From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 27 09:07:01 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2023 14:07:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35548 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rIUYm-0005qE-L2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 09:07:01 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:39926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rIPcY-0001YP-EK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 03:50:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rIPcU-0003sP-56 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 03:50:30 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rIPcS-0006Zn-H7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 03:50:29 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50e4e3323a6so5760660e87.0 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 00:50:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703667026; x=1704271826; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/SEP4oxuvMIOBRjFiBkStz/dQoUKZSk8WUYbgrpUJEg=; b=BSD+rvJ4do4JvkmWibQzSVU8RRr1a2wV4A3HNP/LmbOGsX0lPPDEtAZ1+IXuWOeXOg C8X4CzjWyeAbCWLFOlTpHARvaHAeICQANy335XxuluEOdh0M7pFAoDGpiBkt32uwhvpR LVa/xK/sxICw0e/Og0GSc3/L6l3SoezDoxkBWF7v1+Pye+CWrRvdQSfzvuvQ3wG2P3DR 9EI8LqW1mAk7HThLNnUr0Vl7CG+vX0h5vB6XvGooKkMPktPhHAr6bR/Xrrcevu1nFvlm /TO+PNqVTdB3EUx6DAZhbgv2oIUmnC7QOz5vGh9vD6ODfeDXRESAB/Dc3iXLaSPNHkeI 9L/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703667026; x=1704271826; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/SEP4oxuvMIOBRjFiBkStz/dQoUKZSk8WUYbgrpUJEg=; b=XM9czEVUf8HLNv5tUctYqFAr88/7hkulbm7+PUaZ5chqmbE/zK2Rh6eH7Wj+CSjgzM 1YX8zvvmcJ3lLGP5GjGs0ef6c0yyIsThMAieQGXtcwx7DtPY584EOmDAKcVmIKoLb1e2 hoLAPJVZ0AU+AsbPzXWMP6+OriQ5QpDtKMBgk3FZliCQSD4400YNGLxKeqFLf40GKs9b JoFYIU7J9xsMxePNQAvXXf+JKinDMZVLFhtGH+4M9uTmAuHE/eoWDNbaZbVhW0svurVv wXA4+GAGbSVeck5Viq0A8JSz4VB775hEiwtzLUYZilV3HFCQSvlniuaTCZYp4ZK3Wayz /ajw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz780Ce+YqXKVEBbFWBZvKG7KYmgJnTVdT2fi+pZ4U3tNELqcta WOLm/ZcJPYoLQGgO1Tcb6ouuZv0A578= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGzZFcfCRsr9guGQfAmYW/uFiufalKdRftoDYXW2m52QtdBYoDajiISzWRfW9W29xHTDEzbtA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5dda:0:b0:50e:3ed9:d30d with SMTP id x26-20020ac25dda000000b0050e3ed9d30dmr4352452lfq.3.1703667026454; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 00:50:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (78.79-160-60.customer.lyse.net. [79.160.60.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t27-20020ac243bb000000b0050e798243a7sm995183lfl.177.2023.12.27.00.50.25 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Dec 2023 00:50:25 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 30.0.50 From: Lars Rustand To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Mismatching defconfig options Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 09:35:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87il4kjagi.fsf@yoga.mail-host-address-is-not-set> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::132; envelope-from=rustand.lars@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x132.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 09:06:59 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) I'm having trouble building a custom kernel with an included defconfig. The kernel builds correctly with the included defconfig if I do it manually, but when I try to build it through Guix I get an error about Mismatching configurations in .config and arch/arm64/configs/guix_defconfig. Since it builds correctly manually I am sure that the defconfig does in fact work, and it does not have any mismatching configuration. So it must be something that Guix adds/changes in the defconfig that makes it stop working. How can I prevent Guix from modifying the defconfig that I tell it to use? Here is the relevant part of my package definition: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (let ((linux-package (customize-linux #:name name #:linux linux #:defconfig "pinephone_pro_defconfig" #:extra-version "arm64-pinephone-pro" #:source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (linux-pinephone-urls version)) (sha256 (base32 hash))))))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 27 11:55:24 2023 Received: (at 68059) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2023 16:55:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37672 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rIXBk-0005gQ-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 11:55:24 -0500 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:57366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rIXBi-0005gH-6p for 68059@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 11:55:22 