GNU bug report logs - #6794
if there is a bug with uptime?

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: 马嘉跃 <majiayue <at> huawei.com>

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:46:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Done: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 6794 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 6794 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#6794; Package coreutils. (Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:46:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to 马嘉跃 <majiayue <at> huawei.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:46:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 马嘉跃 <majiayue <at> huawei.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: if there is a bug with uptime?
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:29:54 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi GNU
 
   I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of
uptime. I found the timer invalidation.
 
I want to know  if the uptime will  invalid or not,when some error happen.
If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug. 
 
thangk you very much!
 
 
Regards
Xieweihua


 
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#6794; Package coreutils. (Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:23:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 6794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
To: 马嘉跃 <majiayue <at> huawei.com>
Cc: 6794 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime?
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:23:20 -0600
tags 6794 + moreinfo
thanks

马嘉跃 wrote:
>    I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of
> uptime. I found the timer invalidation.
>  
> I want to know  if the uptime will  invalid or not,when some error happen.
> If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug. 

Thank you for your bug report.  However I was not able to understand
your question.  As far as we know there is no bug in uptime.

Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing.  The
uptime command should produce output similar to this following.

  $ uptime
   09:21:05 up 12 days,  8:25, 15 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00

Also please show us the version of the program that you are using.

  $ uptime --version

Bob




Added tag(s) moreinfo. Request was from Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Reply sent to Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 27 Dec 2010 03:04:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to 马嘉跃 <majiayue <at> huawei.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 27 Dec 2010 03:04:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 6794-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
To: 马嘉跃 <majiayue <at> huawei.com>
Cc: 6794-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime?
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:10:05 -0700
Because there has been no response for 144 days and I do not think
this is a bug I am closing it.

Bob

Bob Proulx wrote:
> tags 6794 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> 马嘉跃 wrote:
> >    I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value of
> > uptime. I found the timer invalidation.
> >  
> > I want to know  if the uptime will  invalid or not,when some error happen.
> > If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug. 
> 
> Thank you for your bug report.  However I was not able to understand
> your question.  As far as we know there is no bug in uptime.
> 
> Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing.  The
> uptime command should produce output similar to this following.
> 
>   $ uptime
>    09:21:05 up 12 days,  8:25, 15 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
> 
> Also please show us the version of the program that you are using.
> 
>   $ uptime --version
> 
> Bob




Message #16 received at 6794-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 马嘉跃 <majiayue <at> huawei.com>
To: 'Bob Proulx' <bob <at> proulx.com>
Cc: 6794-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: 答复: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime?
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:21:26 +0800
Ok, thank you. 

Ma Jiayue

http://www.huawei.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群
组。禁
止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发)本邮
件中
的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which 
is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any
use of the 
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to,
total or partial 
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
intended 
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender by 
phone or email immediately and delete it!


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Bob Proulx [mailto:bob <at> proulx.com] 
发送时间: 2010年12月27日 11:10
收件人: 马嘉跃
抄送: 6794-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
主题: Re: bug#6794: if there is a bug with uptime?

Because there has been no response for 144 days and I do not think this is a
bug I am closing it.

Bob

Bob Proulx wrote:
> tags 6794 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> 马嘉跃 wrote:
> >    I have a problem about uptime. I have a timer depend on the value 
> > of uptime. I found the timer invalidation.
> >  
> > I want to know  if the uptime will  invalid or not,when some error
happen.
> > If uptime have bug,please tell me how to avoid the bug. 
> 
> Thank you for your bug report.  However I was not able to understand 
> your question.  As far as we know there is no bug in uptime.
> 
> Please show us exactly the error that you are experiencing.  The 
> uptime command should produce output similar to this following.
> 
>   $ uptime
>    09:21:05 up 12 days,  8:25, 15 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 
> 0.00
> 
> Also please show us the version of the program that you are using.
> 
>   $ uptime --version
> 
> Bob





bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 14 years and 210 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.