GNU bug report logs - #68145
[PATCH] * doc/misc/eglot.texi: Fix broken function calls

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Vyacheslav Akhmechet <coffeemug <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 11:56:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>,  Felician Nemeth <felician.nemeth <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 68145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Vyacheslav Akhmechet <coffeemug <at> gmail.com>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: bug#68145: [PATCH] * doc/misc/eglot.texi: Fix broken function calls
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 10:16:44 -0800
João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 1:45 PM Felician Nemeth
> <felician.nemeth <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Vyacheslav Akhmechet <coffeemug <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > -  (if-let* ((path (expand-file-name (eglot-uri-to-path
>> > +  (if-let* ((path (expand-file-name (eglot--uri-to-path
>>
>> The latest Eglot has this:
>>
>> (define-obsolete-function-alias 'eglot--uri-to-path 'eglot-uri-to-path "1.16")
>>
>> The confusion might come from the fact that ELPA had v1.16 for a brief
>> period, but now (for some strange reason) only v1.15 is available.
>
> Strange indeed.  No idea what happened, but the 1.16 tarball is also
> available:
>
> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/eglot-1.16.tar.lz
>
> Stefan, can you see about this.

I'm assuming the scripts bugged out.  I'm copying in the other Stefan,
since he has access to the server where this all runs.

The simplest solution in this case is probably to just bump the version
to 1.17, but that won't stop this from happening again in the future.

> Vyacheslav, Felicián is correct.  Don't suggest '--' version of
> functions in the manuals.  The remaining simplification is
> welcome.  Don't use the symbol name 'inactive--code' though,
> the '--' means "private".  That symbol can be "inactive-code"
> or 'my-inactive-code' or even 'my-extension--inactive-code'.
> Here though, "inactive-code" is preferable for demonstration
> purposes.
>
> João




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 131 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.