GNU bug report logs -
#68200
File local byte-compile-dynamic-docstrings:nil ignored?
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:10:58 +0000
> Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, 68200 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> acm <at> muc.de
> From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
>
> > No, 40MB is far from being negligible.
>
> It's not negligible compared with the rest of Emacs, but is less than ΒΌ%
> of the RAM in a machine with 16GB.
No, it isn't, because most of those 16GB are in use at any given
moment.
> No, the bug has been fixed. But, as Michael pointed out, lots of things
> are being done with doc strings now which weren't being done when the
> dynamic doc strings were introduced. Indeed, they were surely a
> workaround for limited RAM in machines a very long time ago.
>
> Now that we're doing more with doc strings, the inconvenience of not
> getting a doc string after editing a source file might well outweigh the
> relatively small amount of RAM that these doc strings need.
>
> Hence the suggestion to change the default.
Since I disagree with your argument about memory being available for
free, I also disagree with the suggestion that is based on that
argument.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 133 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.