From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 10:45:12 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2010 14:45:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgfDS-0008Rt-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:45:12 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6K-0007TO-Op for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:29:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:39386) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6n-0000Ee-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:09 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50237 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ogd6l-0007Jl-B9 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:08 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD, HTML_MESSAGE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6k-0004Ed-4G for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:07 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:51750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogd6j-0004CW-Ly for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:06 -0400 Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L6M006P7O1V1A@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L6M00D4AO1VLB@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from m00135360 ([10.147.194.85]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L6M007ZNO1VL0@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:55 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:54 +0800 From: =?gb2312?B?wu28ztS+?= Subject: if there is a bug with uptime? To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Message-id: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w)" Thread-index: Acsz0L4NlnRpjRRGR2mHgY+ix6Vw4g== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:45:10 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w) Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi GNU I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of uptime. I found the timer invalidation. I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error happen. If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug. thangk you very much! Regards Xieweihua --Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w) Content-type: text/html; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Hi GNU
 
   I have a problem = about uptime. I have a=20 timer depend on the value of uptime. I found the timer=20 invalidation.
 
I want to know  if the = uptime will  invalid=20 or not,when some error happen. If uptime have bug,please tell me how to = avoid=20 the bug.
 
thangk you very = much!
 
 
Regards
Xieweihua

 
--Boundary_(ID_8CKUkAAKx7/JA36oRxoB8w)-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 11:22:53 2010 Received: (at 6794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2010 15:22:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogfnx-0000Gv-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:22:53 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogfnv-0000Gn-Tr; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:22:52 -0400 Received: from dementia.proulx.com (dementia.proulx.com [192.168.230.115]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DF921311; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:23:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dementia.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A0D33CC33A; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:23:20 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:23:20 -0600 From: Bob Proulx To: =?utf-8?B?6ams5ZiJ6LeD?= Subject: Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime? Message-ID: <20100804152320.GA26421@dementia.proulx.com> References: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6794 Cc: 6794@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) tags 6794 + moreinfo thanks =E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83 wrote: > I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of > uptime. I found the timer invalidation. > =20 > I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error happ= en. > If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug.=20 Thank you for your bug report. However I was not able to understand your question. As far as we know there is no bug in uptime. Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing. The uptime command should produce output similar to this following. $ uptime 09:21:05 up 12 days, 8:25, 15 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00 Also please show us the version of the program that you are using. $ uptime --version Bob From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 26 22:03:21 2010 Received: (at 6794-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2010 03:03:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PX3Mm-0002vF-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:03:21 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PX3Ml-0002v5-Nj for 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:03:20 -0500 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1058721363; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:10:06 -0700 (MST) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2A382DD7B; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:10:05 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:10:05 -0700 From: Bob Proulx To: =?utf-8?B?6ams5ZiJ6LeD?= Subject: Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime? Message-ID: <20101227031005.GA30361@hysteria.proulx.com> References: <836A93CDAE0842D6AEA95303D8D6FCAF@china.huawei.com> <20100804152320.GA26421@dementia.proulx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100804152320.GA26421@dementia.proulx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6794-done Cc: 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Because there has been no response for 144 days and I do not think this is a bug I am closing it. Bob Bob Proulx wrote: > tags 6794 + moreinfo > thanks >=20 > =E9=A9=AC=E5=98=89=E8=B7=83 wrote: > > I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value = of > > uptime. I found the timer invalidation. > > =20 > > I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error ha= ppen. > > If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug.=20 >=20 > Thank you for your bug report. However I was not able to understand > your question. As far as we know there is no bug in uptime. >=20 > Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing. The > uptime command should produce output similar to this following. >=20 > $ uptime > 09:21:05 up 12 days, 8:25, 15 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.0= 0 >=20 > Also please show us the version of the program that you are using. >=20 > $ uptime --version >=20 > Bob From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 26 22:57:24 2010 Received: (at 6794-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2010 03:57:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PX4D3-0004nn-1Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:57:24 -0500 Received: from [119.145.14.64] (helo=szxga01-in.huawei.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PX3Ya-0003AQ-5T for 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:15:34 -0500 Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LE200H0NHBS2I@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:21:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LE200M4THBR0B@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:21:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from m00135360 ([10.147.217.55]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LE2007MGHBRBQ@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:21:27 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:21:26 +0800 From: =?gb2312?B?wu28ztS+?= Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogYnVnIzY3OTQ6IGlmIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgYnVnIHdpdGggdXB0aW0=?= =?gb2312?B?ZT8=?= In-reply-to: <20101227031005.GA30361@hysteria.proulx.com> To: 'Bob Proulx' Message-id: <17C7A513BD854889B33E2BC9828F0433@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Thread-index: AculdOb4QRi03E95SDqmjO8ePkAvIgAADFzQ X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6794-done X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:57:19 -0500 Cc: 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Ok, thank you.=20 Ma Jiayue http://www.huawei.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- --------------------------------------------------------- =B1=BE=D3=CA=BC=FE=BC=B0=C6=E4=B8=BD=BC=FE=BA=AC=D3=D0=BB=AA=CE=AA=B9=AB=CB= =BE=B5=C4=B1=A3=C3=DC=D0=C5=CF=A2=A3=AC=BD=F6=CF=DE=D3=DA=B7=A2=CB=CD=B8=F8= =C9=CF=C3=E6=B5=D8=D6=B7=D6=D0=C1=D0=B3=F6=B5=C4=B8=F6=C8=CB=BB=F2=C8=BA =D7=E9=A1=A3=BD=FB =D6=B9=C8=CE=BA=CE=C6=E4=CB=FB=C8=CB=D2=D4=C8=CE=BA=CE=D0=CE=CA=BD=CA=B9=D3= =C3=A3=A8=B0=FC=C0=A8=B5=AB=B2=BB=CF=DE=D3=DA=C8=AB=B2=BF=BB=F2=B2=BF=B7=D6= =B5=D8=D0=B9=C2=B6=A1=A2=B8=B4=D6=C6=A1=A2=BB=F2=C9=A2=B7=A2=A3=A9=B1=BE=D3= =CA =BC=FE=D6=D0 =B5=C4=D0=C5=CF=A2=A1=A3=C8=E7=B9=FB=C4=FA=B4=ED=CA=D5=C1=CB=B1=BE=D3=CA=BC= =FE=A3=AC=C7=EB=C4=FA=C1=A2=BC=B4=B5=E7=BB=B0=BB=F2=D3=CA=BC=FE=CD=A8=D6=AA= =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB=B2=A2=C9=BE=B3=FD=B1=BE=D3=CA=BC=FE=A3=A1 This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which=20 is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. = Any use of the=20 information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial=20 disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended=20 recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by=20 phone or email immediately and delete it! -----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE----- =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Bob Proulx [mailto:bob@proulx.com]=20 =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2010=C4=EA12=D4=C227=C8=D5 11:10 =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: =C2=ED=BC=CE=D4=BE =B3=AD=CB=CD: 6794-done@debbugs.gnu.org =D6=F7=CC=E2: Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime? Because there has been no response for 144 days and I do not think this = is a bug I am closing it. Bob Bob Proulx wrote: > tags 6794 + moreinfo > thanks >=20 > =C2=ED=BC=CE=D4=BE wrote: > > I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value = > > of uptime. I found the timer invalidation. > > =20 > > I want to know if the uptime will invalid or not,when some error happen. > > If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug.=20 >=20 > Thank you for your bug report. However I was not able to understand=20 > your question. As far as we know there is no bug in uptime. >=20 > Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing. The=20 > uptime command should produce output similar to this following. >=20 > $ uptime > 09:21:05 up 12 days, 8:25, 15 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03,=20 > 0.00 >=20 > Also please show us the version of the program that you are using. >=20 > $ uptime --version >=20 > Bob From unknown Mon Aug 18 09:04:21 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator