From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 18 17:39:36 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2023 22:39:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFMGu-0000tP-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:39:36 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:59034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFMGt-0000t7-03 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:39:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFMGl-00061h-Hb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:39:27 -0500 Received: from 195-15-241-199.dc3-a.pub1.etik-cloud.com ([195.15.241.199] helo=lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFMGk-00033Z-4T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:39:27 -0500 Received: from localhost ( [2a06:6880:42c:1600:a85:a578:71dc:aaf4]) by lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0c5e6168 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 18 Dec 2023 22:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: Daniel Ziltener Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 23:38:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libdrm: Update to 2.4.118. To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.15.241.199; envelope-from=dziltener@lyrion.ch; helo=lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud X-Spam_score_int: 24 X-Spam_score: 2.4 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 4.5 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: --- gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm index 485d55a8d3..ac2854f9e9 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ (define-public pi [...] Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [195.15.241.199 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=dziltener%40lyrion.ch; ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: dziltener@lyrion.ch X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: --- gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm index 485d55a8d3..ac2854f9e9 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ (define-public pi [...] Content analysis details: (3.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [195.15.241.199 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=dziltener%40lyrion.ch;ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17;r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --- gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm index 485d55a8d3..ac2854f9e9 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ (define-public pixman (define-public libdrm (package (name "libdrm") - (version "2.4.117") + (version "2.4.118") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ (define-public libdrm version ".tar.xz")) (sha256 (base32 - "0ar4c4ikcbm1s4sg09ld406izq5s1yk7b2n0mmvql77bwdlqv252")))) + "125bcyarlzlxfq57viyvmxy32y0561c21j46z1brrz5mya2vsxx7")))) (build-system meson-build-system) (arguments (list #:configure-flags -- 2.43.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 31 15:09:24 2023 Received: (at 67888) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2023 20:09:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rK27g-0005Ki-1a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 15:09:24 -0500 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:24039) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rK27e-0005KU-Bh for 67888@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 15:09:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1704053354; x=1704312554; bh=bcN+Ktbi808rRnqAAZIKmRRVxkAbb1HrLRC6soPtEZw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=leEQzYuu/Bd89a+xSzgULayTzlblVA0NcLqGEAZmrx0DRe8om9WBYOpAscppABMid EtOqKndQjelun5u1KvsMYp/Jpes/xs2KiBjaulXNT8B9VBz6gkhg0fkBb+q25ZKT1S qr691FXCoEG3sFQxg0NLkOePrrVx6EEppVP2BnwwMpepSGGdoFcYR2u4sZ8ubm5NjD zgSZagirYO3NZIbyU9+A5exFYMv17qWED3SQKM+CdV8mVspjHUS8M4RYs2H1pVQo3t Wars9kyHkE5gHx9kglkaoHndQXkEvwg9gQp3Q1d1kuK4maLQYXMH82G7TnRCa6i8p8 wWxPuJrXRQgeQ== Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 20:09:05 +0000 To: Daniel Ziltener From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: [bug#67888] [PATCH] gnu: libdrm: Update to 2.4.118. Message-ID: <87zfxqp21w.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67888 Cc: 67888@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:38 PM, Daniel Ziltener wrote: > --- > gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm > index 485d55a8d3..ac2854f9e9 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm > @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ (define-public pixman > (define-public libdrm > (package > (name "libdrm") > - (version "2.4.117") > + (version "2.4.118") > (source (origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append > @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ (define-public libdrm > version ".tar.xz")) > (sha256 > (base32 > - "0ar4c4ikcbm1s4sg09ld406izq5s1yk7b2n0mmvql77bwdlqv252"))= )) > + "125bcyarlzlxfq57viyvmxy32y0561c21j46z1brrz5mya2vsxx7"))= )) > (build-system meson-build-system) > (arguments > (list #:configure-flags This will have to be for core-updates I think, as I saw it after the most recent mesa-updates round. Cuirass is currently way behind on builds so I won't be able to add this in the current branch I don't think unless core-updates is months away. Also, just noticed that 2.4.119 is showing up as latest version, so we could apply a patch for that on core-updates. John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 26 10:30:58 2024 Received: (at 67888) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2024 15:30:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTOAU-0006sk-3j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:30:58 -0500 Received: from 195-15-241-199.dc3-a.pub1.etik-cloud.com ([195.15.241.199]:56264 helo=lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTOAK-0006sC-7E; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:30:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lyrion.ch; s=; t=1706283040; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+oXo0XNpkZ0iHBmhBBcjfyIhnsf3Bp7jxY8XBdZ++jo=; b=R3zXYnp6o4Z/r5bv3y/0ZRdDX0v+pUhHkH6QSAW0o/oYdRSmTzA9LPdwxR4meQGw5/e2xJ Uu7uLezuw+F5DdeXdtiv/dDuvHxkZdWO0UbSkBDzMbJ1bftA8BmedO0tAMNgrl2exFwJZM pSZUF07M7Zi1aeHjVp6xSgL+V4xcw4CMGwnM3K3ns3isVGYWvwIADAJGEVidwvTyjfV0el spAFDfCASlyEP78L4RraZXRTGqWKUW3dThmlk+6NeLeTkvm4L+mxaFpoMAMJNIz7XL7Ej6 1J/t3xN4qWjqWgfscnRTDIsIwlOES7eh+JeIjCf0Hrq/d7bnxk48pkYeGnV4qA== Received: from [IPV6:2a00:1f:99c0:1b01:7384:ea2f:bee8:8ee7] ( [2a00:1f:99c0:1b01:7384:ea2f:bee8:8ee7]) by lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 565d4080 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <8f30b612-23fd-bb58-952b-c622890cfc37@lyrion.ch> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:30:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Content-Language: en-US To: 67888@debbugs.gnu.org From: Daniel Ziltener Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libdrm: Update to 2.4.118. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 67888 thanks Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [195.15.241.199 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.1 URIBL_CSS_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus CSS blocklist [URIs: lyrion.ch] 0.1 URIBL_CSS Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus CSS blocklist [URIs: lyrion.ch] 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67888 Cc: control@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 67888 thanks Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [195.15.241.199 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.1 URIBL_CSS_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus CSS blocklist [URIs: lyrion.ch] 0.1 URIBL_CSS Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus CSS blocklist [URIs: lyrion.ch] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager close 67888 thanks From unknown Sun Jun 22 13:37:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator