From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:25:36 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#67875 <67875@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#67875 <67875@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Reply-To: bug#67875 <67875@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:25:36 +0000 retitle 67875 Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch reassign 67875 guix-patches submitter 67875 John Kehayias severity 67875 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 18 00:55:56 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2023 05:55:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59316 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rF6bc-0005xG-4K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:55:56 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:59208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rF6ba-0005x3-1E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:55:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rF6bT-0000kp-0x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:55:47 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rF6bQ-0003tm-VH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:55:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1702878942; x=1703138142; bh=FZu6i+QBBNPVh/ePsNy+/A2cEldZmZG6TvRedaj99wo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=wbFCU3+ZmTRj+MA+EE019x8+ts5HX7VlBNu6FL/OcD8z6jwd547sjLgBI+HSHrVvK d2ykVQb54ZMpLKkNyymgtznENsq2/oNIQePiCOIW+iD30GgIVeIOvm/ykWsUKia8vC 57dC1KfEchOS/4BSNj1cNSsESpmg46HYYr/Hzi+CH8yr2zBuskAWS0Lw3DaWux7Mz7 +uVnJejky2lZzKmue+PXY+5Fk/u+s4kTmZ1ktlx/aHgwsTuSt2SK+LnWkaUcdopZ/C dNDq47qzV6ubgMyYbbxijjuCzutcMBJHS/LFezC9X0DS54juNuCpBH+gxVNtIg28mv 7Z/ck2MOxmj6A== Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 05:55:35 +0000 To: "guix-patches@gnu.org" From: John Kehayias Subject: request for merging mesa-updates Message-ID: <87wmtcqckr.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.131; envelope-from=john.kehayias@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40131.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) As mentioned on guix-devel, , this is a hopefully quick branch to update mesa (new stable release as current one we have ended up without updates) and get security updates for xorg-server-xwayland, via . That requires a newer xorgproto which rebuilds (most of) the world. As with libx11 ungrafting, this is due mostly to python as far as I can tell, via the tk dependency. Unfortunately, it seems that can't be easily separated out: Anyway, there are currently those 3 commits (mesa, xorgproto, xorg-server-xwayland) building away. I'm seeing lots of builds "failing" with "missing derivation" which I've been manually restarting. The biggest real failure I've spotted just clicking around on Cuirass is gtk on i686-linux. A test fails and I have no idea why and don't see how to disable just that test so far. I tried to see about updating glib and gtk from the gnome branch to see if that fixes it, but it required too much local building so far. So, that is one to keep an eye out. At least the dependencies number around 100. Still waiting to hear from other people about current branches for what the order will be in merging, but figured I'd get things building either way with the CI looking idle. Thanks! John (this message may have gone out earlier from a different address, please ignore/I'll close that one if it appears later) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 18 06:42:09 2023 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2023 11:42:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59530 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFC0f-00014H-Dq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 06:42:09 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:43058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFC0c-000147-Oc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 06:42:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [217.155.61.229]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE45F27BBE2 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:42:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 048d9135 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:42:03 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 From: Christopher Baines To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:41:53 +0000 Message-ID: <875y0vybxw.