GNU bug report logs -
#67797
non-free license listed in module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 23:53:18 -0400
with message-id <87v82tb9ox.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#67797: non-free license listed in module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67797,
regarding non-free license listed in module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
67797: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67797
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
In our syntax-case implementation, module/ice-9/psyntax.scm, the
following license text can be found:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
;;; Portable implementation of syntax-case
;;; Originally extracted from Chez Scheme Version 5.9f
;;; Authors: R. Kent Dybvig, Oscar Waddell, Bob Hieb, Carl Bruggeman
;;; Copyright (c) 1992-1997 Cadence Research Systems
;;; Permission to copy this software, in whole or in part, to use this
;;; software for any lawful purpose, and to redistribute this software
;;; is granted subject to the restriction that all copies made of this
;;; software must include this copyright notice in full. This software
;;; is provided AS IS, with NO WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
;;; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
;;; OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
;;; AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY
;;; NATURE WHATSOEVER.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Due to restricting the use to "lawful purpose", it conflicts with the
(L)GPL, as it places restrictions on running the program.
Perhaps there are alternative, clean implementations out there under a
suitable license we could use?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Mike Gran <spk121 <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>
>>> Do I understand correctly that any copyright license comes with an
>>> implicit "lawful" condition so as to be considered valid, per the law of
>>> USA at least? And that making this explicit is thus not considered a
>>> restriction on the use?
>>
>> That is how I understand it. I am not a lawyer, but, I have had to read a fair number
>> of government contracts.
>
> Thank you. To get confirmation from a more authoritative source, I've
> asked the question to same to FSF Licensing & Compliance Team; I'll
> report their response if any!
Haven't heard back, but this doesn't seem to be an issue, after all.
Closing.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 47 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.