GNU bug report logs - #68119
[GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Erik A Johnson <JohnsonE <at> usc.edu>

Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 01:12:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 68186, 68190

Done: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Erik A Johnson <JohnsonE <at> usc.edu>
Subject: bug#68186: closed (Re: bug#68119: [GNU automake 1.16.5]
 test-suite 45 tests failed)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:48:08 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#68119: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed

which was filed against the automake package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 68186 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
68119: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68119
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: JohnsonE <at> usc.edu
Cc: 68119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68119: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:47:08 -0700
Erik, I think all the automake test problems you reported here have been
resolved (thanks to your excellent debugging). So closing. Leaving
#68808 open until Zack or I have a chance to look into testing of make
for the subsecond mtimes. Thanks again! -k

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Erik A Johnson <JohnsonE <at> usc.edu>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: "bug-automake <at> gnu.org" <bug-automake <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 23:04:07 +0000
Thanks, Karl.  automake-1.16.5/t/dist-vs-built-sources.dir/foo.c only has two lines:
#include "h.h"
int main (void) { printf ("%s\n", F); return 0; }

Also, automake-1.16.5/t/dist-vs-built-sources.sh only appears to be writing those two lines to foo.c and there is no inclusion of <stdio.h>.

Does that give you any clues?  Thx.

Erik

> On Dec 30, 2023, at 2:56 PM, Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org> wrote:
> 
>    Subject: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed
>    Clean install of macOS Sonoma 14.2.1 on MacBook Pro M3 max
> 
> Thanks for the report, but it seems like something in the environment is
> causing trouble. For example, one of the failing tests is
> dist-vs-built-sources.sh:
> 
>    gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"dist-vs-built-sources\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"dist-vs-built-sources\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.0\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"dist-vs-built-sources\ 1.0\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"dist-vs-built-sources\" -DVERSION=\"1.0\" -I.     -g -O2 -MT foo.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/foo.Tpo -c -o foo.o foo.c
>    foo.c:2:19: error: call to undeclared library function 'printf' with type 'int (const char *, ...)'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>    int main (void) { printf ("%s\n", F); return 0; }
>                      ^
>    foo.c:2:19: note: include the header <stdio.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'printf'
> 
> However, <stdio.h> is already included. The test program is these three
> lines (h.h is a trivial #define):
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include "h.h"
> int main (void) { printf ("%s\n", F); return 0; }
> 
> So the failure doesn't make sense to me.  I have no access to Sonoma or
> other way to debug, unfortunately.
> 
> The other failures also look like they relate to the test suite programs
> in this particular environment, rather than actual Automake
> functionality.
> 
> Maybe someone else here has an idea or a way to proceed. --thanks, karl.


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 106 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.