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 67875 Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch thanks Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) retitle 67875 Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 04 00:14:13 2024 Received: (at 67875) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2024 05:14:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53493 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLG3X-0007hB-EX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:14:13 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:36649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLG3S-0007gW-Gh for 67875@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:14:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1704345236; x=1704604436; bh=aRECKxTSyrWipYx3s04SZrAe8AWjtCFmzI5idBMAlIQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=XWArZzqJxYNhwS5ZRT1wQNK/5rqtUgx89/A9ZmtAIckkmXwVtk51fCGmEVwWZCLOe Ua/mTwZhAerHR8+6QMXisWv1zqPCrhijFBat+I93gFRTrgnnzlfR6bPApqEphsbtUY g1MAzEyI+Igimtw4x016mAN1RbN+YguPIsqS+dKY4T2T52BIXCnqge7rnQ2KWTpYcq /t6LqWG6pL96wkasEdb9/OBJksESuvjC5HuHHHWkALuXALY1xfLOzFyvCAC6BWqd+y Lq6U6ei55tmChb9LaN91JhCHDdIzrUlhTh4YD8smlAL3o5Hg6WVSSnEPe2rg5H3dL7 YLXZvb77Sx2jg== Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 05:13:46 +0000 To: Efraim Flashner From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ? Message-ID: <87a5pl4r5o.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <878r5nqmod.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67875 Cc: Vivien Kraus , Maxim Cournoyer , Liliana Marie Prikler , Kaelyn , guix-devel , 67875@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Efraim and guix-devel On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 08:44 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:19:27AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:18:50PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 12:57 AM, John Kehayias wrote: >> > [snip] >> > >> > I haven't seen QA process this branch, so I'm just going with what I >> > see on Berlin. From the branches overview it shows about 61% last I >> > saw, compared to 72% for master. Unfortunately, non x86 architectures >> > are usually better covered by Bordeaux, but I don't know where to get >> > a sense of that coverage. For what it is worth, Efraim has manually >> > built xorgproto and mesa at least on powerpc64le, riscv64, without >> > issues. >> >> I had berlin build for powerpc64le and that went without any problems. >> Locally I built for riscv64 and powerpc and those both built fine. I >> ran into an issue locally with curl on aarch64 and test 1477(?) which is >> weird since it's supposed to be skipped but I'm sending it through >> again. Haven't started armhf yet. >> >> > Coverage on x86_64 and i686 seems good from what I can tell. I also >> > don't think there are any other branches ready to merge, and would >> > like to give them time to rebuild once these changes hit. >> > >> > Any thoughts on when to merge? >> > >> > Thanks everyone! >> > John > Coming back to this point, seems Berlin is doing better with building but I don't see mesa-updates on QA so I'm not sure about non x86_64/i686-linux coverage. Anyone have any thoughts? I don't know that I've seen real new failures, as still lots of "missing derivation" or other transient issues that resolve on forcing a rebuild. I don't want to merge to master and have issues with substitute coverage, but do have to call it at some point or will end up keep scheduling/waiting for rebuilds to happen anyway. Thoughts? > I've been having trouble with curl on aarch64 again. Looking at this > snippet from the build log: > > test 1477...[Verify that error codes in headers and libcurl-errors.3 are = in sync] > > 1477: stdout FAILED: > --- log/1/check-expected 2023-12-22 10:53:51.658667071 +0000 > +++ log/1/check-generated 2023-12-22 10:53:51.658667071 +0000 > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -Result[LF] > > - abort tests > test 1475...[-f and 416 with Content-Range: */size] > --pd---e--- OK (1247 out of 1472, remaining: 00:45, took 5.310s, duration= : 04:11) > test 1474...[HTTP PUT with Expect: 100-continue and 417 response during u= pload] > --pd---e--- OK (1246 out of 1472, remaining: 00:48, took 22.794s, duratio= n: 04:29) > Warning: test1474 result is ignored, but passed! > ... > TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1477 > > It looks like 1474 is passing locally and the ~1474 is telling the test > suite to ignore the result. If that's how ~ is interpreted then > I'd suggest that 1477 is failing hard enough that it's taking the test > suite with it, not merely ignoring the result. I'll continue poking it > but right now I'm starting to like the hurd plan of disabling the test > instead of merely ignoring the result. Thanks for looking at this Efraim. Looks like a good chunk of the curl rebuilds did get through, did it look okay on aarch64 and anywhere else you checked? John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 04 02:34:53 2024 Received: (at 67875) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2024 07:34:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLIFe-0003ld-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 02:34:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::333]:52690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLIFZ-0003l4-HO for 67875@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 02:34:49 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40d8991f1acso2347605e9.1 for <67875@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:34:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704353676; x=1704958476; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MqEuW181pbrBOt3c6e0ACxRB8gL1VWGyw9C6sdnBSdM=; b=FRivFT5mVE8IP6C6jI8WxIt9x+XFsFtHATq1cQ2UX87P597v+KUFzX3Ls9xbkwJtfV IYME+M4VHARv6kfOQDM7kPtFOV7zyRLvpGck231a7t8idnO+vIJCSyCuPmB4rPS1cH8j Qt+oflUklcAm4d+AvukGPN91P5nnRDpsOnCYeJtj3b0RqjzR154Rx0kPIPntNyh026fQ rKl5EbGEAfDBoN3QmRKIh8pRN7s8jDjoWMns734mYJetxX7FTo0AYtQ3FlR8SMUAr34u 3LqQIdHJE2jJeKnLE6zPubfg/kCZmE4SFjkeGqX8ARVrtbJHpG+qHTir9TlJ22Ob4QES Ta+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704353676; x=1704958476; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MqEuW181pbrBOt3c6e0ACxRB8gL1VWGyw9C6sdnBSdM=; b=swPDcrE3QYGLSfzzD/o9CCwx/oaKrP7WKHzPDXiKMuD1ogl17wRsCnymDUtGGbnBrq BHwSSE5/Fs0U8WOMcYrWrLAb3BoxDjkiHG6u4pGquojUNQYuPd9JqRLaH8ZzLmy29Jk0 LfA9LfApS6Q/lKG0COglnpBG97PGr1iLWKtuBbgPTcsLosBmPUc9BiNdKu6C8LEV6nwc Yd6RfxiaF9+tS+LocfY3cSPxwTFb1EepwNI5YMXwNQJcQkWgj4NkO7xxEAfzyAmfTXlP VZ15BwznKyQOwsHnzO5v/64a8uont5ErTU99Ncamwimzu4iw0WYqtGNbUW7e0upd+2nG Y/bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzu4kauVgWNtPw+4kq/hlrVcTA8xXA+OkiS7CkrrmpzF8XoGK48 1cvejyPwJaOkTyf/tY8aj5g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFUzRFdUuSsV2NlD87Qc0CNr5xEtXV+BDwoYGuipUoGUd6Ai+H0O+ixPvNpYyMeteOSwXyyCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:490a:b0:40d:5f48:d588 with SMTP id f10-20020a05600c490a00b0040d5f48d588mr114794wmp.133.1704353675927; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:34:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([141.226.15.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id iv18-20020a05600c549200b0040d6eb862a7sm4782914wmb.41.2024.01.03.23.34.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:34:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:34:33 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: John Kehayias Subject: Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: John Kehayias , guix-devel , Kaelyn , Maxim Cournoyer , Liliana Marie Prikler , Vivien Kraus , 67875@debbugs.gnu.org References: <878r5nqmod.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5pl4r5o.fsf@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ra1Uh+uq9vwPz/F4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a5pl4r5o.fsf@protonmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67875 Cc: Vivien Kraus , Maxim Cournoyer , Liliana Marie Prikler , Kaelyn , guix-devel , 67875@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --ra1Uh+uq9vwPz/F4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 05:13:46AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi Efraim and guix-devel >=20 > On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 08:44 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:19:27AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:18:50PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 12:57 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > >> > > [snip] > >> > > >> > I haven't seen QA process this branch, so I'm just going with what I > >> > see on Berlin. From the branches overview it shows about 61% last I > >> > saw, compared to 72% for master. Unfortunately, non x86 