From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 15 16:24:35 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2023 21:24:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rEFfe-0006d5-Nh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:35 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:37722) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rEFfc-0006cr-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rEFfX-000606-H2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:27 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rEFfV-0007b5-Hq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40c2db2ee28so13473105e9.2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:24:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702675464; x=1703280264; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:to:content-language :references:reply-to:subject:from:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=HxgAe/Aes/3oGuSjPSZ5R7U45c65O3ij2WtBZzCx0qs=; b=LM5PKSviWa0xnW4cO2niS1ZBwC2f2tvj1Zay1Crb/pCn2dsG5CYX5P74oya/TRVMPa OPv8aFIhlqH/6Llq+BXJPPjSYos/ko/UUNBaxrOzE9AxOrZ8sZwyjT4b7DZgRvtmeG2q b6ceypksQEswSqZ5kB9XDniU1ZoBBV1brk1XLIZXV2mOYU37s6OeAmGTbIvJ6ncvYSh/ R/GMPrHPol4G7O8454gjjXQ8VdaRruJDAyxNhdKyBXdKd68mkko5DPq7jBL0VVnTdmes w6L5lNAbmS58cGKPVJzVald7fbYWAtkf7FIQA6001uyQkC1W3u16Uz0OlKmmR6p5PM0e MrQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7UQuT0ABuSaR+C/Y4URec2ZeXhp3VUTZ/YpJniLiFOzV6QPXW Y2eHNh5fs+fqvBdVfBbwvxSOOg0AWoU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGtAqSt/zQ9xpF9xPxFIjBS5zyF0VfK73kj9+b63hPAFhrkJETv+qhv3A+qE2ZCxmRtsANvdg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2b0e:b0:40c:337e:f059 with SMTP id y14-20020a05600c2b0e00b0040c337ef059mr6472283wme.65.1702675463822; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.34] ([37.166.103.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fm14-20020a05600c0c0e00b00407b93d8085sm32955771wmb.27.2023.12.15.13.24.22 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:24:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <327a4235-10c8-13ac-0209-9657bf3c6ead@member.fsf.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 22:24:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 From: Alexandre Hannud Abdo Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add libgda-5. References: <86b06d832aa97ba607220c01dad63540890d7c95.1702674710.git.abdo@member.fsf.org> Content-Language: en-US To: guix-patches In-Reply-To: <86b06d832aa97ba607220c01dad63540890d7c95.1702674710.git.abdo@member.fsf.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.128.54; envelope-from=alehabdo@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-f54.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (libgda-5): New variable. Bring back libgda at version 5, required by sequeler. Adapt and apply patch for cve-2021-39359. Change-Id: I152273ebe788029e596193912ed63a24f489eab6 --- gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 90 +++++++++++++++++++ .../patches/libgda-5-cve-2021-39359.patch | 33 +++++++ 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+) creat [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alehabdo[at]gmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ale Abdo Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (libgda-5): New variable. Bring back libgda at version 5, required by sequeler. Adapt and apply patch for cve-2021-39359. Change-Id: I152273ebe788029e596193912ed63a24f489eab6 --- gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 90 +++++++++++++++++++ .../patches/libgda-5-cve-2021-39359.patch | 33 +++++++ 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/libgda-5-cve-2021-39359.patch diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm index 69698cf4fc..5800e09ea8 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm @@ -13241,6 +13241,96 @@ (define-public libgda your data.") (license license:lgpl2.1+))) + +;; This is required for 'sequeler which has not been ported to libgda-6 yet. +(define-public libgda-5 + (package + (name "libgda") + (version "5.2.10") + (source + (origin + (method git-fetch) + (uri (git-reference + (url "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgda.git/") + (commit (string-append "LIBGDA_" (string-replace-substring + version "." "_"))))) + (file-name (git-file-name name version)) + (sha256 + (base32 "18rg773gq9v3cdywpmrp12c5xyp97ir9yqjinccpi22sksb1kl8a")) + (modules '((guix build utils))) + (snippet + ;; Remove the bundled sqlite, but keep its header because code relies + ;; on this header variant. + '(delete-file "libgda/sqlite/sqlite-src/sqlite3.c")) + (patches (search-patches "libgda-5-cve-2021-39359.patch")))) + (build-system gnu-build-system) + (arguments + `(#:configure-flags '("--enable-system-sqlite" "--enable-vala") + ;; There's a race between check_cnc_lock and check_threaded_cnc + ;; in tests/multi-threading. + #:parallel-tests? #f + #:phases + (modify-phases %standard-phases + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-glade-install + (lambda _ + (substitute* "configure.ac" + (("`\\$PKG_CONFIG --variable=catalogdir gladeui-2\\.0`") + "${datadir}/glade/catalogs") + (("`\\$PKG_CONFIG --variable=pixmapdir gladeui-2\\.0`") + "${datadir}/glade/pixmaps")) + #t)) + (add-before 'check 'pre-check + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys) + ;; Tests require a running X server. + (system "Xvfb :1 &") + (setenv "DISPLAY" ":1") + #t)) + (add-after 'install 'symlink-glade-module + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys) + (let* ((shlib "libgda-ui-5.0.so") + (out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) + (out/lib (string-append out "/lib")) + (moduledir (string-append out/lib "/glade/modules"))) + (mkdir-p moduledir) + (symlink (string-append out/lib "/" shlib) + (string-append moduledir "/" shlib)) + #t)))))) + (propagated-inputs + (list libxml2)) ; required by libgda-5.0.pc + (inputs + (list glib + glade3 + gtk+ + libsecret + libxslt + openssl + sqlite + vala)) + (native-inputs + `(("autoconf" ,autoconf) + ("autoconf-archive" ,autoconf-archive) + ("automake" ,automake) + ("glib:bin" ,glib "bin") + ("gnome-common" ,gnome-common) + ("gobject-introspection" ,gobject-introspection) + ("gtk-doc" ,gtk-doc/stable) + ("intltool" ,intltool) + ("libtool" ,libtool) + ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config) + ("vala" ,vala) + ("which" ,which) + ("xorg-server" ,xorg-server-for-tests) + ("yelp-tools" ,yelp-tools))) + (home-page "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgda") + (synopsis "Uniform data access") + (description + "GNU Data Access (GDA) is an attempt to provide uniform access to +different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, +etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access +your data.") + (license license:lgpl2.1+))) + + (define-public gtranslator (package (name "gtranslator") diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/libgda-5-cve-2021-39359.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/libgda-5-cve-2021-39359.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..960eab7e4e --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/libgda-5-cve-2021-39359.patch @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +From bebdffb4de586fb43fd07ac549121f4b22f6812d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: "Douglas R. Reno" +Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:18:01 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH] Fix CVE-2021-39359 by forcing TLS certificate validation + +This was done by adding "ssl-use-system-ca-file", TRUE to the options +for each soup_session_new_with_options() call that was made. + +Tested on Linux From Scratch 11.0 and Debian 11. + +Fixes #249 +--- + providers/web/gda-web-provider.c | 4 ++-- + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/providers/web/gda-web-provider.c b/providers/web/gda-web-provider.c +index cf8d14dc3..cc818895f 100644 +--- a/providers/web/gda-web-provider.c ++++ b/providers/web/gda-web-provider.c +@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ gda_web_provider_open_connection (GdaServerProvider *provider, GdaConnection *cn + g_rec_mutex_init (& (cdata->mutex)); + cdata->server_id = NULL; + cdata->forced_closing = FALSE; +- cdata->worker_session = soup_session_sync_new (); +- cdata->front_session = soup_session_sync_new_with_options ("max-conns-per-host", 1, NULL); ++ cdata->worker_session = soup_session_new_with_options ("ssl-use-system-ca-file", TRUE, NULL); ++ cdata->front_session = soup_session_new_with_options ("max-conns-per-host", 1, "ssl-use-system-ca-file", TRUE, NULL); + if (use_ssl) { + server_url = g_string_new ("https://"); + g_print ("USING SSL\n"); +-- +GitLab + base-commit: 92f179ab20f1835933b2526bfc5d9489e3b1e226 -- 2.41.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 12 12:00:14 2024 Received: (at 67844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2024 17:00:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOKtC-0004zm-4v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:00:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:59762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOKt8-0004WH-ME; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:00:12 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3366e78d872so6872826f8f.3; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:00:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705078806; x=1705683606; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:content-language:to :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=OZlc4bGwxvOIbEDrXAhdnnTgAWjWzLf2s2Yn3U01v+e4DTpWQa94y1jT9j6kDDlzbs qZeTpjyzWFOZfIoFQIe4t5wfJc5pGdC+wofwgY+4ohn0R6ydX0b7OOWza2Ag5fez0ncP F3T4cnQHdjTB9mzUyRL5QPLoBdigEX9kbrMBhIDfVe/nBNVl3iS4TQdSMAEpLqvlG1ks I+G7XC09lXM2lLrNV052vWAUL4aQMWMLH8vaPJCaDECix0W2QYpYmLt+B/uPqHkBPTtk YHIjBdnG703ctXvY7+KQRFUTamtPn4sRiD2CX+yOtFKgtIM3IluzaZ9x+Ktg+2XnbeK0 xMYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWa2+c7ZTYki6G8t2ca1qCmWX4s6IfzXlb0oAfi2DpJWcvPZzq qTuIxN81To6tGXygTEr43q4IywYrp2w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGweg1HpexNmKz3dmKcdnkWIOOVbUc4u0eYs2T/m/Nu2FT2nbU/fFDc4jdxzj2k22uZ/keg8w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5230:0:b0:333:2fd2:765e with SMTP id i16-20020a5d5230000000b003332fd2765emr451731wra.79.1705078806153; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:00:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.34] ([37.165.184.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15-20020adfef4f000000b00336d24b4847sm4304003wrp.114.2024.01.12.09.00.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:00:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:00:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 To: 67634@debbugs.gnu.org, 67636@debbugs.gnu.org, 67843@debbugs.gnu.org, 67844@debbugs.gnu.org, 67845@debbugs.gnu.org, 68408@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Language: en-US From: Alexandre Hannud Abdo Subject: close all my patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 2.5 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alehabdo[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67844 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 2.5 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alehabdo[at]gmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 12 12:14:28 2024 Received: (at 67844-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2024 17:14:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOL6y-0007VH-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:14:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:50495) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOL6u-0007US-5z; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:14:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e69b31366so2014105e9.1; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:14:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705079660; x=1705684460; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=GQ3694qvcmDGf8B5D9sVUuPsjCwy4mlLrPuJxcHY0ADSmE3MBTmtO6BuzxAL0WXz92 EIuZTWqroUjpWB/IkzeUvkYdUL90hZXMNoMpCzS/ZErU2FqZ9m6Il/4jKkmDc9vHgct+ e7jBso+tlmSSoRMKH1qDa9CgCP5gUyGR/kz9y78gnr2TZdVdu1+ZS6/dezC9ZzqNsbY8 z5+3YSGVayEkhcOU5CfxC8vbnyCVxWZWyMELP83yDTUISZSEd60lH14rvigqdxRyZHAK VqQhoxWAqtkb3mmGGpiWHwvmrZSl8cVl7SQ45pNJV+2gIy3zLu69uW3RIInU2vaxXzlG xjqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzKs0QbFVcjdT+TTWKKrGU5792SUvkh8ZR1PWb+2IW7wrgyuxt2 tN3eZfysKMhhWxYXgORO8y3l8Chbh3k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHNQz/qH6RoShSeUk2Y9I2CsudmYhOVFfOluLQMked3HZvErqc+agvGUzoDsq5SJMCwzV6uKA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3d4:0:b0:40c:55c4:45f5 with SMTP id t20-20020a7bc3d4000000b0040c55c445f5mr955642wmj.132.1705079660015; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.34] ([37.165.184.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n30-20020a05600c501e00b0040e6a4f5739sm57719wmr.14.2024.01.12.09.14.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:14:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e92c8e5-d626-8440-2963-c198e75e613e@member.fsf.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:14:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Content-Language: en-US To: 67634-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 67636-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 67843-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 67844-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 67845-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 68408-done@debbugs.gnu.org From: Alexandre Hannud Abdo Subject: actually close all my patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 2.5 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alehabdo[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.54 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67844-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.54 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 2.5 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alehabdo[at]gmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager From unknown Thu Aug 14 18:37:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator