GNU bug report logs - #68200
File local byte-compile-dynamic-docstrings:nil ignored?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #59 received at 68200 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, 68200 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 acm <at> muc.de
Subject: Re: bug#68200: 30.0.50; Emacs reloads init file when calling
 `documentation'
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 21:22:08 +0200

> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:10:58 +0000
> Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, 68200 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>   acm <at> muc.de
> From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
> 
> > No, 40MB is far from being negligible.
> 
> It's not negligible compared with the rest of Emacs, but is less than ¼%
> of the RAM in a machine with 16GB.

No, it isn't, because most of those 16GB are in use at any given
moment.

> No, the bug has been fixed.  But, as Michael pointed out, lots of things
> are being done with doc strings now which weren't being done when the
> dynamic doc strings were introduced.  Indeed, they were surely a
> workaround for limited RAM in machines a very long time ago.
> 
> Now that we're doing more with doc strings, the inconvenience of not
> getting a doc string after editing a source file might well outweigh the
> relatively small amount of RAM that these doc strings need.
> 
> Hence the suggestion to change the default.

Since I disagree with your argument about memory being available for
free, I also disagree with the suggestion that is based on that
argument.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.