GNU bug report logs - #68075
30.0.50; New special form `handler-bind`

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 06:34:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 68075 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#68075: 30.0.50; New special form `handler-bind`
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 18:06:50 +0200
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: 68075 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 10:37:01 -0500
> 
> >> Could you give an example piece of code where this "confusing
> >> terminology" makes you unsure how things would work?
> > That's the quoted part of your patch at the beginning of this message.
> > It uses the word "dynamic" twice and "dynamic bindings" once.
> 
> So, IIUC, reading that text makes you feel unsure, but you don't really
> know what you're unsure of?

Oh, but I do: the two references to "dynamic", including one to
"dynamic binding" seem to indicate quite unequivocally that "dynamic
binding" vs "lexical binding" could be involved.

I wonder why it is so hard to understand this difficulty, when the
words basically speak for themselves.

> For this reason it would help if you could try and characterize more
> precisely what you find confusing.

I don't have anything else to say except point once again to your
wording, which  I already did several times...




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 139 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.