From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 05 13:24:14 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2010 17:24:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh4Aw-00049P-0w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:24:14 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh4Au-00049K-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:24:13 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:57590) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh4BQ-0001tT-GI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:24:44 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40729 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh2pY-0004aH-AZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:58:19 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh2ng-00029z-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:56:13 -0400 Received: from ets.anubex.com ([194.78.75.179]:39759 helo=mail.anubex.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh2ng-00029P-M1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:56:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (kraatos.anubex.internal [127.0.0.1]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0321BEB2724; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:07:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at anubex.com Received: from mail.anubex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.anubex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RA7Ye1OCNCqc; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:07:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from leeloo.anubex.internal (leeloo.anubex.internal [192.168.14.202]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33561EAC63C; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:07:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tim by leeloo.anubex.internal with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OgyHu-0004V7-Vx; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:07:02 +0200 From: Tim Van Holder To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.50; pc-selection-mode no longer plays nice with dired (or vice versa) Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:07:02 +0200 Message-ID: <871vadl3mx.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) Dired normally has the up and down arrows bound to dired-previous-line (also bound to [p]) and dired-next-line (also bound to [n]), respectively. However, when pc-selection-mode is enabled, these bindings are apparently overridden now, to previous-line-nomark and next-line-nomark, respectively, breaking the normal dired navigation (point is not automatically put on the file name). Looking at 'C-h m' for dired in an older emacs version (a 23.0.60.1 build) and today's bzr head, the cause seems to be that while the older dired explicitly bound and , the current dired seems to rely on remapping and instead. In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.10 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2010-08-05 on leeloo Windowing system distributor `The Cygwin/X Project', version 11.0.10503000 configured using `configure '--with-x'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 05 16:41:18 2010 Received: (at 6803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2010 20:41:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh7Fe-0005bA-Jn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:41:18 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh7Fd-0005b5-JU for 6803@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:41:17 -0400 Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so2666730gwa.3 for <6803@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:41:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y6Pd9G0kNE+O+bhKBy+K6j/JoENDTjFD3+nTCbuU1NI=; b=JO30wPLOlzFqhNpTYdd64wqcbk5Z7Xm7N6oVPX3cfDnzpyrcMdSjXwEF4hfvFj/j2e TkN6GhSguQC6sVtKZaULQ2fgwtpAYtW7tJ9KSnBkJ7Ba45e3vByeGR088de1j3x+ZEW5 6SRoi8UFhQVyTJbS7fJoluLqBIxjfPFi+SRf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZSrFlrq7V8LGquwP5U7t2shnQt4RqAboNLsRrIkNciisduatFqy25O0UZ7c/j8zoZj ZX3STTw3cvVUiq+k+z+evCkjUFafEMHtY8zyMQyjDI4pxl/i/TmGz+q1rqOsbRncst7H YdHDaiX3yokz7K4FmadjWP3u/Jjic1IFgN1XU= Received: by 10.101.167.5 with SMTP id u5mr12744607ano.6.1281040909316; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:41:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.162.4 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871vadl3mx.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> References: <871vadl3mx.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:41:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6803: 24.0.50; pc-selection-mode no longer plays nice with dired (or vice versa) To: Tim Van Holder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6803 Cc: 6803@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 13:07, Tim Van Holder wrot= e: > Dired normally has the up and down arrows bound to dired-previous-line > (also bound to [p]) and dired-next-line (also bound to [n]), respectively= . > However, when pc-selection-mode is enabled, these bindings are > apparently overridden now, to previous-line-nomark and next-line-nomark, > respectively, breaking the normal dired navigation (point is not > automatically put on the file name). > Looking at 'C-h m' for dired in an older emacs version (a 23.0.60.1 > build) and today's bzr head, the cause seems to be that while the older > dired explicitly bound and , the current dired seems to rely > on remapping and instead. Right, this is a consequence of bug#6632 and revno:100864. Perhaps it should be reverted, but then, the use case mentioned in the bug will still be there. Opinions? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 06 02:49:27 2010 Received: (at 6803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2010 06:49:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhGkB-0001DS-Ga for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:49:27 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhGk9-0001DN-JG for 6803@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:49:26 -0400 Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2698809fxm.3 for <6803@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:49:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CJjKaLdT6CKY+ccIoj19Ljs0gOmMoswZu9Mv88pXjmc=; b=DR1cHqPqZfLKq4Om0KM1QMzH5HolGcB/8D/U71pknqW6G/WHTcxoyma93ya9wGTeo4 URS6Fl/ikiMHOgZAzzBASUj//08tsEY76Ce969RZLxrWC3w2HyYtzkp+vSVjmSuO8u1H 5PinOBSXp5gPO8eEdQTi0nKFl9uII9iXuPpf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sR930foirNtqNqsVDtvVzrpWBMTL06XXG8I4OE5bcmBKyLVZsADHUK+5xuh8ktz4zR Xt7c72FqtR6JY5LvKn73HYeYq3SYaAgJNaKS1+IsXZmHUHVxor4DkNqDtp9lKjmRONDU 8zzL/v3A1TKd+TQYBRvRymqpY8YiPvpBOmrCM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.49.196 with SMTP id w4mr7760199bkf.73.1281077397919; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.102.196 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <871vadl3mx.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:49:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6803: 24.0.50; pc-selection-mode no longer plays nice with dired (or vice versa) From: Tim Van Holder To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6803 Cc: 6803@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) On 5 August 2010 22:41, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 13:07, Tim Van Holder wr= ote: >> Dired normally has the up and down arrows bound to dired-previous-line >> (also bound to [p]) and dired-next-line (also bound to [n]), respectivel= y. >> However, when pc-selection-mode is enabled, these bindings are >> apparently overridden now, to previous-line-nomark and next-line-nomark, >> respectively, breaking the normal dired navigation (point is not >> automatically put on the file name). >> Looking at 'C-h m' for dired in an older emacs version (a 23.0.60.1 >> build) and today's bzr head, the cause seems to be that while the older >> dired explicitly bound and , the current dired seems to rely >> on remapping and instead. > > Right, this is a consequence of bug#6632 and revno:100864. > > Perhaps it should be reverted, but then, the use case mentioned in the > bug will still be there. > > Opinions? > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma Do dired-next/previous-line set the mark? If not (or if it's likely that the distinction does not really matter in dired mode), I suppose dired could just remap the -nomark variants of next/previous-line too. If it does, maybe it could add -nomark variants of its own functions? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 18 08:57:38 2021 Received: (at 6803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 12:57:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m56MT-00082o-Nc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:57:38 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m56MS-00082Y-0Y for 6803@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:57:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2ShoZK5G/QcWYq4R9Y6onwnk2G4aNuj3H7Z62rkwDWA=; b=ire6nWQ+HCdxRtaQQmPgFhydqq 2ncDlM59E2nXYC7LEkeYDqWTAHAiWdiRywSSqnngNpc+E1nzXlPObcSlOOXmrQfjG5Ar6Y5sCo9Va YQSQ6IQTBjhXh7gPoSNeSMdf/vOgqsQcNLhuj78tE4Kk2oUluKR0KN/IJU+YJCTKEoDg=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m56MJ-0000ii-3x; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:57:29 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#6803: 24.0.50; pc-selection-mode no longer plays nice with dired (or vice versa) References: <871vadl3mx.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> X-Now-Playing: The Meters's _Gettin' Funkier All The Time (1): Here Comes The Meter Man & Looka-Ya Py Py_: "Thinking" Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:57:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:41:29 +0200") Message-ID: <87eebvsrt5.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 13:07, Tim Van Holder wrote: >> Dired normally has the up and down arrows bound to dired-previous-line >> (also bound to [p]) and dired-next-line (al [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6803 Cc: Tim Van Holder , 6803@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 13:07, Tim Van Holder wrote: >> Dired normally has the up and down arrows bound to dired-previous-line >> (also bound to [p]) and dired-next-line (also bound to [n]), respectively. >> However, when pc-selection-mode is enabled, these bindings are >> apparently overridden now, to previous-line-nomark and next-line-nomark, >> respectively, breaking the normal dired navigation (point is not >> automatically put on the file name). >> Looking at 'C-h m' for dired in an older emacs version (a 23.0.60.1 >> build) and today's bzr head, the cause seems to be that while the older >> dired explicitly bound and , the current dired seems to rely >> on remapping and instead. > > Right, this is a consequence of bug#6632 and revno:100864. > > Perhaps it should be reverted, but then, the use case mentioned in the > bug will still be there. > > Opinions? This was ten years ago, and nobody had any opinions. The patch in question removed the direct bindings... We allow modes all over the place to bind `C-n' (there's apparently around 100 of these in the Emacs tree), so I don't think Dired was doing anything wrong here. I haven't looked at pc-selection-mode, though -- is this problem still present in recent Emacs versions? diff --git a/lisp/dired.el b/lisp/dired.el index c3d1435..0e5cc22 100644 --- a/lisp/dired.el +++ b/lisp/dired.el @@ -1380,10 +1380,8 @@ Do so according to the former subdir alist OLD-SUBDIR-ALIST." (define-key map ">" 'dired-next-dirline) (define-key map "^" 'dired-up-directory) (define-key map " " 'dired-next-line) - (define-key map "\C-n" 'dired-next-line) - (define-key map "\C-p" 'dired-previous-line) - (define-key map [down] 'dired-next-line) - (define-key map [up] 'dired-previous-line) + (define-key map [remap next-line] 'dired-next-line) + (define-key map [remap previous-line] 'dired-previous-line) ;; hiding (define-key map "$" 'dired-hide-subdir) (define-key map "\M-$" 'dired-hide-all) @@ -1393,7 +1391,7 @@ Do so according to the former subdir alist OLD-SUBDIR-ALIST." (define-key map (kbd "M-s f C-s") 'dired-isearch-filenames) (define-key map (kbd "M-s f M-C-s") 'dired-isearch-filenames-regexp) ;; misc - (define-key map "\C-x\C-q" 'dired-toggle-read-only) + (define-key map [remap toggle-read-only] 'dired-toggle-read-only) (define-key map "?" 'dired-summary) (define-key map "\177" 'dired-unmark-backward) (define-key map [remap undo] 'dired-undo) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 18 08:57:41 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 12:57:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55397 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m56MX-000833-3M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:57:41 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m56MV-00082d-FN for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:57:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Mj99w3tnmshSb/rHcSuXn/MJ30dgqrsKss5C72i/Nio=; b=saYaEZ1zZwEaEPnhqHXvStry64 vvG3M6rHE1MFR6l0CibkX2PiGtocbLDCZvv4b5WI3dOHnGRGGpuRmoL67DRD+9OPpbocjtGvdKeSt QXtv/pombRSvnrEnjIIYUGG4qyouZKvuBhe9p4GYFkfFG6xvnvQb+IvtBK0huOa85lAk=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m56MN-0000ip-Qz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:57:33 +0200 Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:57:31 +0200 Message-Id: <87czrfsrt0.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6803 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 6803 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 6803 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 16 08:13:01 2021 Received: (at 6803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2021 12:13:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFbU8-00032g-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:13:01 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFbU2-00032H-UA for 6803@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:12:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zXSz1h0UGw5749IGOu5l1K32/osuiypyA84z6NrMm0I=; b=o+HM9dIWzr+mfgdh3+0a6aKmN8 7kz+djFZG8WncTGzzOAChuUft+XvV7hg7ISHGccvqQc4dQYakd71fy6ctkLy3JXfB1ypqrfD8zLKI 61C3MM9nJ4o6ZcoRN7hBnHY7pIkbMC31udyl1VSVEh2qkyTtuQ3UYK7blL7R7SgtcoWo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mFbTs-0004a2-Df; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 14:12:45 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#6803: 24.0.50; pc-selection-mode no longer plays nice with dired (or vice versa) References: <871vadl3mx.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> <87eebvsrt5.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 14:12:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87eebvsrt5.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:57:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87lf51egg8.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > We allow modes all over the place to bind `C-n' (there's apparently > around 100 of these in the Emacs tree), so I don't think Dired was doing > anything wrong here. > > I haven't looked at pc-selec [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6803 Cc: Tim Van Holder , 6803@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > We allow modes all over the place to bind `C-n' (there's apparently > around 100 of these in the Emacs tree), so I don't think Dired was doing > anything wrong here. > > I haven't looked at pc-selection-mode, though -- is this problem still > present in recent Emacs versions? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 16 08:13:05 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2021 12:13:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFbUD-00032v-7m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:13:05 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42930) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFbU7-00032P-86 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:12:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KjrtI9G69JtAnD4OXxhP75lf3GYqusuN94XD8m5nHro=; b=dnpERjkWDd6+WzOhiHUTYLwFO1 k2LOfRhPnIc77P4X2rU/sALK9tRXcTEi3Oij8AKsTF1m+BFBlS+dfWTw18O17XkryBB/Omdz5/rao Q+i+ia8QuUdq4j6xYYY7d48RuYuQhNhWb1LSjbGV05wEj56SyNwR5L/BNl0AI4R6u1cc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mFbTz-0004aB-HP for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 14:12:49 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 14:12:46 +0200 Message-Id: <87k0klegg1.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6803 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 6803 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 6803 quit From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:07:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator