNnyyduqYzY1N epR/fmpkAq6tcDnsaU7HWlYwZew6BRdsRrDHqMcqJeWwRDKeQN7Ltq6gTbqdj9sgL0Tn NcVhxetpZrOQs6mm8zBu9LfwyuzwFXghEGJXFVH42siqUDgKm5FFSXM5cv01lNT3WCtn 17Zcz72EpUMmY1APdQzsf7xma/r+rnPd5y+V9uNYvwlBAGIJHZXJFUn2M1p5aQJ62dpB 5x7oApj4m67XtlCWy+rbvEYQx1dHhkzKr3YWSQmlN7wBWigcmRtBQDRHTJuFgwk3LUO4 lbTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704299392; x=1704904192; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iaNqpGkZOzwx0kvy5xTsydIEVgRBl9KaUGe3CT9qj2I=; b=wdYhNYKMi2IrivrG5n20PlqrF4XjE85Fq+gE2InaaLJy33mSM+DfA2W2FfC5nPG8xX DfAFUXvKcVnaUhUS++jMX4axO3CkiF6Fppd8DlBNrjjvUYBemPfSlBpAQR3v2LLwK5UL Tp+mnZy7go4xoQkv+ZnRffiwcHXkNhKHjL/kSxU3RRxkMqVPnQizu4VK6tPv/6hTzNwe JECun5zZk09Vx3n/B4BQ6yWdJFK+5oPHnJtK8O6H3TldtoddFaly30PnQ+RtbMrJJG2W 2+7pQRLFYAUYJ6pHJ3HoW722LfC/f2gK+sQyuAyrjRFzFpjbPNXrS5YVzLwFa7R7Ix9+ duHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywg40vcebLs9oHzwZm7rIuOUJrrHDbwgHZfKYBdBl3+FI5tYy6C 8+cZiGuBrUv1aLw8XDssMpx4bds2pI8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFHSWxNVpbO0utR1Obxs/PQ7QVDCd6XV3x1sXNTpfSJYoVMYHRtqBbxsnEDc3dbmTw2oFXu/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20c8:b0:67f:8922:5acc with SMTP id 8-20020a05621420c800b0067f89225accmr23427238qve.41.1704299392048; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:29:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-132-1.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.132.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j13-20020a0cf30d000000b0067f49337d45sm11031911qvl.98.2024.01.03.08.29.51 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:29:51 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: bug-guix Subject: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite In-Reply-To: <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> (cuirass@gnu.org's message of "Wed, 03 Jan 2024 14:06:51 +0000") References: <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> X-Debbugs-CC: Efraim Flashner Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:29:50 -0500 Message-ID: <87frze7535.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf32.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >

The build go.powerpc64le-linux for specification master is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here.

> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details The test failure is: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) script_test.go:193: # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) > go build -o complex.exe complex > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex [stderr] # complex gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' [exit status 2] FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure FAIL FAIL cmd/go 46.068s --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. -- Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 03 11:53:32 2024 Received: (at 68229-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2024 16:53:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53122 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rL4Ul-0003nv-TI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:53:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]:42466) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rL4Uh-0003nf-Fh for 68229-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:53:31 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-336c5b5c163so412447f8f.1 for <68229-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:53:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704300798; x=1704905598; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dR7gX+bKtyfVXJEOYUqBUv15rSE5a0xbB0Gj8vo5HTE=; b=Xn90Nx28ajwWtpODUvpVxagaaHkgspoHqQc/IHmb2udShDpCYWrkOhfnWyEOlbJG2f GDhq4Lfy1+0gYP21AVcmirK2jCVgLrjpiusKNdT1Ggc7lQiAUIwOJiRz6yP84IsUfvy5 gXcMNsayHnrsnTd+6r4IzPABCbe5HdIM01Y6VXsexqbnjb8mHZ2nCV1EPFrryBBJc/pP ICAoGrILkjqmT502cOZm/9rQRzOafQiDdnq4WQrtodH4K4Aq94c5sPC7Foi6BYI5yPn5 XxN2sLJDwUcSlfeobr2KjDKF/cCkcc2aTKSeuHbr31AO322e5qsy+8YS2Axh95b4Xny4 dGPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704300798; x=1704905598; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dR7gX+bKtyfVXJEOYUqBUv15rSE5a0xbB0Gj8vo5HTE=; b=DaKXV+flMXBEKOZ7JnvtbTqZh9gkk1SrraJJUt2kjLnn8/aSNc6QRvxwRVUlmUcrp4 4IAHzC7T46T1/1t6f+hiubrIHBectHKioY9MguEH/fTvskD3hi5Nvu0A+3ZGPGFwIeE5 12rZC82tLaXzJtlTpQyIF9VYl9gvoAXB2VbGeqtyc67EFY8obJS/Ca1e3XBX6na8NTTY 5A5L2uutrph6jWqqIvuctAE8Wr4hlLykr5jR5JDM1InMQIVp55d4JBziEsAWWolS7LyL 0/HQfV/xzz50Y2DkodcFgRJ9rAP36GYE2Nb2dOnhHm/Lguj+aPtOHv0xK5NqJyfLv5YO Y3iQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyVeVPLJmOjH2qw700gesAhE/AGpX261MXk9wSmM/EzotfLaLTX aB1YChN2guQdD3BLXCuzKgkQiPtnQlSlKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGnRzg1KT6N3zQsvOmgDQYtzozP0a5w2Lls1qPkkbwQFqcMSlVd+oer1o6CQvTRkKM9ax7VSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5645:0:b0:336:c79d:7504 with SMTP id j5-20020a5d5645000000b00336c79d7504mr569619wrw.2.1704300798233; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:53:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([141.226.15.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18-20020adff0d2000000b003365aa39d30sm30914478wro.11.2024.01.03.08.53.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:53:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:53:15 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Maxim Cournoyer , 68229-done@debbugs.gnu.org References: <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> <87frze7535.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ktFXk3aD3JVPkg3h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87frze7535.fsf@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68229-done Cc: 68229-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --ktFXk3aD3JVPkg3h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello, >=20 > cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >=20 > >

The build go.powerpc64le-linux for specification master is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build > href=3D"https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here.

> > > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details >=20 > The test failure is: >=20 > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) > --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) > script_test.go:193:=20 > # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) > > go build -o complex.exe complex > > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=3Dgccgo -o complex.exe comp= lex > [stderr] > # complex > gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=3D/gnu= /store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' > [exit status 2] > FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected comman= d failure > =20 > FAIL > FAIL cmd/go 46.068s > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >=20 > I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching > gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --ktFXk3aD3JVPkg3h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmWVkPsACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1FQiRAAgahms27hfYaIrd51rQh28hjI0sQijYzYEICUFzZOVEKKg73gOwir+WwE xrWd6FeBu/s6H8vBN3yT1egVc0QEkAPoGzEFMOevMZeJMxl3XbqEMC+Va3Y3Z3jw L7zT3xB/ik2TtWYZUUGYCXwrd+IkMTCUKGr2WGL/gjXP9GI+6AyYe58/S7yGkKXb 4rm7tAFeuij5lYx9rYiDtCa1dD3QLXbNEjCet73rNBx6u9rJQ7Ztytdve8gyvbGX UukCoMVA/T0s9O0/Hy4EiKZWBFZ0K8zv3Ao4+eg8ryRw5HZJQ7ekC3AfrEs62cFF Rwm/m2hXT+ZbwsDMIQgU3rnpqxk9IABY4XpXJWguzr+ynkGB+iXUEo1UiB7RIy1Z rIbWVmZTgJzfdbAS7YuRcgIGPD69eKXDYXWulr+wtPLqHrtH9UHmJsPlyubJ7kqz MnJBkNoBhPVplenFQCYffO2zTjcqFED75OJxUlvXq8QQhegK7E6oau+IgCueyP0H 1zs1yznm09nKe6PPx47874hQZE+S++U4NJO8c7Aue0HopaHcNBIaO2joRKSHcxj7 ATnO5OizxmMAAHiMLdNX9KgUlcrlvrDqTKNfZYxr0w87fIIySdcXpoFew1YKBdVW +nKLaQb72HwHgDRVnSVZ45TOMz6LguAWvQ+NBSr8tCdp7RRNLhI= =kkao -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ktFXk3aD3JVPkg3h-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 03 12:59:38 2024 Received: (at 68229) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2024 17:59:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rL5Wj-0007Pv-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 12:59:38 -0500 Received: from mail-oa1-x31.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::31]:59861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rL5We-0007PW-SN for 68229@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 12:59:35 -0500 Received: by mail-oa1-x31.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-204ec50010eso3132682fac.3 for <68229@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:59:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704304764; x=1704909564; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mSVQhZ/M4Glia0a6iQ8Q6penMgrsjLuf/N/qMhLEZh4=; b=heAzt5NoyH6ZNEhsVYmipnpg0wD7pDKnsHbvGsNU0BE5LPppzbpAZoqjRXoBwbSvjW YN6iuTiW64ySnaqo52PAhLSgztssRD9B3yaqglnp03ZeFdMd0rp3NTjFO8cZihGnBFvo 617gKNPFYK9gxm64SDcxuQaDk3r5WQdGRhDaK+DKMcEgtR+uEwcKd9YiQAyprOPnJNIx o2rUESMPuwj59vs0+Wf00preCBT5MaIVT/dvwylnrw6rBLYjEMS/SOHtcIhmGJBdC5hp 5Rm0bmmpdwa6pXE6ZXt4ierXMWPv+NFvS9LwiwaZUSsMmOmG63lNq0srlBoIGnLXqKi6 pXiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704304764; x=1704909564; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mSVQhZ/M4Glia0a6iQ8Q6penMgrsjLuf/N/qMhLEZh4=; b=xPlcoaOF9bnEPXkoYxkd0MxvuCsVsBBZmvZP5/nFPBncflSafUsqo/qY1NOwJ0V/2l 1BySD8P/PTNO/06Xiz/SzPoiQ0wUUdNAVtTijZJ6qNQvnkxRaKnW8rgiVQfCjhL4tIP+ mxtV6nVh/j4+TnuqdUIMAQeEOog+hbe2HNgMXQDhZDpQsPa0CNboy937Rmhbug+Cz6NE kdwjrSfL76Jn9WM1OiZdfrzuLhMmVsZ9mX2WdKCx8+TxTNCJJPnHfQJQUwBrYpsgdpXP WQ962aHDRSZWPGIBTSAvaPuR+KjkJZ16IhQ984Agns/3QvzdeEhbvGRCsmBRZEHIYSBk 1kzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSTM3vnyGfPqSuCMkKTQB5YJIY4AbTcxPCaVxKcDFzkXf5OtQV Ppv4GSaVGaW/hodE0WdL0zw36oAKOgU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFU5d4SzTukqinIQyM6C1wZ1VWjqo0IZe2fNHtcSMNU+Enw64mcA2GTSl8UoXGjSJ1/hC7yqA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:9727:b0:204:15da:4e93 with SMTP id n39-20020a056870972700b0020415da4e93mr18117806oaq.102.1704304763638; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:59:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-132-1.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.132.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c9-20020a05620a11a900b007815906f420sm6313275qkk.61.2024.01.03.09.59.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:59:23 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:53:15 +0200") References: <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> <87frze7535.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 12:59:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87le965mdh.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68229 Cc: 68229@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Efraim Flashner writes: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >> >> >

The build go.powerpc64le-linux for specification >> > master is broken. You can find the detailed information >> > about this build > > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here.

>> > >> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details >> >> The test failure is: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) >> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) >> script_test.go:193: >> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) >> > go build -o complex.exe complex >> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex >> [stderr] >> # complex >> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option >> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' >> [exit status 2] >> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure >> >> FAIL >> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching >> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. > > This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though, since it's an actual problem? -- Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 09 23:31:24 2024 Received: (at 68229) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2024 04:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNQFQ-0004sd-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:31:24 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]:58520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNQFO-0004mr-2q for 68229@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:31:23 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-67f9ace0006so15633286d6.0 for <68229@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 20:31:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704861069; x=1705465869; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:cc:references:in-reply-to :subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=20TvhVqq1d32Bl/JBXws+c1FhFvPfgCaHLfOgHF0Zho=; b=DQBIJ/EbDp62ZJEya49b+z3itIoMWp31M+e/yl5lIG7l7bZktGCWDuHc5UL384jSm6 aNphHRX+9l26gD0idQt4WplW4GJ+k+F679PFozsYktWNchZpcEzTr12tHKdFqqPsiyEi HhF+C61ja3F4GMr4WBJJiHSHQgv5X9KZia5FMNMvAjdzlBw0KCOA2+UPh5fk+3hfLZGd 1mHucIT8pzZP8l1fwCBE2kbyPikYT8Doi7h36YfDXexMP6Ike9yRrhCUUWhs1nFgfTRd nGVP+uFLiNXiqiK5+vNwqoDGJh2u7SiDR8JZt27r5hxxz73PIF3PZkrmeyYcFyR2jzCU 9yQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704861069; x=1705465869; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:cc:references:in-reply-to :subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=20TvhVqq1d32Bl/JBXws+c1FhFvPfgCaHLfOgHF0Zho=; b=Puvi5qx4ucqgUSQ3JfAS3/HabM2ZJ1p7NySY4yow8jk42+bmGflOjDtlW0obsOJruV YqrQOCqgNHmMeaFlEqYzldn8dLpfAW2NjzTB6dZEnlB/oVHjmQieekg64qRMiH6vqZMb 35x1UJkgQdGYVTtW+zXdW5QmDBRxNYfRXUuZICSs75z//IKTJZ1kjTlbRMdqoNfW4qi9 0pFFQ8iInGr7CSFyyPg2REiTxT4LFhb0P38IObdeAc8d0j9psgQRBZuGN12ARETxXRHX QMJeq+T/sSOZOYZupuHwsFcau5uozJgMqk52k/IQu6k/KpWJQaiMONjcHdvmo3sDgEyl aXpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz/kAi2+BW6aeIVe7JdrlZSGwLUv9Gqw9N3/3pdOrltTFTsTsqC VP8D/u2Pis5FXfDBK3qAxMltifWYBWxpJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFy9p3Qr3JIaMaX7BIIXol2ZGAfBSm+l7vKd+yPVk2gUCngwzRXExxFwssGDRtFANiUCS4H2A== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5bc9:0:b0:680:fb20:202f with SMTP id t9-20020ad45bc9000000b00680fb20202fmr561566qvt.127.1704861068852; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 20:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-205-151-56-231.b2b2c.ca. [205.151.56.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dg11-20020a056214084b00b0067f7e41de80sm1434693qvb.46.2024.01.09.20.31.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 20:31:08 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Wed, 03 Jan 2024 18:02:32 +0000") References: <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> <87frze7535.fsf@gmail.com> <87le965mdh.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:31:07 -0500 Message-ID: <875y01u7w4.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68229 Cc: 68229@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) reopen 68229 quit Hi, Efraim Flashner writes: > On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>Hello, >> >>Efraim Flashner writes: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >>>> >>>> >

The build go.powerpc64le-linux for specification >>>> > master is broken. You can find the detailed information >>>> > about this build >>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here.

>>>> > >>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details >>>> >>>> The test failure is: >>>> >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) >>>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) >>>> script_test.go:193: >>>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) >>>> > go build -o complex.exe complex >>>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex >>>> [stderr] >>>> # complex >>>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option >>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' >>>> [exit status 2] >>>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure >>>> >>>> FAIL >>>> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>>> >>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching >>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. >>> >>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. >> >>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though, >>since it's an actual problem? >> > Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing > depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not > supported otherwise. Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up. The task would be to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently inherits from it. Any takers? -- Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 10 00:30:27 2024 Received: (at 68229) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2024 05:30:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNRAZ-00078l-Fd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:30:27 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:42944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNRAX-0006tg-Nt for 68229@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:30:26 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [141.226.15.142]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBF6F40050; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 05:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 05:30:10 +0000 From: Efraim Flashner To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <875y01u7w4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> <87frze7535.fsf@gmail.com> <87le965mdh.fsf@gmail.com> <875y01u7w4.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68229 Cc: 68229@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On January 10, 2024 4:31:07 AM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >reopen 68229 >quit > >Hi, > >Efraim Flashner writes: > >> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>>Hello, >>> >>>Efraim Flashner writes: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>>=20 >>>>> cuirass@gnu=2Eorg (Cuirass) writes: >>>>>=20 >>>>> >

The build go=2Epowerpc64le-linux for specification >>>>> > master is broken=2E You can find the detailed information >>>>> > about this build >>>> > href=3D"https://ci=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg/build/3139760/details">here<= /a>=2E

>>>>> > >>>>> > https://ci=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg/build/3139760/details >>>>>=20 >>>>> The test failure is: >>>>>=20 >>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0=2E00s) >>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2=2E07s) >>>>> script_test=2Ego:193:=20 >>>>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1=2E990s) >>>>> > go build -o complex=2Eexe complex >>>>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=3Dgccgo -o complex=2Ee= xe complex >>>>> [stderr] >>>>> # complex >>>>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option >>>>> '-rpath=3D/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11=2E3=2E0= -lib/lib' >>>>> [exit status 2] >>>>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex=2Etxt:5: unexpected= command failure >>>>> =20 >>>>> FAIL >>>>> FAIL cmd/go 46=2E068s >>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>>>>=20 >>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching >>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be=2E >>>> >>>> This one is go-1=2E14=2E That one already failed for ppc64le=2E >>> >>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again=2E Should we leave the ticket open thou= gh, >>>since it's an actual problem? >>> >> Fine with me=2E We should probably remove go-1=2E14 anyway if nothing >> depends on it=2E And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not >> supported otherwise=2E > >Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up=2E The task would b= e >to remove go-1=2E14, incorporating it into go-1=2E16, which currently >inherits from it=2E Any takers? > https://issues=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg/68300 Although it currently rebuilds all go packages=2E I should probably fix th= at=2E --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:39:23 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator