GNU bug report logs - #68223
[cuirass] Bogus (ancient) notifications sent

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 20:03:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 68223 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#68223; Package guix. (Tue, 02 Jan 2024 20:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 02 Jan 2024 20:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [cuirass] Bogus (ancient) notifications sent
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:02:40 -0500
Hello,

Following the qt-team branch builds, I just received today:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
From: cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass)
Subject: Build sound-juicer.aarch64-linux on qt-team is broken.
Newsgroups: qt-team
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 (54 years, 1 day, 6 hours ago)
Attachment: [3. text/html]...

<p>The build <b>sound-juicer.aarch64-linux</b> for specification <b>qt-team</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details">here</a>.</p>

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It's dated from 1970.  Prior to these I got some that were 10 weeks old.
I'm not sure what these were triggered by, but that seems a bug.
Ricardo hypothesized that "maybe it finally got around to building these
queued up jobs…?", which sounds like a potential explanation.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#68223; Package guix. (Tue, 02 Jan 2024 20:06:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: 68223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68223: [cuirass] Bogus (ancient) notifications sent
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:05:40 -0500
Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Following the qt-team branch builds, I just received today:
>
> From: cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass)
> Subject: Build sound-juicer.aarch64-linux on qt-team is broken.
> Newsgroups: qt-team
> Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0000 (54 years, 1 day, 6 hours ago)
> Attachment: [3. text/html]...
>
> <p>The build <b>sound-juicer.aarch64-linux</b> for specification <b>qt-team</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details">here</a>.</p>
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2187490/details
>
> It's dated from 1970.  Prior to these I got some that were 10 weeks old.
> I'm not sure what these were triggered by, but that seems a bug.
> Ricardo hypothesized that "maybe it finally got around to building these
> queued up jobs…?", which sounds like a potential explanation.

More context: these 1970 dated notifications occurred following
restarting the builds for which I had originally received 10 weeks dated
notifications.  They are still marked pending as "Scheduled", so I'm not
sure why a notification was sent.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 161 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.