GNU bug report logs - #67894
automake-1.16i pretest available: please test

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Peter Johansson <trojkan <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 04:46:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#67894: closed (automake-1.16i pretest available: please test)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 22:47:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:46:53 -0700
with message-id <202401022246.402MkrXf017020 <at> freefriends.org>
and subject line Re: bug#67894: automake-1.16i pretest available: please test
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67894,
regarding automake-1.16i pretest available: please test
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
67894: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67894
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Peter Johansson <trojkan <at> gmail.com>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>, bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: automake-1.16i pretest available: please test
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:44:54 +1000
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Karl,

I get one failure (t/nodef) on Ubuntu 20.04 with autoconf 2.71. It's not 
obvious to me what is going wrong. Please let me know if I can help.

I have attached the test-suite.log

Regards,

Peter

[test-suite.log.gz (application/gzip, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: trojkan <at> gmail.com
Cc: 67894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#67894: automake-1.16i pretest available: please test
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:46:53 -0700
    It seems to work. 'make check -j16' goes through and since it seemed to 
    be of a random nature previously I ran the individual test repeatedly 
    and it passed every time.

Thanks for confirming, Peter. Myriad other problems have been reported,
so it's nice to have one that actually got fixed :). Closing this out ...


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 144 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.