architectures > >> > are usually better covered by Bordeaux, but I don't know where to get > >> > a sense of that coverage. For what it is worth, Efraim has manually > >> > built xorgproto and mesa at least on powerpc64le, riscv64, without > >> > issues. > >> > >> I had berlin build for powerpc64le and that went without any problems. > >> Locally I built for riscv64 and powerpc and those both built fine. I > >> ran into an issue locally with curl on aarch64 and test 1477(?) which = is > >> weird since it's supposed to be skipped but I'm sending it through > >> again. Haven't started armhf yet. > >> > >> > Coverage on x86_64 and i686 seems good from what I can tell. I also > >> > don't think there are any other branches ready to merge, and would > >> > like to give them time to rebuild once these changes hit. > >> > > >> > Any thoughts on when to merge? > >> > > >> > Thanks everyone! > >> > John > > >=20 > Coming back to this point, seems Berlin is doing better with building > but I don't see mesa-updates on QA so I'm not sure about non > x86_64/i686-linux coverage. Anyone have any thoughts? >=20 > I don't know that I've seen real new failures, as still lots of > "missing derivation" or other transient issues that resolve on forcing > a rebuild. >=20 > I don't want to merge to master and have issues with substitute > coverage, but do have to call it at some point or will end up keep > scheduling/waiting for rebuilds to happen anyway. >=20 > Thoughts? I've been massaging the aarch64 builds to try to build out to rust, currently I'm still around cmake. Last time we relied on bayfront for substitutes, which I'd be okay with again, as long as we can tell that it's doing alright. > > I've been having trouble with curl on aarch64 again. Looking at this > > snippet from the build log: > > > > test 1477...[Verify that error codes in headers and libcurl-errors.3 ar= e in sync] > > > > 1477: stdout FAILED: > > --- log/1/check-expected 2023-12-22 10:53:51.658667071 +0000 > > +++ log/1/check-generated 2023-12-22 10:53:51.658667071 +0000 > > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > > -Result[LF] > > > > - abort tests > > test 1475...[-f and 416 with Content-Range: */size] > > --pd---e--- OK (1247 out of 1472, remaining: 00:45, took 5.310s, durati= on: 04:11) > > test 1474...[HTTP PUT with Expect: 100-continue and 417 response during= upload] > > --pd---e--- OK (1246 out of 1472, remaining: 00:48, took 22.794s, durat= ion: 04:29) > > Warning: test1474 result is ignored, but passed! > > ... > > TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1477 > > > > It looks like 1474 is passing locally and the ~1474 is telling the test > > suite to ignore the result. If that's how ~ is interpreted then > > I'd suggest that 1477 is failing hard enough that it's taking the test > > suite with it, not merely ignoring the result. I'll continue poking it > > but right now I'm starting to like the hurd plan of disabling the test > > instead of merely ignoring the result. >=20 > Thanks for looking at this Efraim. Looks like a good chunk of the curl > rebuilds did get through, did it look okay on aarch64 and anywhere > else you checked? Looks like I got it working on whichever systems I tested it on and I today saw it build correctly on Berlin. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --ra1Uh+uq9vwPz/F4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmWWX4YACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1Hp/g//UBJ313bP+/4vChJZnU4bX2Q3YgTq+a749fJUCgKPqNC5fp2uXsjxUZnF dh0nbvfg4DJ5dmiPOqNjvzPZ7YurO3kigWn8VPvVAS9tiGNZQRSiRkofADZvW1wS zbTb4aeAOzQW2uq47y18K8ZuAbx4hYdYTR5M2qQqsQ8aNAPzjBF06H5WOUVigtMY cxkw0AenmtSxduwrssDdipaAnyMBp1TUck5rtzsonWNuzDvM1E0lkXhR8UcwZ0RI vBAIKlIugIkd48fUKlx0301YoL4/1hf6Ley9aSmMehsk2O/Cu+5sP1EdfPKLdo5I GcKYN8Pq5S3DfaLNHej19pw5sqG+vkSYLmi8XauXXQCCfk3WhoNmb32vcHuaKlmE ARfdycXELS7Gi2hrxtDHu8kk9Z4OEQMiaLYOx/d9lTZU9LMDJc4xsj+eEidHPnjK 1M4I3t4otcGjgGVv6vz12VVKM8G8HQMYSvYFitRfxjUrBm/5GzYjNQseTzXcc3W+ Q+W/xNWZMoK0OlWRTvwxs/3+tVdAwnGLT4TDDuaGrYPOFOkmfIN+OWKwoR9KWp8i mmm6GqwnhbqxeSpXBFpnBEF1i5SOqEIFdMvaxj5pbE/9a/wgnQXJUkJWCXrRg6js f9Bk4T3VnG+LRQ7zYzpNI5649H4ELUASk8N0xL1wt9lqaE7olb4= =KOP9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ra1Uh+uq9vwPz/F4-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 08 00:44:19 2024 Received: (at 67875) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2024 05:44:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMiQs-00036m-R9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:44:19 -0500 Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.133]:11379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMiQq-00036Y-V9 for 67875@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:44:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1704692644; x=1704951844; bh=FmbHdjQTlWnsPZlbuIViSeMT6WDyMxzUSLrpaXZpi5U=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=LOzvZPyVLp+LYqJCyUVMYebn3UiSX0x8tHTVbK5Xc9ZkVJ5o1V+XDIpA8IwIjU8k2 z8kEzbLzeBDKfVwBBaUBshIOdWZ3pqTJNDPPGTyWvX58b3o0Npvb/23nD/QtiNcMUg YrLkTkkWyGYNQeRSCHWYsVf/4oXhfOL9yjVDGnxkystdTPL4QezRsURTn3dHBtdzti jgTN7ekxTV7Xxcst56Jt8R7PPfk4PZHT7SQ+Ttjzf3gQuU4mmPdPmS7UNSqVyjz7l+ QmHaT5WjHhb04usMEzpoS9qgLCC0yZqBPZBbh/jEdZYMFLUgme7hQBcR4XMfgp+l+4 pff72t6nCYcdg== Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 05:43:40 +0000 To: guix-devel From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ? Message-ID: <87mstg1it6.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67875 Cc: Vivien Kraus , Maxim Cournoyer , Efraim Flashner , Liliana Marie Prikler , Kaelyn , 67875@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi all, Forgive the top post and please see below/previous messages for previous updates. TL;DR: I plan to merge mesa-updates into master today-ish (well, tomorrow for me at this point). I've been checking in with Efraim who's been very helpful at trying to nudge along substitute coverage on non-x86_64 platforms. Unfortunately looks like we have plateaued a bit on, e.g., aarch64. We haven't been getting stats from QA for this round, and Berlin looks good for what it covers (x86) but other architectures are down from what we can tell. I don't think there are any fundamental failures at this point but just lots of "missing derivation" errors (I've restarted so many manually for x86_64/i686) and builds not completing without restarts. Or unknown reasons. Given the few weeks I've given this and the risk of just perpetually doing rebuilds to keep catching up (with then more updates to push) I think it would be best to merge to master. Mesa and other bits will continue to move forward as well, so I think it is time so we can be somewhat timely. I'd rather not without complete substitute coverage, but given recent build farm difficulties, and the tools we do have for users (pinning, weather checks, etc.) I think it is best to call this branch so we can move on. Gnome has some updates that will need (re)building as well as trying to move forward with core-updates now too. This is a case where having some better sense of our users and actual substitute needs/wants would be helpful (yes, Guix survey!) as well as recognizing our current infrastructure limits. Here's another vote for prioritizing infrastructure and making sure QA lives and expands. Feel free to object to this merge timing, though with the relative silence in each previous message I take it I can make a call here. Thanks everyone and hope 2024 is off to a good start! Enjoy the new mesa with curl and xwayland security updates (no new grafts!). John On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:09 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi Efraim and guix-devel > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 08:44 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:19:27AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:18:50PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 12:57 AM, John Kehayias wrote: >>> > > [snip] >>> > >>> > I haven't seen QA process this branch, so I'm just going with what I >>> > see on Berlin. From the branches overview it shows about 61% last I >>> > saw, compared to 72% for master. Unfortunately, non x86 architectures >>> > are usually better covered by Bordeaux, but I don't know where to get >>> > a sense of that coverage. For what it is worth, Efraim has manually >>> > built xorgproto and mesa at least on powerpc64le, riscv64, without >>> > issues. >>> >>> I had berlin build for powerpc64le and that went without any problems. >>> Locally I built for riscv64 and powerpc and those both built fine. I >>> ran into an issue locally with curl on aarch64 and test 1477(?) which i= s >>> weird since it's supposed to be skipped but I'm sending it through >>> again. Haven't started armhf yet. >>> >>> > Coverage on x86_64 and i686 seems good from what I can tell. I also >>> > don't think there are any other branches ready to merge, and would >>> > like to give them time to rebuild once these changes hit. >>> > >>> > Any thoughts on when to merge? >>> > >>> > Thanks everyone! >>> > John >> > > Coming back to this point, seems Berlin is doing better with building > but I don't see mesa-updates on QA so I'm not sure about non > x86_64/i686-linux coverage. Anyone have any thoughts? > > I don't know that I've seen real new failures, as still lots of > "missing derivation" or other transient issues that resolve on forcing > a rebuild. > > I don't want to merge to master and have issues with substitute > coverage, but do have to call it at some point or will end up keep > scheduling/waiting for rebuilds to happen anyway. > > Thoughts? > >> I've been having trouble with curl on aarch64 again. Looking at this >> snippet from the build log: >> >> test 1477...[Verify that error codes in headers and libcurl-errors.3 are= in sync] >> >> 1477: stdout FAILED: >> --- log/1/check-expected 2023-12-22 10:53:51.658667071 +0000 >> +++ log/1/check-generated 2023-12-22 10:53:51.658667071 +0000 >> @@ -1 +0,0 @@ >> -Result[LF] >> >> - abort tests >> test 1475...[-f and 416 with Content-Range: */size] >> --pd---e--- OK (1247 out of 1472, remaining: 00:45, took 5.310s, duratio= n: 04:11) >> test 1474...[HTTP PUT with Expect: 100-continue and 417 response during = upload] >> --pd---e--- OK (1246 out of 1472, remaining: 00:48, took 22.794s, durati= on: 04:29) >> Warning: test1474 result is ignored, but passed! >> ... >> TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1477 >> >> It looks like 1474 is passing locally and the ~1474 is telling the test >> suite to ignore the result. If that's how ~ is interpreted then >> I'd suggest that 1477 is failing hard enough that it's taking the test >> suite with it, not merely ignoring the result. I'll continue poking it >> but right now I'm starting to like the hurd plan of disabling the test >> instead of merely ignoring the result. > > Thanks for looking at this Efraim. Looks like a good chunk of the curl > rebuilds did get through, did it look okay on aarch64 and anywhere > else you checked? > > John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 08 03:33:06 2024 Received: (at 67875) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2024 08:33:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMl4E-0005ZO-EH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 03:33:06 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:49624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMl4C-0005Yu-Bh for 67875@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 03:33:04 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3368b1e056eso1525068f8f.3 for <67875@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:32:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704702772; x=1705307572; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YEAS7viy0V5ErLYG2/vje6lzuNh6dGkrLf12gfmS3JE=; b=Lg2HAg1uzmciOqPahwKK+5JaxX46U70crvBf11wDB3km33iAbyFY0eRnl0KzwIxl1G rXuyG7kvp9/CY1Y3qtRglvH9Rz+YAZrdoXgHergdWogEYinvxo3N4LPh3jlE3YyzW1Ut CtEoO6bzf6WpqEo7MwOPwo6nHnWKl7nXY4F5rxzcUTNK9opI9EIyaj28Jxau58/9K1Ag 4VzY/Enzlv9dI/j/NUoJG250McpywhHLT38HQfoQ231pfsrVMnHdJkOhpj675n0ZP4Uf x6FLM8B/+W9H9F7x6K/20Gs7tY/xezfB3Uwf7gdSv7QRJbGfMTUGsxz5Zc59hZDuAbQ9 Y1Nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704702772; x=1705307572; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YEAS7viy0V5ErLYG2/vje6lzuNh6dGkrLf12gfmS3JE=; b=QJdh8e/dSLflDPhGbLJx402R6D6bTJyX5P/40G+3LnMyts20DGPW/Ued/K2EznQECv jsP3KaCG9ikZt/luFdS3UjDxYDqxXjPHD+IWpsMc6r8TJFU+XkILIQiPjsj2BRU4LTv6 Mhr3Fp5tEgjdO59uOc+9ae/w71mYdzEKGNdKQB5HoTcHsIQQNbkConJDoKkYPpZzcQFv 7c4aNuz2HhonPnJqKz8JWsV+KBiPT0Dzs4gWDk5mbLX3aB4m9wIyvo85XVMoUOYJl/ho 6Mi/5bVR+VewDRKNXLmwlFOOC1+gkpVDKSDONX6utr4TiQjuwcjQEpxkFh3+hbT+Jmsi ElIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx8lHu27zEM0Jg278T0dN0Jt8+8qVy2Ai31euzjpi+zryNPxYyA dAXEPHCc2Sc2Zz9YAobW9PY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDJluy5BmQnFmT2gFZ4+mS2agMFTGeGlykScOezM9mFypxY+eJ0QYAs1AOo6Ejkd54VyNhQw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3ecf:b0:40e:44c5:e299 with SMTP id ek15-20020a05600c3ecf00b0040e44c5e299mr991317wmb.17.1704702771894; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([141.226.15.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i13-20020a5d630d000000b003366c058509sm7152000wru.23.2024.01.08.00.32.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:32:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:32:50 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: John Kehayias Subject: Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: John Kehayias , guix-devel , Kaelyn , Maxim Cournoyer , Liliana Marie Prikler , Vivien Kraus , 67875@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87mstg1it6.fsf@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZFun0THg8qDq4Mya" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mstg1it6.fsf@protonmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67875 Cc: Vivien Kraus , Maxim Cournoyer , Liliana Marie Prikler , Kaelyn , guix-devel , 67875@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --ZFun0THg8qDq4Mya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:43:40AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Forgive the top post and please see below/previous messages for > previous updates. >=20 > TL;DR: I plan to merge mesa-updates into master today-ish (well, > tomorrow for me at this point). >=20 > I've been checking in with Efraim who's been very helpful at trying to > nudge along substitute coverage on non-x86_64 platforms. Unfortunately > looks like we have plateaued a bit on, e.g., aarch64. We haven't been > getting stats from QA for this round, and Berlin looks good for what > it covers (x86) but other architectures are down from what we can > tell. >=20 > I don't think there are any fundamental failures at this point but > just lots of "missing derivation" errors (I've restarted so many > manually for x86_64/i686) and builds not completing without restarts. > Or unknown reasons. Given the few weeks I've given this and the risk > of just perpetually doing rebuilds to keep catching up (with then more > updates to push) I think it would be best to merge to master. Mesa and > other bits will continue to move forward as well, so I think it is > time so we can be somewhat timely. >=20 > I'd rather not without complete substitute coverage, but given recent > build farm difficulties, and the tools we do have for users (pinning, > weather checks, etc.) I think it is best to call this branch so we can > move on. Gnome has some updates that will need (re)building as well as > trying to move forward with core-updates now too. >=20 > This is a case where having some better sense of our users and actual > substitute needs/wants would be helpful (yes, Guix survey!) as well as > recognizing our current infrastructure limits. Here's another vote for > prioritizing infrastructure and making sure QA lives and expands. >=20 > Feel free to object to this merge timing, though with the relative > silence in each previous message I take it I can make a call here. >=20 > Thanks everyone and hope 2024 is off to a good start! Enjoy the new > mesa with curl and xwayland security updates (no new grafts!). To record here more or less what I said on IRC, we're currently at rust-1.56 or 1.57 on the mesa-teams branch, and we're looking at probably more than a week to build out to rust itself, and then the packages which depend on it. Currently, on master, Berlin already is running behind on building rust, and it wasn't until after the previous mesa-updates merge that it caught up with building rust. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --ZFun0THg8qDq4Mya Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmWbsy8ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HARBAAiSX9kQxkMpVXRXiVLOneEPVoIhua+XENY+T34G0yXxhIFSERYOZBEwPh lcwR+iNB7VERB+zhs7ogqnAz1itZNfPCm9ks1Tw5urjMhZepCgTKl4iqOGq3kPbn y5SjEYhil94w95QNjxVhEB06elFSoiPKbXmX59fB470mJoPXVy1Qbc3QIGAsV856 VhPROiO7yR7JtByQu/NV+Z+e+8sNjoMflLTjV7baes355v41fNwbLGsq4kuMjXQ3 Cb6HIcdS9Q3dKsd/8jaY5QEY4bHq4dl3+g0moWTjqdbYPqjZJnJkmo/vWp41Dn3B 32FS55i3w9EJSDEWX8o1/TQkGsdqFegjlS6qpL5og2zVfAkpSrZgFxGQ08OLNtUp 8StkjHSuEPQ602CKx/JVfDWP3fKtbRNit1CKHO08t7mf1NsUJb91dRs6ucccYRQI CbXYC672OJiloxpXDJnWE4gHsALFl3i9OUA9KXZwWsl9u49PkOstChZKV2cl95Bu 7HB9evFbGR2dmCdJk9k41J1QPvBws7vGOBTsGjdkvxeVb9PSRjAA0q5JgWzYjgUf O+76FYUWUWeEzGUdtd2ZlhSQ98D4XTZAQfQDu4E0b5+x0i4sEjjGZGOXcVvKjxCk qFyr3YfeKQPuMAzSNgWBezfYAFR7TecL9WA4xNH1vHGR1Rxdtl0= =2mPz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZFun0THg8qDq4Mya-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 08 12:25:08 2024 Received: (at 67875-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2024 17:25:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37467 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMtN5-0001kP-RX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 12:25:08 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:15003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMtN4-0001jv-CN for 67875-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 12:25:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1704734694; x=1704993894; bh=5e/+KaeXX9wGDonmXhkt5F5O0Bo/RK6K3eui/FoZlcQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=QDkUF/Mps+Mafe/su7tQPM6v3BA9/Lftx69MisWcBTLaDVAFxtTCFa6HEWake0rnj iEWA7RAgqKfL1ieYoDWjga+5+22/HsBV+CtGxq36B2Om9nogeQByQS9JXSy2NtzSEP 4TKAtw1rMPb/TSi2t+2kbiP5q6Uf8fd768ap3tsacaaAms2v7cve+I0BM7NjW0VG7K K5mRdfnKBF9fh49wKMRX8QLVYo8HOdXAvY1lb2q7E35rVfcfJjP2BqgTSFmQ1yPv5j ThqaJ3KMe2KZ2UevNYjcTqwJ+PO+rmqXHvQfVB/7FL1pFHT3QO/76+U71T9pPGMO17 EWvGFho2gzNSA== Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 17:24:42 +0000 To: Efraim Flashner From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ? Message-ID: <87le8z20xf.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <87mstg1it6.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67875-done Cc: Vivien Kraus , Maxim Cournoyer , Liliana Marie Prikler , 67875-done@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel , Kaelyn X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:32 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:43:40AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Forgive the top post and please see below/previous messages for >> previous updates. >> >> TL;DR: I plan to merge mesa-updates into master today-ish (well, >> tomorrow for me at this point). >> >> I've been checking in with Efraim who's been very helpful at trying to >> nudge along substitute coverage on non-x86_64 platforms. Unfortunately >> looks like we have plateaued a bit on, e.g., aarch64. We haven't been >> getting stats from QA for this round, and Berlin looks good for what >> it covers (x86) but other architectures are down from what we can >> tell. >> >> I don't think there are any fundamental failures at this point but >> just lots of "missing derivation" errors (I've restarted so many >> manually for x86_64/i686) and builds not completing without restarts. >> Or unknown reasons. Given the few weeks I've given this and the risk >> of just perpetually doing rebuilds to keep catching up (with then more >> updates to push) I think it would be best to merge to master. Mesa and >> other bits will continue to move forward as well, so I think it is >> time so we can be somewhat timely. >> >> I'd rather not without complete substitute coverage, but given recent >> build farm difficulties, and the tools we do have for users (pinning, >> weather checks, etc.) I think it is best to call this branch so we can >> move on. Gnome has some updates that will need (re)building as well as >> trying to move forward with core-updates now too. >> >> This is a case where having some better sense of our users and actual >> substitute needs/wants would be helpful (yes, Guix survey!) as well as >> recognizing our current infrastructure limits. Here's another vote for >> prioritizing infrastructure and making sure QA lives and expands. >> >> Feel free to object to this merge timing, though with the relative >> silence in each previous message I take it I can make a call here. >> >> Thanks everyone and hope 2024 is off to a good start! Enjoy the new >> mesa with curl and xwayland security updates (no new grafts!). > > To record here more or less what I said on IRC, we're currently at > rust-1.56 or 1.57 on the mesa-teams branch, and we're looking at > probably more than a week to build out to rust itself, and then the > packages which depend on it. Currently, on master, Berlin already is > running behind on building rust, and it wasn't until after the previous > mesa-updates merge that it caught up with building rust. Thanks again for your help and watchful eye on this Efraim! Merged in 7a7c8920aeddaf9ab8d68c572780bc34b404711b. Thanks everyone, apologies for anyone that needs to wait for substitutes. Feel free to CC me directly on any breakages due to this merge but hopefully I didn't miss anything major. John From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:25:36 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 12:24:14 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator