GNU bug report logs - #67880
[PATCH] teams: Add ‘core-packages’ team.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 67880 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>,
 Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>, 67880 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#67880] [PATCH] teams: Add ‘core-packages’ team.
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:04:57 +0100

Hi!

Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org> skribis:

>> +(define-team core-packages
>> +  (team 'core-packages
>> +        #:name "Core packages"
>> +        #:description "Core packages: the GNU tool chain, Guile, Coreutils, etc."
>> +        #:scope (list "gnu/packages/base.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/cross-base.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/gcc.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/guile.scm"
>> +                      "gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm"
>> +                      "guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm"
>> +                      "guix/build/utils.scm"
>> +                      "guix/build-system/gnu.scm")))
>
> Seems nice.

Cool, I’m applying the patch.

> This has probably already been discussed, but should core-updates be
> renamed core-packages here to be more inline with the teams workflow?

IMO yes, that’s the logical next step.  (Maybe we can wait until the
next cycle though, dunno.)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.