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C5777184F64; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 16:55:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1703696122; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mbc/aS3oHqs3gVHMck4vlqnuzogfcpA9XRNXQH5ee0w=; b=SBSAiBFC3u65DVgrJQRGRoY1UlCiq7QJNMppefObh8iKX560j6rwUaFTAG8R+ohU/giwz1 LoEGM1izWWYCoNZDVpOWEQHDolD2KsDbRTlcwhB6IjN2oyGqP5aHi5FI28XO7D8dmuK/AC HzD2dwVtbyJye+lXyYtDGIv4HCQX5hik6CO4y8B4FcQDyIHzTeTd7Cho/iIPiU7LS3remS xelC6htcvJCMMOsMQowZe20vMr9JyfgJtKS4YK2MDkcYiLF2/FUpeUsvOsoxbSPAxDV/ei NNFfNARZwDavJK+dwJi9JoGauKbEi5isKpkQ03O0urdb8VrD0vBW2TZz8CqInA== From: Josselin Poiret To: Lars Rustand , 68059@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#68059: Mismatching defconfig options In-Reply-To: <87il4kjagi.fsf@yoga.mail-host-address-is-not-set> References: <87il4kjagi.fsf@yoga.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 17:55:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87zfxvvb49.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68059 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Lars, Lars Rustand writes: > I'm having trouble building a custom kernel with an included > defconfig. The kernel builds correctly with the included defconfig if I > do it manually, but when I try to build it through Guix I get an error > about Mismatching configurations in .config and > arch/arm64/configs/guix_defconfig. Could you post the exact error that you get? > Since it builds correctly manually I am sure that the defconfig does in > fact work, and it does not have any mismatching configuration. So it > must be something that Guix adds/changes in the defconfig that makes it > stop working. How can I prevent Guix from modifying the defconfig that I > tell it to use? Guix doesn't modify the defconfig you give it, it just moves it to guix_defconfig. However, it then tries to verify that the defconfig was properly applied, which is completely Guix-specific and might be the thing that doesn't work properly. > Here is the relevant part of my package definition: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (let ((linux-package > (customize-linux > #:name name > #:linux linux > #:defconfig > "pinephone_pro_defconfig" > #:extra-version "arm64-pinephone-pro" > #:source (origin (method url-fetch) > (uri (linux-pinephone-urls version)) > (sha256 (base32 hash))))))) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Best, =2D-=20 Josselin Poiret --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHEBAEBCAAuFiEEOSSM2EHGPMM23K8vUF5AuRYXGooFAmWMVvYQHGRldkBqcG9p cmV0Lnh5egAKCRBQXkC5FhcaijQXC/4pMdZkJkUj8Kk964BhJeCkUHKu7v3+EOTu Dsbs0H9LteLcmfW7h5jBzZj09TZpGmgnEkxgFVC+Ti25enwZC9qtRKNCVFlXf4yP ni4xry7TGCkZzW/7B4uEF2nAdfKNZ519v0X/1mB0QYaLuVFNONkUgyzzqllnW3zN q9xfcv3IW1JAO0fjA/TypgU8wIlSKH6ArIBnRaIEatDvAW0Pj7z6hXfNQ1HqlCvC vr/CFq117hdro2UU3iSX3VdwASOpAf6z50iDQ9S+zNg6BJqVJUgQekx8pErfKmhe By2i3uEWij5bja/GbDZ+99llJXypZU9D4hw5FI1j9RrYdlIEta7k6fVJnATvR3R0 UirldN2ZMSlBFi2wlJwgSjSou+MiI6Mbalmw+SklVSaMk/c7fI/hK1kqzPFkWKme oHsDd05+seke0BcUChfIb+fAlUfDgAOFhnPCaojCaND4ySxSKsQRnXTxZ5GEuclh A0pisCqDyiV1Ffcj6sFy7rdw8Pg/8Xs= =8Swe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 30 06:55:10 2023 Received: (at 68059) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2023 11:55:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rJXvq-0003wI-1c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 06:55:10 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::130]:56431) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rJWrR-0008JT-Jk for 68059@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 05:46:34 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50e49a0b5caso8420475e87.0 for <68059@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 02:46:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703933186; x=1704537986; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QU66sx80pYAciTkgjUTCLVVPZUFSovrSgtEYx95kiPk=; b=G/Gbq8rzM4GugYRZWtMdAWtKs0wwSWRaOUimT/FKAsuX+Lrr4/zOfKMa4r/Gu0KDE4 2IazXHBROBBpTWcyGD9aeaV09q4tyC57ux0SRs0NECe+wsQjkPvaaPj3dP/l5Fj/cVIe Iz133Vvph93UH+OHbQw2m4C6JMzYyEscYtSQ8oIP3AGRUXJf1mM+8eOZ3oMNtV0uLSW4 Qe54mXviJUeZyVY4uNE64oIemQMI5B9LmOFLEp5viHA1nEySQloNY9qYgkuKY+Uu1KVI keM0gDm9dwQgDfyCmJzKoaJ5/NwPLT6MhsyTaWuYl69rc6rd+Ec8dYJHV8wCvNgJ67Ul qmqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703933186; x=1704537986; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=QU66sx80pYAciTkgjUTCLVVPZUFSovrSgtEYx95kiPk=; b=saUCOToNAj+nrfT2GNpvr2kpDSDH0i86LVZAjtJ35Uj3xbBigY6CfNk1ryniJTTH7b +dO83ghBFlKmod6yyzf4qD+vjxyarlHxGv171nGWMyv39HvbA/XiVdPFHnMXkoLSwaOf FWMxziP4luENiAOxDkHo1FpxDSSDGxY8AVvRQKoXia2lYvVggl3+8qgPdIThIrfXZfV+ HaNx9ZhSDApSOYz2ALiu8RD4MErTg2D+HoSLvr5DPC/ZL7jQnAwYqUzmW6ZB3oYlwyrj FoTqihUOTwTEVhvku/p/vTGsjfIbf5hVuUlg6hqsdwSVUjY1kgilCHPxAGQ2o/Dwj485 +rvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyN07nMrSqc8p5i4p216new8RYsFWIbk9gOdPTkxpjSc3ltmaSa OeURtgk3Lg0/IgjFRBs0TpDFLLbDADU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFGM2ALwV0NANZGXf3Uzl4ULUmfFXn1aC811HhIJnJyZAwXb2iC6irab4nf8dlq+IrZNvZWPg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:ba6:b0:50e:7be8:4704 with SMTP id b38-20020a0565120ba600b0050e7be84704mr4469504lfv.81.1703933186345; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 02:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (78.79-160-60.customer.lyse.net. [79.160.60.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k23-20020ac24577000000b0050e7a0064d9sm1853078lfm.7.2023.12.30.02.46.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 30 Dec 2023 02:46:25 -0800 (PST) References: <87il4kjagi.fsf@yoga.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87zfxvvb49.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 30.0.50 From: Lars Rustand To: 68059@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#68059: Mismatching defconfig options Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 11:39:51 +0100 In-reply-to: <87zfxvvb49.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Message-ID: <871qb4ynlv.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68059 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 06:55:08 -0500 Cc: Josselin Poiret X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Josselin Poiret writes: > Guix doesn't modify the defconfig you give it, it just moves it to > guix_defconfig. However, it then tries to verify that the defconfig was > properly applied, which is completely Guix-specific and might be the > thing that doesn't work properly. Thanks, this must be it. I guess there is an option in the config that does not apply correctly, but since there is no verification in the normal build process it only causes a problem in Guix. Deleting the problematic line in the defconfig made it build correctly, so I guess this is not a problem in Guix, but in the defconfig I was trying to use. This issue can be closed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 12 05:18:08 2024 Received: (at 68059-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2024 10:18:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOEc4-0004vB-9n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 05:18:08 -0500 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:50832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOEby-0004ul-WB for 68059-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 05:18:06 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EF02B185328; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:18:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1705054683; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eV6pvsJv8pkPiF6SyyeWMVXYqV9XubbVYXTopgc10Ww=; b=Q+wDxPMf0UsqC1xynB8RpZhEt4ANlnbB9G5BJlmRyVmfPheKqBzRC4wcZ82dDU2Ml75lmW 4k+gaz5fzi7ux+op9sESCBYeiateWZyEEy+vYYR5mcXdLwLtHZcs/M+fcojxpCSWAvl4l9 lPHqpVNgGQWVNU98E94/DCnr55v3UsHIeD9m9B8o7jx+fTsu/Hu784HiqgOkmf4EMS092i tJxkmfv6tKQBo06l9iWEMiJZJEdZ3Kg/QCs+PM4M9LiB+f7Hzj1/dDWdjTg44E75fvOMbe R4Vdd4nD0v0b/EgHiCgtHfjY/+JE5U08dzyTJzTDX7s52v7rLrcxgh5W9AZzMA== From: Josselin Poiret To: Lars Rustand , 68059-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#68059: Mismatching defconfig options In-Reply-To: <871qb4ynlv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87il4kjagi.fsf@yoga.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87zfxvvb49.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <871qb4ynlv.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 11:17:56 +0100 Message-ID: <8734v2j1nv.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 68059-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Lars, Lars Rustand writes: > This issue can be closed. You can close issues by replying to XXXX-done@debbugs.gnu.org instead of XXXX@, as I'm doing here. Best, =2D-=20 Josselin Poiret --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHEBAEBCAAuFiEEOSSM2EHGPMM23K8vUF5AuRYXGooFAmWhEdQQHGRldkBqcG9p cmV0Lnh5egAKCRBQXkC5Fhcaip1tC/93vaWbqUzQpdk9gGJhi9hsJWBPrbux4FWG SN0jZwTWuhquqr7w6Ot0hFF2ukEGkVWiKWRVQezBrfBVVJcdkCdAwoMNrrH1dL56 ma6s+CfEyYY+8OBPHdmLzhMF/ZSSmBWv5kZJSTrVzaBa+eEACul8cWsmiM2a5kLd Y3kgnZlPkigRvTNiU6b1TS6WkLbABd9xvV/6XpPLQs/Ch0DFNylpHkn9/Ik0D+MT pfmgXNI/tCE70k/oqk1l7TxMj/awCOJLU6eHz6i+xe0hUr85AFbrhRD48JxHC2GW 7fsgZ158sRv7cGtBzyIl2Yff3zBOIqZqKHlqRptBXbR/+xgMlP2QoO/796VQKt2X bG9l60xOWtXolWk4ZOf3fuiECEUPYbKEWM35FP5CrOJ0IEm0C9Y9G7ZF7cWauasI Nib0VF/nZdJfe9v/iGL4HpNBWGsWWW/0+Uu0hBscLVWpQiQyf8tAs625BqZ3VwOL WsDwZOP/3tlSXYnI19904KxkR04H/mg= =Ut7R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:40:14 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 12:24:13 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator