From unknown Mon Aug 18 09:04:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime? Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6794 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 6794@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128093311232484 (code B ref -1); Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:46:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2010 14:45:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgfDS-0008Rt-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:45:12 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6K-0007TO-Op for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:29:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:39386) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6n-0000Ee-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:09 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50237 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ogd6l-0007Jl-B9 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:08 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD, HTML_MESSAGE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6k-0004Ed-4G for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:07 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:51750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6j-0004CW-Ly for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:06 -0400 Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L6M006P7O1V1A@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L6M00D4AO1VLB@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from m00135360 ([10.147.194.85]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L6M007ZNO1VL0@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:55 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:54 +0800 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83?= Message-id: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w)" Thread-index: Acsz0L4NlnRpjRRGR2mHgY+ix6Vw4g== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:45:10 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w) Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi GNU I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of uptime. I found the timer invalidation. I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error happen. If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug. thangk you very much! Regards Xieweihua --Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w) Content-type: text/html; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Hi GNU
 
   I have a problem = about uptime. I have a=20 timer depend on the value of uptime. I found the timer=20 invalidation.
 
I want to know  if the = uptime will  invalid=20 or not,when some error happen. If uptime have bug,please tell me how to = avoid=20 the bug.
 
thangk you very = much!
 
 
Regards
Xieweihua

 
--Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w)-- From unknown Mon Aug 18 09:04:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime? Resent-From: Bob Proulx Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6794 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83?= Cc: 6794@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6794.12809353731052 (code B ref 6794); Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:23:01 +0000 Received: (at 6794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2010 15:22:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogfnx-0000Gv-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:22:53 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogfnv-0000Gn-Tr; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:22:52 -0400 Received: from dementia.proulx.com (dementia.proulx.com [192.168.230.115]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DF921311; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:23:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dementia.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A0D33CC33A; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:23:20 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:23:20 -0600 From: Bob Proulx Message-ID: <20100804152320.GA26421@dementia.proulx.com> References: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) tags 6794 + moreinfo thanks =E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83 wrote: > I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of > uptime. I found the timer invalidation. > =20 > I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error happ= en. > If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug.=20 Thank you for your bug report. However I was not able to understand your question. As far as we know there is no bug in uptime. Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing. The uptime command should produce output similar to this following. $ uptime 09:21:05 up 12 days, 8:25, 15 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00 Also please show us the version of the program that you are using. $ uptime --version Bob From unknown Mon Aug 18 09:04:29 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83?= Subject: bug#6794: closed (Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime?) Message-ID: References: <20101227031005.GA30361@hysteria.proulx.com> <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 6794 X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Reply-To: 6794@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 03:04:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1293419042-11295-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1293419042-11295-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #6794: if there is a bug with uptime? which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 6794@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 6794: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6794 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1293419042-11295-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 6794-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2010 03:03:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PX3Mm-0002vF-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:03:21 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PX3Ml-0002v5-Nj for 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:03:20 -0500 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1058721363; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:10:06 -0700 (MST) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2A382DD7B; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:10:05 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:10:05 -0700 From: Bob Proulx To: =?utf-8?B?6ams5ZiJ6LeD?= Subject: Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime? Message-ID: <20101227031005.GA30361@hysteria.proulx.com> References: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> <20100804152320.GA26421@dementia.proulx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100804152320.GA26421@dementia.proulx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6794-done Cc: 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Because there has been no response for 144 days and I do not think this is a bug I am closing it. Bob Bob Proulx wrote: > tags 6794 + moreinfo > thanks >=20 > =E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83 wrote: > > I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value = of > > uptime. I found the timer invalidation. > > =20 > > I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error ha= ppen. > > If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug.=20 >=20 > Thank you for your bug report. However I was not able to understand > your question. As far as we know there is no bug in uptime. >=20 > Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing. The > uptime command should produce output similar to this following. >=20 > $ uptime > 09:21:05 up 12 days, 8:25, 15 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.0= 0 >=20 > Also please show us the version of the program that you are using. >=20 > $ uptime --version >=20 > Bob ------------=_1293419042-11295-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2010 14:45:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgfDS-0008Rt-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:45:12 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6K-0007TO-Op for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:29:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:39386) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6n-0000Ee-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:09 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50237 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ogd6l-0007Jl-B9 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:08 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD, HTML_MESSAGE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6k-0004Ed-4G for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:07 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:51750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6j-0004CW-Ly for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:06 -0400 Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L6M006P7O1V1A@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L6M00D4AO1VLB@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from m00135360 ([10.147.194.85]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L6M007ZNO1VL0@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:55 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:54 +0800 From: =?gb2312?B?wu28ztS+?= Subject: if there is a bug with uptime? To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Message-id: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w)" Thread-index: Acsz0L4NlnRpjRRGR2mHgY+ix6Vw4g== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:45:10 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w) Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi GNU I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of uptime. I found the timer invalidation. I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error happen. If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug. thangk you very much! Regards Xieweihua --Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w) Content-type: text/html; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Hi GNU
 
   I have a problem = about uptime. I have a=20 timer depend on the value of uptime. I found the timer=20 invalidation.
 
I want to know  if the = uptime will  invalid=20 or not,when some error happen. If uptime have bug,please tell me how to = avoid=20 the bug.
 
thangk you very = much!
 
 
Regards
Xieweihua

 
--Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w)-- ------------=_1293419042-11295-1--